Bush Signs CNMI Immigration Bill into Law

May 08, 2008 3:55 PM

Justin Rood Reports:

President Bush signed into law today an obscure but important measure which, its supporters say, will help reduce sex trafficking and exploitation of guest workers in a U.S. territory.

Although under U.S. control, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands has maintained lax immigration laws in contrast to the mainland.  With help from Congressional Republicans and now-imprisoned superlobbyist Jack Abramoff, CNMI for years successfully fought off legislation proposed to tighten security and improve working conditions on the islands.

The bill Bush signed today extends U.S. immigration laws to CNMI and establishes a guest worker program there.  It was opposed by CNMI's leader, Gov. Benigno R. Fitial.

ABC News "20/20" first revealed disturbing sweatshop conditions for workers in the factories on the CNMI island of Saipan in the late 1990s.

To Blotter Homepage

May 8, 2008 | Permalink | User Comments (2)

User Comments

Let me preface: What I write will seem both heartless and cruel, but it is the truth. I am just as interested in the well-being of the Northern Mariana Island's residents as anyone else (unlike many, I have been to Saipan, albeit when I was two years old).

It sounds good to say that we are improving working conditions for the residents on Saipan and in the CNMI. In an ideal world, all workers would work in standards as good as those of the US or Western Europe. Who knows, some day that might happen with globalization and economic improvement throughout the world. Unfortunately, this measure to improve working conditions in the CNMI is, I believe, destined to backfire.

CNMI has sweatshops for two reasons: Companies need cheap labor to make their goods (in this case, clothing or other textile items); and workers in places like CNMI have few other legal employment options. As a consequence, the factories there are in conditions we consider to be deplorable, or in the words of the article, "disturbing." Unfortunately, we have little room to stand and judge, especially 8,000 miles away, since the alternative to poor working conditions is, usually, unemployment, at least for some workers.

Why is that? The gut reaction would be to say that "corporations care only about profits and not about people." This statement is only partially correct; profits are the motivation of for-profit firm, but generally well-treated workers are the most productive workers, so corporations have a high incentive to treat their workers well. The real reason has not to do per se with profits but with costs. Owning and maintaining a factory that subscribes to US working environment standards is expensive; the costs that a firm endures to bring such a factory up to par are even higher. So, the firm will either fire its workers to cut costs or will simply relocate its sweat-shop operations to a place with fewer regulations. It sounds cruel, but it's the way it is. I haven't talked to any Saipanese workers, but I'm guessing they'd rather have a job in poor working conditions than no job at all.

Posted by: Andrew | May 9, 2008 2:03:16 AM

Its all about Greed.Its true Andrew But if companies take the labor out of this country they should be taxed to out existence. Companies should treat their worker good without their workers their will be no company.Workers everywhere make companies profit.

Posted by: mommapac | May 11, 2008 4:32:26 PM

Post a comment