BRIAN ROSS REPORTS
TOP BLOTTER CATEGORIES
- Abramoff Lobbying Scandal
- American Al Qaeda
- Avian Flu
- Beirut Hospital Out of Gas
- CIA
- CIA Secret Prisons
- D.C. Madam Affair
- FBI
- Federal Air Marshal Service
- Homeland Security
- Hurricane Katrina
- Mark Foley Internet Scandal
- Millionaire Sex Scandal
- Nigerian E-mail Scams
- Norman Hsu, Clinton Fundraiser
- NSA: Wiretapping
- Osama bin Laden
- Payola
- Pharmacy Investigation
- Speaker of the House Dennis Hastert
- Terror
- U.K. Airline Terror Plot
- U.K. Bombing Attempts
- Wen Ho Lee
- William Jefferson
- Zarqawi
Despite Admission, Latest Hill Scandal "Still a Whodunit"
April 17, 2008 11:58 AM
Even as more information leaks out about the latest Congressional scandal, Congress is struggling to decide how – or whether – to investigate itself.
The crux of the scandal, known as "Coconut Road," is simple: When Congress passes a law, its wording is not supposed to change before it goes to the president for his signature.
But in 2005, a rogue entry popped up in a spending bill after the House and Senate had already voted on it, but before it landed on President Bush's desk.
The entry directed $10 million to Florida authorities to build a highway interchange they didn't want, but which would open up thousands of acres to be developed. That land was owned by a major contributor to Rep. Don Young, R-Alaska.
Pursued by bloggers and a watchdog group, the source of the tiny provision – known as "Coconut Road" – has mushroomed into a full-blown scandal. The Department of Justice has opened an investigation into the matter, while Congress is debating how (and whether) to investigate how anyone could manage to pull such a fast one.
For months, no one has come forward to take credit. But this morning, unnamed members of Young's staff are quoted in the Washington Post saying that yes, unnamed committee aides for Young "corrected" the law after it had been passed by Congress. Young's office insisted that campaign donations were not the motive to make the change.
The earmarked money was always supposed to be for the interchange, but had been written as generic highway improvements, Young's spokeswoman said. So they changed it.
Mystery solved? Hardly, says Keith Ashdown, a spending watchdog whose group, Taxpayers for Common Sense, first investigated the Coconut Road earmark and took the rare step of asking the House Ethics Committee for an investigation – six months ago.
For one thing, the role of another Florida congressman, Republican Connie Mack, is unclear. Mack "disavowed any association with the earmark request," the Post reported Wednesday - yet he authored a letter at the time expressing support for the controversial interchange. He has since pushed to reverse the earmark.
"This is still a case of whodunit," said Ashdown. The identities of those involved are still unknown, he said, as well as those of anyone who may have directed the change – nor is it public knowledge what other staffers may have known about the illicit tweak.
"Other staff were involved," Ashdown said Wednesday. "We believe they didn’t intend to do wrong, but at best they were asleep at the switch. . . [but] they let this happen."
This post has been updated.
April 17, 2008 | Permalink | User Comments (19)
How many members of the 109th congress are either:
a) in jail;
b) have had their offices or homes raided by the Feds;
c) under investigation by the Feds; or
d) have pre-emptively resigned from office to spend more time with their families?
The number has gotta be pretty high. Don Young has gotta be on that list.
Posted by: The Commander Guy | Apr 17, 2008 12:11:35 PM
This is very interesting information and the first I've read/heard about it. While people are fretting about flag lapel pins, these kinds of things are going on. Thank you, Brian Ross, for the great investigative journalism. It is greatly appreciated.
Posted by: Dee Crossoh | Apr 17, 2008 12:34:45 PM
Politics as usual.
Posted by: Dogsoldier | Apr 17, 2008 12:44:44 PM
Young should be removed from office. It's not just bad to add language to a bill after the vote, but it's unconstitutional. He took a vow to uphold the Constitution, and this just urinates all over it.
What's most shocking is that no one cares that this happened. Where all so tired of the bull that wee just say, "One more thing."
It's not one more thing. It's a pattern of behavior and anti-American action by our nation's leaders and it has to stop or we will no longer have an America.
Posted by: Nathan | Apr 17, 2008 12:46:47 PM
"...yes, unnamed committee aides for Young "corrected" the law after it had been passed by Congress. Young's office insisted that campaign donations were not the motive to make the change."
Sure, Young, an Alaska rep, was very concerned about roads in Florida because his snowbird constituents needed the interchange.
What! He gave me a contribution? I'm shocked. Truly shocked.
Let's finally get rid of earmarks and have public financing of campaigns. To help with the cost, we can require tv stations, who never bought the spectrum but only have a license, to cut the costs of TV ads for campaigns.
Posted by: Stan R | Apr 17, 2008 1:08:04 PM
The guys on top may be rotten, but ABC has at least one reporter who cares about our government. Nice work, Justin Rood!
Posted by: Dave Anderson | Apr 17, 2008 9:36:48 PM
It great to see so many people finally beginning to seeing our government for what it has become, an entity of ###### who would just as soon sell their souls to the devil rather than get a job and earn an honest living. Thats the nature of a businessperson these days, and thats what a politician is, a businessperson, thats their origin, the nation was founded by businessmen. They are in it to make themselves very wealthy, its the egomaniac in them. Thats what it takes to be able to put yourself in front of so many people and ask/convince them to put their future into your hands. The best politican is the accidental politician, someone chosen by the people based his prior work, his/her legacy, instead today those who have the most money win. Guess where that money comes from, if you guessed special interest, you will someday be a part of the salvation of this country. You want to make a difference, you want to change things? What youll need to do is appeal to what makes them tick. MONEY! Consumer boycotts is what it going to take to get a politicians' attention. Stop burning your money like its the last thing youll ever do, because it will eventually be the last thing youll ever do. Our nation has been hijacked by corporate america, six people control all media in this nation. Thats control!!! For example, next time youre watching the news notice how all three local stations are airing the exact same meaningless story, almost word for word simultaneously, where is the substance, where are the stories that monitor our government. Its not that hard to notice it.
Posted by: ANTHONY | Apr 18, 2008 3:42:05 AM
This has been out for days
There were 88 changes to the bill that were approved and had to be rewritten to include them all.
I can imagine it is a mess when they throw so many things on to a good bill just to get them passed, that it makes for some Huge headache of a mess to clean up the bill and write all the additives into, so it can be filed as one bill and look pretty.
Seeing issues were changed so many times, from one highway to the next then back to the first. it passed through a few hands to get all the ear marks and changes written in.
No wonder it get mixed up
Now if they would asked the plain old americans what to do, We would of told them long ago, One bill one issue. vote on one thing at a time.
silly politicians.
Posted by: seah | Apr 18, 2008 4:25:25 AM
With bills being thousands of pages long it's a sure bet that NOBODY, not a single member of congress, has read the whole text of most bills that they vote on. With stuff like that happening, it's not surprizing that changes between vote and presidental signing don't happen more often.
Posted by: Joebob | Apr 18, 2008 12:55:28 PM
THE HOLE NEWS IS A JOKE AND QA CONGRESS IS A CON AND THE NEWS IS A HE MIKE FOR THE RICH
Posted by: mark | Apr 18, 2008 6:34:52 PM
"With bills being thousands of pages long it's a sure bet that NOBODY, not a single member of congress, has read the whole text of most bills that they vote on. With stuff like that happening, it's not surprizing that changes between vote and presidental signing don't happen more often."
How do you know they don't?
Posted by: Michael Price | Apr 18, 2008 10:44:45 PM
This is the first I've heard of this particular incident but not surprised to see it. Things like this keep happening because we don't hold these politicians accountable. If we kept our budgets the way that the government does, we would be in jail!
Posted by: Elisia Tuttle | Apr 19, 2008 1:51:52 PM
No surprise and nothing new. What would be a surprise, and really new, is if congress did anything about it. Same old same old, whether Democrats or Republicans control Congress. No matter who is elected to POTUS this year, it will be the same old stuff!
Posted by: Longtree | Apr 21, 2008 6:59:07 AM
and yes, we return these crooks and clowns to office, term after term.
"the enemy is us"
Posted by: Rodney C. vanAusdall | Apr 21, 2008 7:13:55 AM
Its quite simple.
If there want nothing wrong done, why are the perpetrators of the change remaining silent and the rest covering up for them.
Someone out there high up know who did it and many suspect, the opposition know who did it too.
...its just a matter of time before one of them jumps at the offer of federal crime immunity in order to stay out of prison.
Hang around, someone is going to jump first and safeguard his/her backside.
Posted by: Anne | Apr 21, 2008 5:33:43 PM
crooks, all crooks...
Posted by: dave | Apr 21, 2008 5:35:07 PM
Congress. Supposedly the best and brightest minds our country can elect to office (or be bought by big business). Can't they figure out a 'chain-of-custody' accountability to follow each bill on a check-out, check-in basis? Please don't tell me they're working with actual pieces of paper!?! Ever heard of computer networks with document controls and security accountability? Welcome to the computer age!
Posted by: Roger Hassen | Apr 22, 2008 11:51:35 AM
We have a standard term for this type of procedure in our fine State.
It's called the 'Dishonest Taft.'
Basically, as the story goes, someone who we call Sneeky Sam. as in uncle sam, creeps up behind Lincoln while he sits at the Memorial Circle, distracting him, and Sam's friend Earnie the ear biter twists and bites The Bill before it reaches the Presidential Desk.
This story has been going around the traps for years. I couldn't tell you why Taft's name appears in this urban myth but like all great whodunnits you have to assume thier will be red herrings and the odd locked room.
Posted by: sunny puck | May 17, 2008 9:07:59 PM
Congress should change their procedures pertaining to bill passing. One item, one bill.All their conference committes can iron out differences; that is all that should be aloud.This could streamline legislation,
Posted by: Bill | Jun 5, 2008 4:08:36 AM
Post a comment
