BRIAN ROSS REPORTS
- Like Jay-Z + the Beatles, But Worse
- Update: Help for Homeless Children
- Bush Era, Revised -- and with More Barbeque
- The Tax Woman Cometh
- Paging Mr. Stanford: Antigua Called
- Who Are You Calling Partisan?
- Update: IRS Won't Use Private Debt Collectors
- But Is It Art?
- PMA Scandal a Sore Point for Dems in 2010?
- Down in Flames
- A New Mystery for RNC Chief
- PMA Clients Were Big Givers
- Raided Lobby Firm Still a Force on Capitol Hill
- Stanford Update: Another $143 Mil Found
- Cheney, Hooked on Controversy
TOP BLOTTER CATEGORIES
- Abramoff Lobbying Scandal
- American Al Qaeda
- Avian Flu
- Beirut Hospital Out of Gas
- Cheney
- CIA
- CIA Secret Prisons
- D.C. Madam Affair
- FBI
- Federal Air Marshal Service
- Homeland Security
- Hurricane Katrina
- IRS
- Mark Foley Internet Scandal
- Millionaire Sex Scandal
- Nigerian E-mail Scams
- Norman Hsu, Clinton Fundraiser
- NSA: Wiretapping
- Osama bin Laden
- Payola
- Pharmacy Investigation
- PMA
- Speaker of the House Dennis Hastert
- Stanford
- Steele
- Terror
- Troopergate
- U.K. Airline Terror Plot
- U.K. Bombing Attempts
- Wen Ho Lee
- William Jefferson
- Zarqawi
« Previous | Main | Next »
New Iraq Contracts Belie Quick U.S. Departure
June 02, 2008 10:59 AM
Even as presidential candidates debate how quickly to withdraw American forces from Iraq, the U.S. government bureaucracy appears to be preparing for a longer slog there.
Contracting documents show the Pentagon and State Department are looking to hire "mentors" for Iraqi government officials, security personnel to protect Iraqi judges, linguists, and food service for a new U.S.-run prison, according to the Washington Post's Walter Pincus.
The contracts run for a year, and offer up to four subsequent "option years," if the U.S. government decides to use the services that long. The documents illustrate how deeply involved the American government has become in bolstering Iraqi civil society -- and underscore "the difficulty the next president will face in pulling personnel out of the country," Pincus writes.
Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., the odds-favored Democratic presidential nominee, has said he would withdraw the majority of U.S. forces within 16 months of assuming office. Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y., his challenger, has said she would bring the first troops back from Iraq within 60 days of her inauguration, and direct her top military officials to "draw up a clear, viable plan" to bring the others home.
Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., has said he expects most U.S. troops could leave Iraq by 2013.
June 2, 2008 | Permalink | User Comments (5)
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
FYI:
The option terms on Contracts such as these are normal. This is especially true when you gotta cost plus contracts. Options do not have to be exercised by the government.
If you are digging for data in the contracts, check out the pricing provisions as well as termination provisions for anything out of the ordinary.
Posted by: The Commander Guy | Jun 2, 2008 11:14:55 AM
2013 is he nutssssssssssss Time to let them pay there own way.we fight the war re build give billions and that money is needed here.Let them use the oil money and make the contractors whom ever they are account for all the monies spent.Half are IOU deals. Chaney got his hands in the pot.I odn't think the American people are ready to leav etroops in that hell hole until 2013,,,
Posted by: white fem voter | Jun 2, 2008 11:59:04 AM
Things are great in Iraq now right.. GREAT Let's get the Hedouble hockey sticks home...
Posted by: Lawrence | Jun 2, 2008 12:34:25 PM
Structuring a contract with Option Years is a normal practice in Government Contracting.
Posted by: The Commander Guy | Jun 2, 2008 3:51:25 PM
So let me get this straight. Our infrastructure in US is crumbling while we spend $4 billion per week in Iraq. What is this, the twilight zone?
Posted by: Roger | Jun 28, 2008 3:01:07 AM
Post a comment
