BRIAN ROSS REPORTS
- Like Jay-Z + the Beatles, But Worse
- Update: Help for Homeless Children
- Bush Era, Revised -- and with More Barbeque
- The Tax Woman Cometh
- Paging Mr. Stanford: Antigua Called
- Who Are You Calling Partisan?
- Update: IRS Won't Use Private Debt Collectors
- But Is It Art?
- PMA Scandal a Sore Point for Dems in 2010?
- Down in Flames
- A New Mystery for RNC Chief
- PMA Clients Were Big Givers
- Raided Lobby Firm Still a Force on Capitol Hill
- Stanford Update: Another $143 Mil Found
- Cheney, Hooked on Controversy
TOP BLOTTER CATEGORIES
- Abramoff Lobbying Scandal
- American Al Qaeda
- Avian Flu
- Beirut Hospital Out of Gas
- Cheney
- CIA
- CIA Secret Prisons
- D.C. Madam Affair
- FBI
- Federal Air Marshal Service
- Homeland Security
- Hurricane Katrina
- IRS
- Mark Foley Internet Scandal
- Millionaire Sex Scandal
- Nigerian E-mail Scams
- Norman Hsu, Clinton Fundraiser
- NSA: Wiretapping
- Osama bin Laden
- Payola
- Pharmacy Investigation
- PMA
- Speaker of the House Dennis Hastert
- Stanford
- Steele
- Terror
- Troopergate
- U.K. Airline Terror Plot
- U.K. Bombing Attempts
- Wen Ho Lee
- William Jefferson
- Zarqawi
« Previous | Main | Next »
PMA Clients Were Big Givers
March 04, 2009 1:55 PM
The cloud of money that surrounded the PMA Group lobbying firm was apparently bigger than many had thought.
The lobby shop raided by the FBI last November had been credited with $1.8 million in contributions since 2001, and that’s just to members of the Defense Appropriations Committee. (The firm won hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars for clients via earmarks from that committee.)
But if one counts the money coming from PMA’s clients, also, that number skyrockets, as the group OpenSecrets.org found. PMA and employees for its clients combined have given a whopping $7.8 million to members of that august panel since 1998.
The firm’s operations – millions out to lawmakers, hundreds of millions back in earmarks for clients – have made it, for many observers, the poster child for tacit “pay-to-play” politics in Washington.
(PMA spokesman Patrick Dorton denies the firm engaged in anything resembling "pay-to-play." "Any projects that the PMA Group worked on were evaluated on their individual merits and the benefits to the American public," he wrote in an email. "There were no guarantees and many projects never got funded.")
In some cases, I’m sure, it’s likely the checks were written by conscientious employees, of their own volition. But some portion of that money may have been part and parcel of PMA’s own lobbying strategy. Indeed, some former PMA clients have complained of being pressured by PMA lobbyists to write checks for politicians they either had no interest in or openly opposed.
March 4, 2009 in PMA | Permalink | User Comments (1)
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
I bet Rod Blago is even more confused now…..he probably doesn’t understand why HE got in so much trouble but everyone else gets away with it….
Posted by: mjB | Mar 12, 2009 12:40:17 PM
Post a comment
