BRIAN ROSS REPORTS
TOP BLOTTER CATEGORIES
- Abramoff Lobbying Scandal
- American Al Qaeda
- Avian Flu
- Beirut Hospital Out of Gas
- CIA
- CIA Secret Prisons
- D.C. Madam Affair
- FBI
- Federal Air Marshal Service
- Homeland Security
- Hurricane Katrina
- Mark Foley Internet Scandal
- Millionaire Sex Scandal
- Nigerian E-mail Scams
- Norman Hsu, Clinton Fundraiser
- NSA: Wiretapping
- Osama bin Laden
- Payola
- Pharmacy Investigation
- Speaker of the House Dennis Hastert
- Terror
- Troopergate
- U.K. Airline Terror Plot
- U.K. Bombing Attempts
- Wen Ho Lee
- William Jefferson
- Zarqawi
« Previous | Main | Next »
Paper: Pages Had Oral Sex In Front of Colleagues
December 10, 2007 1:27 PM
Teenaged congressional pages performed oral sex in front of their colleagues for weeks before they were caught and expelled from the program, according to a new report in Roll Call newspaper.
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., has pledged to reform the page program, which brings dozens of 15- and 16-year-old students to live and study in Washington, D.C., while working as aides in congressional offices.
"As a mother and a grandmother, nothing is more important to me than the safety and security of our House pages," Pelosi said in a statement.
THE BLOTTER RECOMMENDS
The page program has been reportedly reformed at least once already in the past year, after former Rep. Mark Foley, R-Fla., was exposed for sending inappropriate and suggestive e-mails and instant messages to teenaged former pages.
Two Republican lawmakers resigned their seats on the page program's oversight board last week to protest what they said was a failure to inform them of misbehavior in the program which was leading to expulsions.
In addition to the two pages reportedly expelled for their oral sex performances, two other pages were reportedly expelled for shoplifting from stores at Washington, D.C.-area shopping malls. One was reportedly charged with a felony.
Do you have a tip for Brian Ross and the Investigative Team?
December 10, 2007 | Permalink | User Comments (49)
This is part of the training program to become congressional "representatives" themselves. Then they can spend all day cooking up ways to regulate morality....and spend all night violating them.
Posted by: ken lewis | Dec 10, 2007 2:35:12 PM
Nahhh, the Pages are following the examples of all the Republican lawmakers.
Posted by: FormerRepub | Dec 10, 2007 2:38:37 PM
I miss the Clinton days too. Oral sex is a very different concern than Blackwater, KBR, Enron, Katrina, Iran invasion, croni-ism, "missing" billion$, no body armor, no health care, no college aid raises, rotting bridges, political firings, Social Security and MediCare/Aide going broke, any US citizen can be an enemy combatant now, etc. etc.
Posted by: david | Dec 10, 2007 3:04:50 PM
Why didn't they kick out some who were getting a peep show?
Posted by: Ninjapirate | Dec 10, 2007 3:11:27 PM
Yeah David, Clinton's casual philandering with an intern, perjury, and eventual impeachment paved the way for a whole group of kids who can't see this as being wrong or immoral.
Posted by: omgwtf | Dec 10, 2007 3:52:00 PM
Were they of age of consent? Off the clock? I mean I believe the age of consent is 16 in Washington D.C..
I mean were there actual laws broken here? Just curious.
Posted by: Jenn | Dec 10, 2007 4:00:06 PM
"Nahhh, the Pages are following the examples of all the Republican lawmakers.
Posted by: FormerRepub | Dec 10, 2007 2:38:37 PM"
What? You must be confusing the Bush administration with the Clintoon administration as I don't remember hearing anything about Bush getting in trouble for playing hide the cigar and have oral sex with an intern in the oval office or anyone for that matter (let alone someone that wasn't his wife) but I do seem to remember someone named Bill Clinton doing so!
Posted by: Liberty or Death | Dec 10, 2007 4:02:10 PM
I'm sure all of the pages that were performing these deeds were from Texas. The average IQ of a Texan is 85, which is the lowest end of the "normal" range.
Posted by: Brian birchall, rancher | Dec 10, 2007 4:08:12 PM
Isn't this behavior the San Francisco values that Pelosi champions? What's her problem?
Posted by: honest abe | Dec 10, 2007 4:11:38 PM
More selective outrage and hypocrisy from the Democrats.
They knew about waterboarding in 2002, said nothing and now are "outraged". They said there were WMDs in Iraq in 2001 and that we should invade but now they are "outraged".
They were opposed to Mark Foley and wanted him to resign but wont say anything about liar Pelosi who knew about this stuff for months and said nothing.
Dems are not fit to run this country.
Posted by: LOL | Dec 10, 2007 4:19:54 PM
Poster "LOL" chose the right name - he/she is saying that the Democrats knew the Republicans were doing stupid and terrible things, but said nothing at the time, and were only outraged later, and therefore the Democrats are not fit to run the country. LOL! This is supposed to make me believe the the people doing the stupid and terrible things ARE fit to run the country?
Posted by: amused bystander | Dec 10, 2007 4:57:12 PM
Wait you are confused. This is the training for the White Hose intern program.
Posted by: Monica | Dec 10, 2007 5:11:45 PM
THis is an outrage!
Whats that?
It was a Democrat who knew this was going on and did nothing about it, and probably covered it up?
Oh, then its no big deal. Hillary in '08!!!!
Posted by: Liberal Democrat | Dec 10, 2007 5:21:19 PM
"As a mother and a grandmother, nothing is more important to me than the safety and security of our House pages," Pelosi said in a statement.
Nancy, Nancy, Nancy. The did feel safe and secure. They were indiscreet. They were people of low character that should have been screened out of the Congressional Page Program. Too bad low-life democrats are not screened out as well.
Posted by: Larry H | Dec 10, 2007 5:37:34 PM
Yikes! Don't you folks on the right know that nothing is wrong or immoral on the left. Nancy can't be outraged when this is considered simply expected and normal behaviour. She had no real interest in "protecting" the children.
Posted by: Larry | Dec 10, 2007 6:12:00 PM
Since most members of Congress are little more than "prostitutes" who sell votes and influence instead of sex, this page behavior seems somehow not too surprising. At least Bush knows he's unpopular and acts like it, but members of Congress with their record low approval ratings don't seem to have a clue!
However I do strongly disagree with Brian Ross crashing members parties with lobbyists and special interests. When Congress is more unpopular as an insistution than Bush, they deserve to sell their votes and influence in private.
Posted by: Chris | Dec 10, 2007 6:26:42 PM
So the Dems were covering this up. They should be forced our of office and Pelosi should resign her leadership as Hastert did. Pelosi hasn't improved anything -- what kind of a mother and grandmother is she? The kind that would encourage her children to do as Bill Clinton has done: lie and cheat; and we all know that oral sex isn't really sex because Bill Clinton said so.
Posted by: Don | Dec 10, 2007 6:44:03 PM
I think it's unfair of this website to require typing a code before the comment will be accepted. I have poor eyesight and the number "3" or "8" with lines thru them look the same to me. Why can't the code be clearer?
Posted by: Don | Dec 10, 2007 6:57:42 PM
Whats wrong with it? Isn't this the example that Billary is showing to America?
Posted by: Tom | Dec 10, 2007 7:00:43 PM
What parent in their right mind would send their underage child to DC unsupervised and working for a politician? The page program should be terminated or changed to university aged students. 15-16 year olds do not have the maturity to live on their own without parental supervision.
Where is the religious right outrage? Any other time you would be screaming your heads off about anything to do with SEX.
Posted by: Me | Dec 10, 2007 7:07:15 PM
It was just an expression of affection among two gay lads. What's the big deal?
Posted by: Bruce | Dec 10, 2007 7:25:23 PM
Typical democrats always operating below the belt as they never have too much upstairs. If it's not the daily talking points they follow it's Bubba's internal affairs they believe they need to get a head.
Never, ever trust a democrat they're always trying to hide something; take for instance Hillary Clinton's records; she's not revealing them to anyone and the MSM isn't going to ask her either. Hypocrites.
Posted by: Ed | Dec 10, 2007 8:43:50 PM
There are no 15-yr-old pages. To be eligible to serve as a page, all applicants must be at least 16 years of age at the time their appointment begins and have a cumulative grade point average of "B" (3.0 or 85/100) or better in all major courses to date.
Posted by: Ninong | Dec 10, 2007 9:15:16 PM
If the pages are doing it for their own pleasure,it is strictly their business.What has Democratic or Republican congressmen to do with it?
Posted by: pickleramoji | Dec 10, 2007 9:39:35 PM
Give the kids a break...They are just good blue blooded Lincoln Republicans, like Mark Foley, Rudy Guiliani, Ted Haggard, Newt Gringrich, Larry Craig and the rest of this Republican trainwreck..
Posted by: Joe MUrphy | Dec 11, 2007 2:23:01 AM
To FormerRepub: It was Mel Reynolds, former Democrat member of Congress, who was convicted for having sex with an underage girl. And then Bill Clinton pardoned him. How quickly some people forget.
Posted by: BW | Dec 11, 2007 8:51:01 AM
they took notes from the Clinton Administration
Posted by: brian | Dec 11, 2007 9:32:52 AM
Wonder why the pages think it's ok to have oral sex?????
Just look to slick Willie who lied under oath sayinh "I did not have sex with that woman". It was slick willie Clinton that said he did not think oral sex was sex, while trying to rationalize his lying under oath.
And now another Clinton wants to be POTUS??? God help America if she is elected.
Posted by: Ken Weaver | Dec 11, 2007 9:40:57 AM
The remark about Texans was uncalled for, who are you to pass judgement on other people - you are the ignorant one just by your remark. Now to the pages, they are too young to be allowed to associate with the degenerats in government and I don't care what party they belong to - they are still degenerates. Pelosi is not a fit person to remark about what is going on with these pages - she needs to look at her district in CA to see what type of sleaze they are and she does nothing about that. It is all disgusting and sickening.
Posted by: G.C. | Dec 11, 2007 10:42:11 AM
Isn't this the kind of stuff that happened shortly before the fall of the Roman Empire?
Posted by: K Thibault | Dec 11, 2007 10:51:12 AM
Let's see the here the Democrats control Congress now for the last year and somehow this is Bush's fault....Hey "Liberty or Death"..why don't you come down to Texas and say that so we can give you more wedgies like you u got in school..
Posted by: erik | Dec 11, 2007 12:54:13 PM
honest Abe....San Francisco values you say? I guess YOU ought to know...Hurray Nancy Pelosi!
Posted by: Honest AL | Dec 11, 2007 1:03:16 PM
WE SEEM TO BE GROWING A BIT MORE MORALLY CORRUPT EACH DAY AND THE MSM HAS NO PROBLEM POINTING THIS OUT, WHILE AT THE SAME TIME THEY HAMMER THINGS THAT COULD MAKE A DIFFERENCE LIKE READING THE TEN COMMANDMENTS.
LAW, ETHICS AND INTEGRITY ARE BECOMING A RARE BIRD AMONG OUR LEADERS AND IT FILTERS DOWN TO WHO IS GOING TO REPLACE THEM.
Posted by: ONLINE | Dec 11, 2007 1:38:41 PM
OMG..why is this a Democrat or Republican issue? It is like watching a bunch of 5 year olds on a playground saying "my daddy can beat up your daddy". Grow up people and get a friggin clue. It isn't about political parties. Bottom line is this is sick and it should stop. The end.
Posted by: willow | Dec 11, 2007 5:58:54 PM
Leaving aside the party affiliation, I'm curious to know if Barney Frank had any comment on this.
Maybe they were just improving their resumes.
Posted by: Joel | Dec 11, 2007 8:43:17 PM
Everyone seems to forget that these pages or CHILDREN (15/16) are being supervised by old pervs. These guys unzip their pants for kids and people are blaming the pages. Politics and morality are two different monsters according to what I read here. Expelling kids, but, not punishing these grown politicians who take advantage of of these kids. Take the pages name out, and, place your daughters name and see how you feel about blame when it comes to teenage girls and grown men who abuse them.
Posted by: suprmn517 | Dec 11, 2007 9:03:51 PM
Give it up, Bill Clinton was 8 yrs ago, Foley, Craig, Vitter, were within the last year. Like it or not, Clinton's wasn't against the law, Foley, Craig, and Vitter's were. You people need to read the papers more often, I'm surprised you think what Clinton did is still important. Clean up the system, it's been a shambles since Foley played "footsy" with minors.
Posted by: able | Dec 11, 2007 9:53:55 PM
Why is this a Democrat or Republican issue? Some young pages had the bad taste (pun intended) to perform oral sex in front of viewers. One has to wonder what type of homes they come from. Obviously, rather lacking in structure and morals and manners.
Posted by: †heresa | Dec 11, 2007 10:13:49 PM
This is the result of having Clinton in the White House for 8 years...
Posted by: William B. | Dec 11, 2007 11:10:40 PM
Why do all the Texans have their shorts in a KNOT because Brian Birchall said the IQ of a Texan was 85,the low end of the scale????? I thought he was a bit to high like maybe 10 or 20 points..Let me see now..Lyndon Banes Johnson, George W. Bush, George H.W. Bush?????
Posted by: Joe MUrphy | Dec 12, 2007 2:15:51 AM
It is like a reflex, criticize any Republican for their actions and they yell, "Clinton". It has been 2 very disappointing elections since he was in office. The US has abandoned habeus Corpus, and is now looking at giving the telcoms a get out of jail free card for massive spying on ALL internet traffic that was in the USA. We have genuine matters that a true conservative would be outraged at. instead we have a fixation on sex scandals, and no matter how many Gay Republicans get caught in the closet, all they say is "Clinton!"
Posted by: Lamont Cranston | Dec 12, 2007 8:31:22 PM
Was it Girls with guys, or guys with guys?
Thats the only way to know if they were democrat or republican pages.
Posted by: Bill | Dec 14, 2007 11:54:27 AM
RE: suprmn517 - "What Bill Clinton did was not against the law."
In most states, adultry IS against the law.
But then I guess that depends on what your definition of the word "IS" is.
Posted by: Deep Throat | Dec 14, 2007 1:30:18 PM
Excuse me.
My last remark quoted suprmn517.
It should have referenced the posting left by ABLE.
My apologies.
Posted by: Deep Throat | Dec 14, 2007 2:47:47 PM
Oral sex became socially acceptable when Former President Clinton had it performed in the Oval Office of the White House while conducting his "presidential" duties. By the way I did not realize that Bill Clinton, Barney Franks or Ted Kennedy were Republicans...sleezebag Republicans seem to vacate their political offices and avoid public appearances.
Posted by: carly | Dec 20, 2007 12:15:20 PM
My, my, my, seems most of the comments have very little to do with THE story and more to do with very juvenile polarized bickering. I'm an Independent since before it was popular.
yes Bill did wrong MORALLY, He was never ACTUALLY impeached, he was aquitted. Did he lie and cheat, yes he did. But does and has the current Administration Lie, and cheat, and steal and coverup (damn that plausible denial Libby), ruined this country's credit, through ballooning deficits and lower dollar value, dragging it's feet on even acknowlegment of global warming, and have/has this admin been running a haphazard war costing 10's of thousands of needless deaths? Just so it's known I think we've been TOOOO soft in conducting war and on borders. My personal beliefs are pretty brutal in that regard and not very popular; so, it may be said I'm not a bleeding heart, or a hawk. I guess you could say I'm a bleeding hawk.
Happy Haunukah, Merry Christmas, Eristide, Quanza(sp?), and the rest Happy Holidays
Posted by: Marty Holden | Dec 21, 2007 4:45:36 PM
"impeach" does not mean "remove from office", it actually means something closer to "indict". Clinton was impeached, but you're right - he was not found guilty of either of the charges by the senate and therefore was not removed from office.
Posted by: Dan Moore | Dec 22, 2007 1:29:39 AM
Cut taxes + oral sex = bad
Raise taxes + oral sex = hero
There is no double standard. Only one correct and one intolerable.
Tolerance is accepting the political correctness without question from others who have the power to shame you.
Posted by: I am not Ron Paul | Dec 27, 2007 12:14:51 PM
I can not believe people still bring up Bill Clinton's name when oral sex & lying is mentioned as if he's at fault for the invention of either---does any one know how long oral sex or lying has existed...EONS! He was not the first to have oral sex and lie and won't be the last--at least nobody died when he lied!
Posted by: Mara | Dec 27, 2007 11:34:04 PM
Post a comment
