BRIAN ROSS REPORTS
- Like Jay-Z + the Beatles, But Worse
- Update: Help for Homeless Children
- Bush Era, Revised -- and with More Barbeque
- The Tax Woman Cometh
- Paging Mr. Stanford: Antigua Called
- Who Are You Calling Partisan?
- Update: IRS Won't Use Private Debt Collectors
- But Is It Art?
- PMA Scandal a Sore Point for Dems in 2010?
- Down in Flames
- A New Mystery for RNC Chief
- PMA Clients Were Big Givers
- Raided Lobby Firm Still a Force on Capitol Hill
- Stanford Update: Another $143 Mil Found
- Cheney, Hooked on Controversy
TOP BLOTTER CATEGORIES
- Abramoff Lobbying Scandal
- American Al Qaeda
- Avian Flu
- Beirut Hospital Out of Gas
- Cheney
- CIA
- CIA Secret Prisons
- D.C. Madam Affair
- FBI
- Federal Air Marshal Service
- Homeland Security
- Hurricane Katrina
- IRS
- Mark Foley Internet Scandal
- Millionaire Sex Scandal
- Nigerian E-mail Scams
- Norman Hsu, Clinton Fundraiser
- NSA: Wiretapping
- Osama bin Laden
- Payola
- Pharmacy Investigation
- PMA
- Speaker of the House Dennis Hastert
- Stanford
- Steele
- Terror
- Troopergate
- U.K. Airline Terror Plot
- U.K. Bombing Attempts
- Wen Ho Lee
- William Jefferson
- Zarqawi
« Previous | Main | Next »
CIA Rendition: The Smoking Gun Cable
November 06, 2007 2:33 PM
Sometimes the music was American rap, sometimes Arab folk songs. In the CIA prison in Afghanistan, it came blaring through the speakers 24 hours a day. Prisoners held alone inside barbed-wire cages could only speak to each other and exchange their news when the music stopped: if the tape was changed or the generators broke down.
In one such six-foot-by-10-foot cell in February 2004, equipped with a low mattress and a bucket as a toilet, sat a man in shackles named Ibn al Sheikh al Libi, the former al Qaeda camp commander described by former CIA director George Tenet in his autobiography last year as "the highest ranking al-Qa'ida member in U.S. custody" just after 9/11.
In this secret facility known to prisoners as "The Hangar" and believed to be at Bagram Air Base north of Kabul, al Libi told fellow "ghost prisoners," one recalled to me for a PBS "Frontline" to be broadcast tonight, an incredible story of his treatment over the previous two years: of how questioned at first by Americans, by the FBI and then CIA, of how he was threatened with torture. And then how he was rendered to a jail cell in Egypt where the threats became a reality.
In his book, officially cleared for publication, Tenet confirms how the CIA outsourced al Libi's interrogation. He said he was sent to a third country (inadvertently named in another part of the book as Egypt) for "further debriefing."
The Bush administration has said that terrorists are trained to invent tales of torture.
Click Here for Full Blotter Coverage.
Yet, on this occasion, the CIA believed al Libi's tales of torture -- an account that has proved to be one of the most serious indictments of the agency's practice of extraordinary rendition: sending suspected Islamic terrorists into the hands of foreign jailers without legal process.
In a CIA sub-station close to al Libi's jail cell, the CIA's "debriefers," who had been talking to al Libi for days after his return from Cairo, were typing out a series of operational cables to be sent Feb. 4 and Feb. 5 to the CIA Headquarters in Langley, Va. In the view of some insiders, these cables provide the "smoking gun" on the whole rendition program -- a convincing account of how the rendition program was, they say, illegally sending prisoners into the hands of torturers.
Under torture after his rendition to Egypt, al Libi had provided a confession of how Saddam Hussein had been training al Qaeda in chemical weapons. This evidence was used by Colin Powell at the United Nations a year earlier (February 2003) to justify the war in Iraq. ("I can trace the story of a senior terrorist operative telling how Iraq provided training in these [chemical and biological] weapons to al Qaeda," Powell said. "Fortunately, this operative is now detained, and he has told his story.")
But now, hearing how the information was obtained, the CIA was soon to retract all this intelligence. A Feb. 5 cable records that al Libi was told by a "foreign government service" (Egypt) that: "the next topic was al-Qa'ida's connections with Iraq...This was a subject about which he said he knew nothing and had difficulty even coming up with a story."
Al Libi indicated that his interrogators did not like his responses and then "placed him in a small box approximately 50cm X 50cm [20 inches x 20 inches]." He claimed he was held in the box for approximately 17 hours. When he was let out of the box, al Libi claims that he was given a last opportunity to "tell the truth." When al Libi did not satisfy the interrogator, al Libi claimed that "he was knocked over with an arm thrust across his chest and he fell on his back." Al Libi told CIA debriefers that he then "was punched for 15 minutes." (Sourced to CIA cable, Feb. 5, 2004).
Here was a cable then that informed Washington that one of the key pieces of evidence for the Iraq war -- the al Qaeda/Iraq link -- was not only false but extracted by effectively burying a prisoner alive.
Although there have been claims about torture inflicted on those rendered by the CIA to countries like Egypt, Syria, Morocco and Uzbekistan, this is the first clear example of such torture detailed in an official government document.
The information came almost one year before the president and other administration members first began to confirm the existence of the CIA rendition program, assuring the nation that "torture is never acceptable, nor do we hand over people to countries that do torture." (New York Times, Jan. 28, 2005)
Last September, these red-hot CIA cables were declassified and published by the Senate Intelligence Committee, but in, a welter of other news, one of the most important documents in the history of rendition had passed almost without notice by the media. As far as I can tell, not a single newspaper reported details of the cable. (Senate Intelligence Committee, page 81, paragraph 2)
A spokesman of the intelligence committee told me last month: "We were not able to establish definitively who was told about the cable or its contents or who read it." Other members of Congress may soon be taking up this story to find out just who at the White House was told about the cable.
Meanwhile, al Libi, who told fellow prisoners in Bagram he was returned to U.S. custody from Egypt on Nov. 22, 2003, has disappeared. He was not among the "high-value prisoners" transferred to Guantanamo last year.
*Stephen Grey is the reporter for the documentary "Extraordinary Rendition" that was broadcast on Frontline/World, Tuesday, Nov. 6 on PBS. He is the author of "Ghost Plane: The True Story of the CIA's Rendition and Torture Program" (St Martin's Press). He is an award-winning investigative reporter who has contributed to the New York Times, BBC, PBS and ABC News among others.
November 6, 2007 | Permalink | User Comments (86)
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
"Torturers are trained to invent tales of terrorism"
Posted by: Jordan | Nov 6, 2007 4:53:02 PM
Our country is paying dearly for the sins of the Bush administration. This is nothing but evil. Clearly we have sunk just as low as Al Qaeda. We need a leader who will return America to the moral high ground.
Posted by: Sean | Nov 6, 2007 5:44:13 PM
God us help us for we have become the devil.
Posted by: John | Nov 6, 2007 6:35:00 PM
Except there is no Al Qaeda.
Posted by: ali baba | Nov 6, 2007 6:43:28 PM
Are Bush and Cheney war criminals yet?
Posted by: r€nato | Nov 6, 2007 7:27:59 PM
The president and VP need to be impeached and then indicted for the war criminals they are.
Posted by: Mike | Nov 6, 2007 7:38:57 PM
At least he wasn't waterboarded.
Posted by: Greg | Nov 6, 2007 7:39:43 PM
George W. Bush on 23 March 2003 speaking on prisoners: “I expect them to be ... treated humanely... the people who mistreat the prisoners will be treated as war criminals." --- Mr. Bush, by your own words, you are guilty and should be charged.
Posted by: Rick_VT | Nov 6, 2007 9:19:15 PM
I'm unclear as to whether the cables mentioned in the story have been leaked or declassified.
If so, then could we please get a link to them?
Posted by: Anderson | Nov 6, 2007 9:52:06 PM
"Torturers are trained to invent tales of terrorism", particularly under the duress of torture. It's amazing what the mind can think of when all you want to do is to stop the pain. People will say anything to make the pain stop. Anything...
Why does it seem so unlikely that the U.S. government outsourced torture to more experienced torturers? Why does it seem so unlikely that the U.S. tortures people? If we are so proud of what we do, we should own up to it.
Posted by: BigBob | Nov 6, 2007 10:19:57 PM
No newspaper has picked it up, but I had this on a weblog over a year ago
It was basically completely ignored. Unfortunately the U.S. press decides that rendition stories are newsworthy based on how many OTHER members of the U.S. press are talking about it in a given week (present company excluded, of course--I know that Stephen Grey has worked on this story for years).
Posted by: Katherine | Nov 7, 2007 2:04:18 AM
one too many times have we heard of such stories and it gets us thinking abt the people we used to trust and how they want total control imperialism and injustice for the sake of their own pockets and the sake of their never ending greed. open ur eyes to the truth, we r the tuth and the future
Posted by: Elie | Nov 7, 2007 7:03:48 AM
A WELTER OF OTHER NEWS??? What kind of excuse is that for our media missing this extremely important story? Was Britney Spears acting up at the time?
Posted by: BernieO | Nov 7, 2007 8:04:41 AM
Torturing detainees seems to be good for at least one thing: Providing tales of terror attacks. The Bush Administration uses these tales as reasons to continue the torturing, scare the public, and consolodate more power for the executive branch.
Posted by: nffcnnr | Nov 7, 2007 9:14:36 AM
[A WELTER OF OTHER NEWS??? What kind of excuse is that for our media missing this extremely important story? Was Britney Spears acting up at the time?]
The majority of media is owned by corporations. Bush scratches corporate backs and corporates, visa versa. It was not in the corporate's interests to report such an important story. You don't bite the hand that feeds you. Instead of what should be reported, we get Britany Spears, Paris Hilton, OJ, Terri Schaivo, Anna Nicole Smith and plenty more news distractions that we could do without. It used to be that (so called news like that) was relegated to shows like Entertainment Tonight and supermarket tabloids. Now it is the big news according to the corporate media. It's all by design folks! And they wonder why so many people are getting the real news about their country from bloggers and foreign newspapers. At least ABC has decided to compete with independent news sources.
Posted by: The Captain | Nov 7, 2007 9:40:10 AM
In all of this talk about war crimes let us not forget that an unprovoked war of aggression is the ultimate war crime. This country will not be made whole again until Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, and the entire neocon cabal is in the docket at The Hauge and every piece of legislation undermining our Constitution is repealed. We have lost our way. Being attacked on 9/11 turned us into something as evil as those who attacked us. We are Americans! We are better than this!
Posted by: NCBlueneck | Nov 7, 2007 10:33:51 AM
I tremble for my country when I reflect that GOD is just; [and] that his justice cannot sleep forever.
--Thomas Jefferson
Posted by: Krashkopf | Nov 7, 2007 11:04:34 AM
They brought us into war based on "evidence" extracted by illegal torture, then repeatedly lied about it. Unless we want to leave a precedent for future outrages, we have no choice: Impeach them.
Posted by: Jim M | Nov 7, 2007 11:20:39 AM
The captain is right except we are no longer good Americans. The Democrats are good Germans and the Repubs are Nazis. No? Not a good analogy? Yeah, you're right. Notwithstanding the corporate media, Americans of the 21st century are better informed than 1930s Germans. So they're sticking their heads in the sand a little bit deeper.
It takes much more than the Bush cabal to engage in such crimes against humanity let alone the war crime of "preemptive war." The International Court of Justice only takes jurisdiction if the nation in which the crimes have been committed fails to prosecute. You can bet with Scalia, Thomas et al., that's going to be the story. Consequently, if America is ever going to reestablish it's moral place in the world, the Hague is going to be a very, very busy place!
Posted by: Will | Nov 7, 2007 12:13:54 PM
The reason the Kucinich impeachment proceedings go nowhere despite huge approval by the American people is because the Democratic politicians love torture as a deniable threat as much as the Republicans. Hang the corporatocracy, confiscate their wealth, exile their families to Darfur refugee camps, burn their houses to the ground. If they run or hide, use the national defense budget to hire Blackwater to hunt them down, dead or alive.
Posted by: james smith | Nov 7, 2007 12:25:14 PM
Post a comment
