Your introduction is totally off base. Obama's last one about being a community organizer is very positive, and calling Edwards a "liberal trial lawyer" is hardly an effort to boost his campaign.

This is a hatchet job on all the leading Democrats, not an effort by one to hurt the others.

I bet its Hillary. She is having this done to backfire on Edwards so she can steal his votes to beat Obama. We all know how sneaky and underhanded the Clintons are.

Now if that darn Senator Clinton would just tell us where she buried Jimmy Hoffa ...

I got this call a couple of days ago. Recognizing it for what it was, I asked the caller who was conducting the survey. According to them, they work for a telemarketing firm in Ohio called "Influent", and they refused to say who was paying them to do the calls. They say they work for anyone that pays them without regard to political party. They stated that they were not required by law to tell me who was financing the call.

That's because the media puts these idiots on a pedistool. We need other forms of media to keep democrats in their place. Nothing about them has changed in the last 56 years. They're still power-hungry naysayers with an unquenchable thirst for pork and barrell politics. Now they want to raise taxes!! What we want is the government to stop contributing to inflation by spending all our money. We're not socialist.

Another one of the Hill-Billary's Camp of Deception covert operations. The desparation of the Clinton regime is very evident. .. This is how their (the donors) campaign money is spent. .. The Clintons have many more covert ploys yet to be used in their arsenal. Is it not illegal to falsely represent people or companies? Hmmm.. Sounds like Whitewater.

I have lived in the United States of America all of my life. The Republicans take away human rights and the Clintons have made it clear that illicit negative attacks are the norm. Read about the Afro-Americans under President Clinton's administration. Do you need to have more written? Where have you been?

wake up people...it's Obama's peeps! he knows people will think it's Clinton and he'll continue to be the candidate of hope!

Edwards/Biden or Biden/Edwards! ALL THE WAY!

Clinton , too much deceit. Obama, not enough experience. Edwards/Biden, the logical choice!

You folks blaming Hillary should be ashamed.

I have been on all the leading campaign mailing lists, and I've gotten campaign e-mails from Hillary for months, gone to grassroots meetings and fundraisers, and know for a fact that she is running an overwhelmingly positive campaign. In fact her campaign mentions other candidates much less than others, and her official campaign representatives that I've met are honest and inspiring people.

The Republicans love the democratic in-fighting and when you unfairly bash Hillary you just help them out.

We need to ignore the push-polls, ignore the scandal-hungry media and have a real, respectful debate that preserves everyone's reputation - no matter who gets the nomination, we need to keep a strong Democratic Party including keeping our Senators in office.

The question about Edwards experience is clearly wrong since Edwards never served in the State(of North Carolina) Senate before serving as the US Senator from North Carolina. This smells like a 'setup' by a Rovian-like entity. It certainly is not helpful to the Edwards Campaign, and it appears to be intended to cast negative aspersions on all the Democratic Candidates.

It's an independent expenditure - probably from a labor organization that has endorsed Edwards.

Swift Boats to: HSV-2 Swift. This was a huge Rovian sneer at the Dems after the stolen election. Maybe Organizer (Rep)went fishing with GWB off the fantail of this boat that was stationed down in Texas?

Tactics by this form of polling are very disconcerting when they are blatantly used to misconstrue meanings of our legislators. If one were to actually do a little in depth research, and read the actual word for word content of Barack Obama speaking out against Senate bill S.256 (the one this poll is referring to that would have limited an interest rate predatory lenders can charge to 30%, amongst other things), on the house floor on Feburary 28, 2005, you would find just why he voted 'NO' on a bill to limit interest and rein in bankruptcies. To quote a few lines from his speech. Barack opens "Mr. President I have come to the floor today to address this legislation. Proponents proclaim this bill is designed to curb the worst abuses of our bankruptcy system. That's a worthy goal, and we can all agree that bankruptcy was never meant as a get out of jail free card for use when you've foolishly gambled away all your savings and don't feel like taking responsibility for your actions....This bill would take us from a system where judges weed out abusers from the honest, to a system where all the honest are presumed to be the abusers...we know that most people fall into bankruptcy as a result of bad luck...over 50% of all bankruptcies are the result of an illness that end up sticking families with debt they simply cannot keep up with... he quotes a case of one Suzanne Gibbons a woman with a good nursing job and a home, who had a stroke. Insurance coverage paid for $4000 of her $53,000 hospital bills...she eventually had to declare bankruptcy...If this bill PASSES AS WRITTEN it would treat Suzanne the same as any scam artist trying to cheat the system...and so, as much as we would like to believe that the face of this bankruptcy crisis is credit card addicts that spend their way into debt, the truth is that it is the face of people like Suzanne Gibbons...This bill does a great job of helping the credit card companies recover the profits they're losing, but what are we doing to help middle-class families recover the dreams they're losing. This bill does a great job of protecting credit card companies from the few bad apples that try to escape their debt, but what does it do to protect the American public from the credit card companies that try to take advantage of them? Mr. President, the bankruptcy this bill should address is not just the one facing credit card companies who are enjoying record profits. We should be addressing middle-class families who are dealing with record hardships...This bill also fails to address the aggressive marketing practices and hidden fees credit card companies use to raise their profits and our debt...this bill is WRONG...as it is now, this bill makes it easier for a company like ENRON that bilked hundreds of employees out of their life savings, to declare bankruptcy, than for the employees themselves....And while I CANNOT SUPPORT THIS BILL AS IT IS WRITTEN, I look forward to working with my collegues to ammend this bill." End quotes. Go to the senate and read it yourselves in it's entirety. Does this sound like a person not concerned with the welfare of the American public? I think not.

An excellent GOP push poll meant to take down Hillary and Edwards while hurting Obama as well - and ABC writes it up as if it was one of the Democrats financing the poll. You folks really are in bed with the GOP. Or are you just too tired after Christmas to notice "liberal lawyer", "spouse", "changes position on issues", "Hillary Clinton may be a weak general election candidate", "little experience on the Federal level", "refused to vote against legislation that threatened a woman's right to choose", "Obama has taken over $12 million from the financial industry and its lobbyists. In the Senate, he was one of the only 15 Democrats who supported the financial industry by allowing predatory lenders", "mandated universal health care coverage at a time the government is already spending too much money", all seem a hit on all three. It is only when you get to the final questions that support both Obama and Edwards that it becomes obvious that this is a GOP poll that aims to take down Hillary while getting dirt over Edwards and Obama.

This sounds like another cleverly attack on Hilliary by Obama..Thros a little negative about himself out there and nothing too negative against Edwards who he knows he has an edge over in the minority vote.Obama has been on the attack against Hilliary from the start all the while saying he is the victim of this and that again and again. By the way i don't like Hilliary but i am open minded to see these kind of attacks are wrong.

I like your hair cut Mr. President!?

Hillery R is deceitful and tells different things to different people to get votes.
Osama Obama was a Muslim; could he still be one??? Possibly. Do I want to take that chance??? NO WAY!
Edwards is a rich boy who says he understands and works for the poor. Oh you bet I believe that one!
I can't afford to be a Republican on my fixed retirement income....but faced with the absolutely lousy Democrat candidates; especially Hillery R; I WILL VOTE REPUBLICAN....ANY REPUBLICAN!

They are ALL lyers!
Not ONE of them will admit they are spending the interest off of SS and THAT'S why it's going broke!

They BOTH have owned the country by controlling two or more of the gov. branches at one time or another...and STILL blew it!

Did you see the caucuses? uh, what ever happened to OUR VOTE? Throw THIS system out and count OUR votes.

I am not advocating drug use but...didn't WE, the people, send a clear vote allowing marijuana to be legal? What we need is our LOCAL governments to tell the federal government that the state's voters have spoken! If you come here and try to interfere, WE will arrest YOU and put you on trial for treason! Each state is an individual and not subject to federal law unless it pertains to the security of the nation. Where do they get off telling the individual states what to do?

Since they can't eliminate old laws that are moot and old fashion but CAN add 1,000s of new laws every year,
No new taxes!
No new laws!
And turn over the Social Securtiy systems to each state where we can reach out and ring their little necks if they don't do what we tell them.

That's my story and I'm sticking to it!