« Previous | Main | Next »

Abramoff Probe Still Active, Fees Indicate

November 13, 2007 3:00 PM

Abramoffprobe_mn A possible sign that the Jack Abramoff investigation continues to burrow into Capitol Hill, a congressman under scrutiny for his ties to the disgraced former Republican superlobbyist has paid tens of thousands of dollars to a legal firm specializing in forensic data recovery.

Since April, Rep. Tom Feeney, R-Fla., has paid over $90,000 to a Washington, D.C. office of FTI Consulting, through his re-election campaign and a separate legal defense fund he began in June, according to financial filings and a news account.

The payments were for helping Feeney "voluntarily cooperate" with federal prosecutors, according to Pepper Pennington, the congressman's spokeswoman.

Among its specialties, FTI provides "electronic evidence consulting focused on time-sensitive situations," "computer forensic services" and "e-mail reconstruction," according to the firm's Web site.

The Department of Justice has reportedly sought e-mails from Feeney regarding interactions between the lawmaker's office and Abramoff, the disgraced former Republican superlobbyist who was arrested in 2004 and has been cooperating with government investigators.

FTI did not respond to a request for information from ABC News.

Feeney attracted investigators' interest by joining Abramoff and six others on a 2003 Scottish golf trip paid for by the former lobbyist, which records show to have cost the former lobbyist $160,000.  Earlier this year, Feeney wrote a check to the U.S. Treasury for roughly $5,500, after the House Ethics Committee ruled he must pay his share of the trip.

Feeney has denied taking any action to help Abramoff or his clients, insisted he had "no relationship" with Abramoff, and the trip was "an expensive lesson."

Other participants on Abramoff-sponsored junkets have faced significant legal problems. Fellow golfer and former White House official David Safavian is in jail, along with Abramoff and former Rep. Bob Ney, R-Ohio, who also golfed with the power broker-turned government witness. Former House Majority Leader Tom DeLay, also a guest on Abramoff's golf trips, is reportedly under investigation for his ties to Abramoff.

Click Here for Full Blotter Coverage.

This post has been updated.

November 13, 2007 | Permalink | User Comments (12)

User Comments

Why are corrupt politicians always Republicans?

Posted by: Samantha Bumpers | Nov 13, 2007 4:42:42 PM

Dominos. Republicans are dominos.

Posted by: Samantha Bumpers | Nov 13, 2007 4:47:03 PM

Maybe the democrats are just as corrupt, but smart enough not to get caught? Just a thought.

Posted by: Larry | Nov 14, 2007 9:18:31 AM

They are arrogant and stupid. The arrogant part gets them into all kinds of trouble that the stupid part can't find a way out of.

Posted by: Jimbo | Nov 14, 2007 10:12:36 AM

One of my republican friends tried to say both parties were the same, but the numbers of republican crooks must be outpacing the DEMS about 6 or 8 to 1 at least, perhaps more. JIMBO has the equation down as good as MATH can say it.

Posted by: daddy | Nov 14, 2007 12:07:33 PM

I want to know when Tom DeLay will finally join Abramoff.

Posted by: War Is Not Pro-Life | Nov 15, 2007 6:31:05 AM

I love it when criminals get what is coming to them.

Posted by: Samantha Bumpers | Nov 15, 2007 4:21:37 PM

Don't do the crime if you can't do the time.

Posted by: George Stickers | Nov 15, 2007 4:24:33 PM

So when is the media going to cover some other fundraisers with the same amount of coverage that Abramoff has? Specificly, I'm talking about Norman Hsu, William Lerach, Peter Paul,and the NXIVM group to just name a few. Seriously, ABC and the rest of the media seems to buy Hillary's "I didn't know", even though Hsu must have gotten a background check by the Secret Service since he has been photographed with Clinton at multiple events. Also, the media ran headlines about Hillary giving away the "questionable" donations, but the media did not cover that she's only given away a small percentage of the donations. I'd like to see some balance here. I say bust all dirty fundraisers, but stop focusing on just one guy and one political party (hey, didn't Abramoff give to both parties? Where's the mention of the Democrats who got some of his money?).

Posted by: Lokifer | Nov 16, 2007 4:22:08 AM

The media gave plenty of attention to the Hsu donations. One reason the republicans are getting so much coverage probably has to do with their promises to be better than the democrats were when it came to 'corruption'. Well, it turns out that they are better at it, and they're not very good at covering their tracks. There has been so much corruption and incompetence in Congress and the White House in the past 8 years, that it's hard not to laugh at the arrogance of those involved.

Yesterday, an excerpt from a book by Bush's former communications director (his name escapes me right now) was released that revealed that he was lied to about who was involved in the Valerie Plame incident, and that Rove, Cheney, AND Bush were actively involved in feeding him false denials of knowledge of who was culpable. This crap will stop only when we're rid of the 'holier than thou' crowd that is in the White House now. Bush promised to return 'respectability' to the White House and Presidency, but there isn't a single country in the world that respects our current administration because of the way they lie to get what they want.

The democrats would have impeached Bush and Cheney long ago if they'd had a sufficient majority in both houses to ensure it, except that Nancy Pelosi doesn't want the first woman to become president to do so in that fashion. Besides, having B&C where they are through the next election will help Hillary become our first woman president. Unfortunately, she's going to have one hell of a mess to clean up.

Posted by: Bob | Nov 21, 2007 9:49:14 AM

Bob:

I seem to remember Pelosi claiming that she would have the most ethical Congress in history. She refused to appoint the ranking Democrat Jane Harman and began talking about appointing Alcee Hastings, an impeached judge, as the head of the House Intelligence Committee. Instead of Hastings, she appointed Sylvester Reyes, a guy who had been on the committee since 9-11, but didn't know the difference between Shia and Sunni or which terrorist organizations had Shia or Sunni members.

Pelosi also wanted Murtha to be the House Majority Leader. This was the same Murtha who was caught on tape attempting to take bribes during the Abscam investigation. Again, there was an outcry and he was not appointed.

I can name other examples with just this current Congress. I'm sure you are thinking, but they weren't appointed, so who cares... Can you imagine your reaction if the same thing happened under a Republican Congress?

As for the Hsu donations getting plenty of media attention, this is a plain lie. Hsu has received a fraction of the media's attention that Ambramoff has for the same amount of time. And I noticed that you ignored the other examples that I have listed. Where is the media attention on those corrupt donations?

Posted by: Lokifer | Nov 21, 2007 10:07:20 PM

Lokifer,

Your character assassination of Murtha is as tired and worn out as is Dick Cheney's seat cushions, and about as true as Cheney's many assertions of the successes in Iraq. Try to come up with some new talking points before '08...these don't fly any more.

Posted by: bob | Nov 23, 2007 2:23:00 PM

Post a comment