Meshud and his followers are extremely dangerous. they won't stop targeting Pakistan's govt. until the country is split up and they control the Waziristans and tribal areas - hopfully NATO and coaltition forces will be given broader authority to target these high value targets...

Nobody in this world is more dangerous than BUSH.

Wait a minute. I thought that none of these people are a danger or a threat to anyone! Bill Clinton didn't seem to think so, and Bush couldn't find the bathroom, let alone Bin Laden.

Oh, what a tangled web they weave....

You can say BUSH is the most dangerous man in the world but he leaves office in a yr and was voted in twice. I always find it funny that BUSH is called stupid yet he is resposible for all the crap as well. So what is he clever and stupid.

You think Bush is dangerous? How naieve.

Bin Laden does not exist.

Bet you a dollar to a doughnut that Binn Laden is in Mecca living the life of a king!I mean--the pope is in Rome, why shouldn't the pope of the terrorist be in Mecca? Non Muslims are not allowed in the city. And another thing, if this is a highly organized network, with world wide control, as they say, you cant tell me that the government doesn't know where the headquarters are! CAVE MY FOOT!!!

MUrphy, you know nothing of this part of the world, obviously, and that's too bad. Next year, when a democrat is in office, the threat of a region-wide fundamentalist theocracy across the "Stans" will still be the big threat that it is right now...and your candidate knows this better than you do...

Unfortunately, Pakistan is only reaping what it sowed between 1977 and 1988, when instead of LEARNING from the split-off of Bangladesh, the military (headed by a 1971 war-criminal) decided to turn to ultra-religiosity and seeded militant cadres.

Bush's ability to dismantle America depends on the existence of his "great religion of peace". Keeping the idiot population focused on Bin Laden takes their mind away from Bush's assault on our Constitution.

The one thing the internet/media does is tout these people with phrases such as 'more dangerous than bin laden.. this is honey to their egos - instead of saying things like this, they should say: is trying to overthrow bin laden. get a good thing going to possibly eliminate BOTH of them. don't stroke their egos in national media - use a different method. who knows, it might work...

Joe MUrphy,
Nobody is more dangerous than Bush? Not likely,

Osama is dead and buried. He lives only in theory.

Do NOT forget about Mullah Omar.

It is said that he donned the (actual) Cloak of (the false prophet) Mohammed.

The significance of this is lost on most who are not familiar with the mind-set of the East, but what it means is that he is seen by many (including bin Laden) as "legitimately" taking over the mantle of leadership/authority from Mohammed.
Omar is considered by many to be the pre-eminent leader of authority in the reforming Caliphate. In fact, bin Laden calls him "the Emir of the faithful". Emir is today translated as "General" or "Commander" or "Prince" or "Chieftain"~ alluding to militaristic command.

DRS

So if this guy is the new Leader, What happed to Mr Bin-ladin. Is Mr. Bin-Ladin finally and hopefully dead. As we can see this evil doer has reved up the attacks on Pakistan. Pakistan should at this time permit or allow outside forces into the country for security and terrorism control. any short of this will only lead too further Terror and dismay. Without outside intervention, I fear this country is headed a very disatrous events. example look what happed today 01/10/2008. Mr Musharrif Please Wake up and smell the coffee., and yes Bush #2 is the worst thing too happen to America, Bush has failed to apprehend mr. Bin-ladin and his henchmen. Bush gets an F from me.

The Egyptian media reported Bin Laden's obituary in 2001, and in her final TV interview Benazir Bhutto named the man who killed him. Nobody with half a brain should forget that there would be no Taliban and 'Al-Qaeda' (Arabic slang for going to the toilet - 'ana raicha al-qaida) if it wasn't for Reagan's arming and funding them in the 1980s against the Soviets.

I think the "Blame it on Bush" folks have swallowed way to much koolaid. I wonder what they would do to counter the threat from Radical Islam. Bush has stuck to his principles and policies in dealing with these State sponsored Jihadist. Bush haters should just move on and get a life. Your boring jabs and extremely low intelligence of global political complexities is just to much for you to comprehend. We need to unify this country, not divide it. Respect goes a long way, even when fighting your enemy. Know one wants war, yet when we were attacked, as on 9/11, Bush went out and kicked some butt, while all you koolaid drinkers got your war protest signs out and yelled your rights were being hijacked. Your have the right of free speech but you lack the ##### to fight for it. Thank are great Armed Forces ...they do have what it takes.

Mike is not wrong. Possibly, Bin Laden enjoying in Mecca or Medina, but I am not surprised if somebody finds him in India. Indian Congress party and allies are the sympathizer of Islamic terrorism in India.

Speaking of OBL, here we are over six years later and the FBI's 10 most wanted list doesn't even mention 9/11 as reason he is wanted. Am I the only one that finds that odd?