« Previous | Main | Next »

Another KBR Rape Claim Brings Scrutiny

December 13, 2007 4:11 PM

Morekbrsexas_mn_2 Congress is asking questions about another ex-employee of government contracting firm KBR who claims she was raped in Iraq.

Letters to the Pentagon and the Justice Department today from Sen. Bill Nelson, D-Fla. underscore congressional concern about a second alleged assault, this time of a woman from Florida who reportedly worked for a KBR subsidiary in Ramadi, Iraq in 2005.

"I am deeply troubled by recent reports that at least two women who worked in Iraq under contractors for the Department of Defense were sexually assaulted by male coworkers," Nelson wrote Defense Secretary Robert Gates Thursday.

In particular, Nelson expressed concern that in the case of Jamie Leigh Jones, the U.S. Army doctor who examined her turned over the rape examination kit, thought to contain useful evidence, to KBR officials. In the letter, Nelson also asked for an investigation to determine how many rape examinations were performed by U.S. military doctors in Iraq, and what was being done to ensure the cases were prosecuted.

In a separate letter to Attorney General Michael Mukasey, Nelson asked why there has been no criminal prosecution in the case of the alleged Florida victim. The woman, reportedly now 41, has alleged she was raped in her living quarters. She has sued KBR and Halliburton in civil court, but the judge ordered the case into private arbitration.

Contacted Thursday, the woman's lawyer said the rules of arbitration prohibit her from discussing the case or making her client available for an interview.

In the woman's complaint, filed earlier this year, she alleges that in December 2005 a drunken KBR co-worker let himself into her living quarters and raped her. The woman worked as a Morale, Welfare and Recreation Coordinator in Ramadi, according to news accounts and Nelson's letter.

In a statement, KBR said it "in no way condones or tolerates any form of sexual harassment." It declined to comment on the Florida case, "as this matter is the subject of ongoing litigation."

Do you have a tip for Brian Ross and the Investigative Team?

December 13, 2007 | Permalink | User Comments (104)

User Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

What do women think is going to happen to them when they put themselves in a situation such as Iraq? You are putting yourself in harms way, you ARE in a war zone with MEN. That being said it does not justify raping someone. But I do not agree with women being in the military. Maybe in a perfect world that would be a great idea, but not in the world we live in.

Posted by: khristina | Dec 13, 2007 4:39:27 PM

And the flood gates are open! Of course KBR didn't know anything about it, they didn't want to!

Posted by: cantcu | Dec 13, 2007 4:48:24 PM

Ah the old "blame the victim" ploy. Very nice. Glad to see it didn't take long for that to happen.

Posted by: 1313CA | Dec 13, 2007 5:00:31 PM

i have never read a more uneducated statement in my life. men are around us everywhere, so if i choose to go to a baseball game i should be subject to rape if my team loses? war zone or not, those men are NOT in the war. they are working as contractors. THERE IS NO EXCUSE TO VIOLATE SOMEONE, male or female, and people that think like the previous poster only perpetuate the idea that women deserve what they get for putting themselves in harm's way. what a bunch of garbage.

Posted by: kgonzalez | Dec 13, 2007 5:11:04 PM

khristina, I think that's a ridiculous comment. the idea that men can't help themselves. I think that's wrong and we should have a higher standard of behavior. Of course, this also lends credence to one of the stronger arguments against having private military contractors, is that they aren't as accountable when crimes like this occur.

Posted by: Alex | Dec 13, 2007 5:18:05 PM

As a man that's been there, I agree, Khristina. With all the raging testosterone pumping through the veins of our boys over there, it is NOT an ideal environment for women who have morals. When I was over there, there were actually female SOLDIERS prostituting themselves to make a buck and fill the need for "release". And they made a fortune! (and as long as they stick to doing just soldiers, there's minimal chance of disease.)No...combat zones are no places for ladies. Sorry if that offends any ERA advocates, but let common sense rule in this case. Keep our LADIES out of countries we are at war with!

Posted by: VeteranD | Dec 13, 2007 5:19:49 PM

These women aren't in the military. They are civilians. The military is supposed to protect civilians, not harm them.

This is just bigotry and racism run rampant under people who call themselves Christians but are just false prophets and descendants of Cain who have no respect for themselves, for others, nor for God.

Posted by: Steve | Dec 13, 2007 5:20:09 PM

Read the flippin' article! These women were CIVILIAN CONTRACTORS. Not military- a big difference.

Our military ability would be seriously curtailed if women did not serve.

Posted by: Lachlan | Dec 13, 2007 5:23:19 PM

ho hum... another day, another 3 republican/corporate scandal

Posted by: earthisnotflat | Dec 13, 2007 5:43:59 PM

khristina... perhaps the world you live in excludes women from war, but not the real world... do you know any women serving???? undoubtedly NO!... there are countless brave qualified gutsy women serving the oil corporation, er, i mean the USA in iraq

Posted by: earthisnotflat | Dec 13, 2007 5:45:35 PM

khristina, those women were NOT in the military. Regardless, I don't see how being a female in Iraq is "put[ting] themselves in a situation". Women get raped right here in the U.S. But at least here there is hope for a justice system. Should we just shut ourselves in our houses, wear burkas and chastity belts, and generally be paranoid? The fact is that a U.S. company, taking U.S. tax money, is covering up a heinous crime. They are accountable to U.S. laws, regardless of where they are.

Posted by: ex-gi | Dec 13, 2007 5:49:58 PM

Based on Khristina's comments I suppose that women can only expect not to be raped in a "perfect" world. It's easy to see how women can sometimes be construed as being their own worst enemies. Talk about blaming the victim. Maybe we could blame car crash victims for driving or plane crash victims for flying?

Posted by: Jef | Dec 13, 2007 5:50:15 PM

Well, its too bad for her... but is much worse the cover and the protections these peoeple get and being so hard to prosecute there... imagine, if they can rap her and get immunity; what other kind of kinky biznez could be done from people with that position over there. And remember: US Bush pretened to be the saviors in Iraq, but it more seems is an invation from vary points of view.

Posted by: Benjalamelami | Dec 13, 2007 5:50:37 PM

The real problem is that anyone, male or female, can anonymously accuse someone of rape, basically ruining that person's life whether the accusation is true or not. The accuser remains anonymous and is never subject to the proper vetting, while the accused's life is ruined, again, whether or not the allegation is true. In addition, the fact that these parties are SUING instead of prosecuting is a big red flag. How convenient that not only are they allowed to remain anonymous, but they are allowed to sue for a situation that may not have even been a crime. The stigma associated with the accusation is so great that the parties involved will probably settle, and again, *whether or not* the allegations are true. Do you get my drift? The criminal justice system should not allow one party of a given case, male or female, to remain anonymous.

Posted by: why | Dec 13, 2007 5:56:31 PM

khristina: as a woman you have no idea how your comment angered me! men need to learn SELF CONTROL!! your comment is just like the ideals that are pushed onto women in other countries--why are women forced by men to cover their bodies with sheets? cover themselves with full hijabs? Because the men think that if they see a woman skin, they might not be able to contorl their urges. Give me a break!

Stop blaming women when you cant keep your pants on!!

Posted by: getreal | Dec 13, 2007 6:00:52 PM

These women are just trying to make the President look bad. This is purely political. Remembmer the Duke Lacrosse case? These women should go to jail for trying to undermine our war effort with their lies!

Posted by: Eagle Man | Dec 13, 2007 6:03:27 PM

I agree that it is unacceptable. KBR should be nailed to the wall. Men should be ashamed. I also, unfortunately, have to agree that it is guaranteed to happen in an environment like Iraq. In the military I hated the attitudes and pressures surrounding women everyday. there aren't enough words to describe how inappropriate it is. People are not good, and in a masculine fueled, war environment, men are going to find a way to hurt women. Not blaming the victim, just know it's the worst kind of environment and would not advise any woman I care about to go there.

Posted by: Mike | Dec 13, 2007 6:07:04 PM

That is the most ignorant statement I have heard in a long time, (including all those said by GWB). Stop defending testosterone filled goons by blaming the victim. You repulse me and give women a bad name.

Posted by: Mary | Dec 13, 2007 6:17:46 PM

I don't understand why allegations of rape must be referred to "arbitration." instead of being tried in court.

Posted by: misskitty | Dec 13, 2007 6:21:25 PM

khristina you inquired; 'What do women think is going to happen to them when they put themselves in a situation such as Iraq?'
Is it not a woman's choice to serve her country? What is the negative regarding this? There is not one. Men are subject to rape and violence, just as women are. This is about power and control. Not sex. However, what is definitely interesting is that they are on the same team (USA). Of course, there is no justifying of any action (rape) of this sort; but it highlights the nature of the minds of some men; not all...when away from the homeland; away from laws. This is an issue of moral character. Yet, how can war be one of moral character?

I end with a quote from Sun Tzu, "War is based on deception."

Posted by: Adagio | Dec 13, 2007 6:29:19 PM

Post a comment