BRIAN ROSS REPORTS
- Like Jay-Z + the Beatles, But Worse
- Update: Help for Homeless Children
- Bush Era, Revised -- and with More Barbeque
- The Tax Woman Cometh
- Paging Mr. Stanford: Antigua Called
- Who Are You Calling Partisan?
- Update: IRS Won't Use Private Debt Collectors
- But Is It Art?
- PMA Scandal a Sore Point for Dems in 2010?
- Down in Flames
- A New Mystery for RNC Chief
- PMA Clients Were Big Givers
- Raided Lobby Firm Still a Force on Capitol Hill
- Stanford Update: Another $143 Mil Found
- Cheney, Hooked on Controversy
TOP BLOTTER CATEGORIES
- Abramoff Lobbying Scandal
- American Al Qaeda
- Avian Flu
- Beirut Hospital Out of Gas
- Cheney
- CIA
- CIA Secret Prisons
- D.C. Madam Affair
- FBI
- Federal Air Marshal Service
- Homeland Security
- Hurricane Katrina
- IRS
- Mark Foley Internet Scandal
- Millionaire Sex Scandal
- Nigerian E-mail Scams
- Norman Hsu, Clinton Fundraiser
- NSA: Wiretapping
- Osama bin Laden
- Payola
- Pharmacy Investigation
- PMA
- Speaker of the House Dennis Hastert
- Stanford
- Steele
- Terror
- Troopergate
- U.K. Airline Terror Plot
- U.K. Bombing Attempts
- Wen Ho Lee
- William Jefferson
- Zarqawi
« Previous | Main | Next »
PMA Scandal a Sore Point for Dems in 2010?
Email
Print
ShareMarch 05, 2009 1:35 PM
Will the PMA lobbying scandal will be an issue in the 2010 midterm elections? asks the Hill newspaper. For years, millions from PMA and its clients flowed to campaign coffers, predominantly Democrats.
Looks like the GOP is trying to make it so: the Hill says Republicans have mail already going out attacking three dozen House Dems who voted against a congressional ethics investigation of the matter.
Last night's Dem-heavy vote against stripping earmarks for PMA clients from a spending bill bolstered the storyline that Dems are tied to the group, as the conservative National Review shows.
March 5, 2009 in PMA | Permalink | User Comments (0)
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
Post a comment
