Gee, aw shucks... alaska, freedom, hockey mom, alaska, freedom, hockey mom, alaska, freedom, hockey mom.

over and over.

BUT, 50% of america thinks she's ready to be president. And pundits are actually saying she won the debate, WHAT?

Palin is the Paris Hilton of Politics.

(I have to apologize to Paris Hilton)

I agree, how dare Governor Palin spend 500 million on a natural gas pipeline to bring natural gas to the lower 48 states so we can get off our oil dependencies! Who does she think she is getting rid of corrupt government cronies that were on the take for the past 20 years! What is the meaning of her keeping a baby she knew was going to have down syndrom. I think Barack-oli is the guy to vote for. He keeps saying change, but I'm waiting for him to explain the changes he's going to make. Uh, wait... I guess McCain and Palin have my vote!

Funny I am not a Republican, I have been a democrat for 37 years, I am just realistic sometimes we are not at are best when we want a certain outcome.
We need to be fair, it is a serious matter not one to just assume (we now what that does)

Funny, I thought the felating media was the best thing that ever happened to Obama.

Bottom line is that Biden and Obama are full of crap. They TALK they don't do. You can find them on record being for or against anything. The venomous attacks on Palin (the only real outsider on either ticket) are only made even more absurd when you take into account the truly relevant facts that Obama supporters ignore. Jeremiah Wright, Bill Ayers, Obama's Freddie and Fannie special interest money, Resko his failure to admit the success of the surge or his ridiculous statments about our troops bombing villages when do you wake up and realize this guy does NOT have good judgement, comes from a shady place and downright lies (factcheck.org agrees with McCain - Obama did raise taxes on people making 42K).

Getting government to spend more efficiently wins over punish the job creators. I just wish McCain and Palin would make the outsourcing connection more bluntly. Why do you think people outsource? Wages and Taxes. Obama is on the wrong side of both of these.

Wally,

Don't throw stones. The investigation was initiated by a republican. I think dems in general have been pretty laid back about rep misbehavior (see the bush admin last 8 years or so) while reps have been very quick to seize on anything (barack's tire story, hill's sarajevo fib, bill's bj) as either damnable or impeachable. Heck I'm willing to call it even.

Media sheep keep braying? Pretty inventive. So in other words the Couric piece was what exactly, careful editing? Palin didn't really respond with gibberish?

"Palin fired her former Public Safety Commissioner, Walt Monegan, as part of a personal vendetta against a state trooper under Monegan's authority who had been involved in a messy divorce with her sister." I guess ABC already knows what happened so why have the whole issue investigated. This is just proof the most journalists don't have a clue on how to write stories anymore.

HOW is it possible that this is the person we have put up in front of the WORLD as a pick to be our leader????? SHE IS AN EMBASSESMENT ..... this is UNREAL....

This is not the time to let emotion rule common sense. Let the legacy of the last eight years play a bigger part in how you think.

"I think Barack-oli is the guy to vote for. He keeps saying change, but I'm waiting for him to explain the changes he's going to make."

Wait, what? Have you even been following this campaign?

Here are examples of five things that Barack Obama has said he'll do which differ drastically from this administration's policies (there are many more, just do a little research):

1. Withdraw from Iraq within 16 months.
2. Increase funding for alternative energy.
3. Close corporate tax loopholes.
4. Institute tax cuts for the middle class.
5. Refocus our military on Afghanistan.

Saying that you disagree with these policies is one thing, but suggesting that they don't represent significant change from the current administration is simply absurd.

"factcheck.org agrees with McCain - Obama did raise taxes on people making 42K"

They also point out that the "tax increase" would've constituted a $15/yr jump on single (as in unwed) individuals... that is a devastating financial burden right there. The McCain campaign dishonestly portrays this as a SIGNIFICANT (exaggeration) tax increase on FAMILIES (an outright lie).

Excuse me "walman". It is spelled "conservative" not "concervative"

The panel who voted to investigate Palin was a majority of *Republicans* not Democrats.

Read again carefully: the State Senate panel who voted to investigate Palin is composed of 8 Republicans and 4 Democrats.

It is complete cr*p that "Obama supporters" or "Democrats" are running the investigation.

You right-wingers don't want truth. You don't want to hear anything -- *even from your own party* -- that disagrees with your phony world view regarding Palin.

If what she did was so great, why is she covering it up from an investigation headed by her own party?

HONEST MAN! Are you blind or just want to be ignorant to the fact that Obama is a flimflam man that all you Socialist Libs would follow blindly into oblivion. The man has radical associations that make me cringe with disgust. He’s been in bed with Fanny May collecting 126k in campaign contributions even knowing they were in trouble. Then he helped block legislation to regulate them. He has shady real estate deals with his good friend – fund raiser, slum lord and convicted felon Tony Rezko. Interesting how the liberal media won’t investigate his shady dealings. Wake up people – McCain/Palin may not be the greatest choice but McCain is not a dishonest man and Id rather have a Citizen Vice President trying to make good and learning on the job than Obama and all his shady friends as President.

"Ditches": It is actually spelled "Republican", which has nothing to do with true conservatism.

Used to, but has not since they started spending way more money that Democrat administrations (as if anyone could image that was possible) AND they opted to simply not pay for any of it. "Let the kids and grandkids pay for it, if they can" is apparently the new Republicanism.

What Republicanism is now is religious nationalism, not conservatism. And it is as ugly as religious nationalism is anyplace in the world it is practiced (see Iran if you want an example).

I would embrace some actual, old-style, fiscal and social conservatism, which involves financial responsibility and keeping your nose out of everyone else's business.

Palin campaigns on how she's cut taxes in Alaska but what she never says is that Alaska, unlike most of the lower 48, has a budget surplus from oil revenue. She's never had to deal with a real-world budget. A smart 16-year-old could cut taxes in Alaska. Now that she has proven she can speak English in complete sentences maybe the campaign staff will make her available for some more real interviews, and not just for events like the sound-bite, talking-point debate of last night.

MikeGotts, that wasn't my post...

Do you see the little triangular arrow at the bottom of the comments? Yeah, that points to the name of the author.

Mike Gotts is right about the panel....yet the lies go on and no Republicans comment on the fact that the panel is majority Republicans. 2:1 in fact.

someone said 'at will state.. no law broken"..

that's not the argument. if it were the republican majority committee would not have voted unanimously with democrats to allow an investigation. the ARGUMENT is ABUSE OF POWER.

and THAT 'is' illegal...

"What if shock of all shocks, she's the one telling the truth, God knows democrats lie too. I really do not know how fair it will be since 3 of the people investigating are Obama supporters."

Well for one thing those in charge of the investigation were put there by the approval of a republican dominated senate. At that time they said they could do the job and do it fairly... hell people questioned the Biden/Palin debate moderator, but she showed she could be fair to the republican ticket... professionals can look past personal bias to do their job right... that's more or less what the judge is saying and he's the closest thing you can get to an unbias view on the situation (though i'm sure the McCain camp is working hard to connect the judge to the democrats somehow)... frankly, there doesn't seem to be enough of a bias in the investigation to say that they will not do the professional thing and give Palin a fair investigation

Would Obama be doing the same thing in Palin's place... maybe, you can never tell... but the judge's ruling would still be the same and investigation would still be going forward

"Monegan is an "at will" employee. She can fire him for any reason or no reason at all."

Firing an employee for personal reasons is highly unethical and is a serious abuse of power. Its essentially just as bad as firing someone over race, gender or religion. ABUSE of federal power is a sign of CORRUPTION; y'know that thing she says she got rid of. People like to say she got rid of corruption, but if these stories are true then it means she only got rid of it to make way for her own corruption; like she only cleaned up the government because their corruption was getting in the way of her own. A Government filled with mindless "yes-men" (such as hiring unqualified high school friends and firing anyone who might voice even a hint of objection) is a lot easier to control than one filled with corrupt politicians all desiring their own power.

Sarah Palin is not responsible for the building of a 40 billion dollar gas pipeline in the state of Alaska. If you do your research, you will find that she has given 500 million dollars of our states money to a foriegn company, TransCanada, for them to do the preliminary permitting necessary to go forward with the project. TransCanada is not under any obligation to ever actually build the pipeline! So Sarah Palin's comment that she is responsible for building a 40 billion dollar natural gas pipeline is UNTRUE! Three days after the Legislature awarded the contract to TransCanada; their CEO Hal Kvisle was in the press saying that without the participation and support of the major oil companies, TransCanada couldn't finance the pipeline.