The Note
Washington's Original and Most Influential Tipsheet

Rick Klein is ABC News' Senior Political Reporter and author of The Note's morning look at the upcoming day in politics. Throughout the day, ABC News' political team contributes to The Note with the very latest news and analysis from the nation's capital.

To email Rick Klein, click here.

November 2009
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30

« Previous | Main | Next »

The Note, 12/03/08: New Hopes

December 03, 2008 8:25 AM

By Rick Klein with Hope Ditto

Fresh from the glow of their historic electoral sweep, Democrats are getting a glimpse of their own limits.

President-elect Barack Obama’s pull wasn’t enough to bring out voters in Georgia one more time, for one more Senate seat. On the Hill, Democratic leaders are retooling a political jalopy -- an unpopular measure, designed to boost unpopular companies, that might work as well as the electric car (photo-op road trips in hybrids notwithstanding).

Nm_chambliss_081203_main_2 

A pitch-perfect transition is showing some signs of strain, with Latino groups not satisfied if Bill Richardson (getting tapped for Commerce Wednesday) is the only Latino in the Cabinet. (Quick -- which ethnic group would Democrats most like to lock down long-term after last month’s election?) 

And former Gov. Jeb Bush, R-Fla., is putting himself in the mix for an unexpectedly open Senate seat in 2010.

“I am going to think about it for the next month or so,” the former governor e-mails The Note.

Suddenly, it’s not a terrible time to be a Republican.

For starters, the GOP has its bulwark: There will not be 60 members of the Senate Democratic caucus (and there probably won’t be 59, either). 

It was a blowout in Georgia, as Sen. Saxby Chambliss, R-Ga., coasted over Democrat Jim Martin: “Democrats who turned out last month in enthusiastic support of Barack Obama apparently did not show up at the polls on Tuesday,” Robbie Brown and Carl Hulse write for The New York Times. “Mr. Chambliss’s victory ends at least for this year the Democratic push to reach the 60-vote milestone, though the party is holding out hope that a victory in the continuing Minnesota recount will give them 59 seats in the Senate.”

Surprise -- the Obama effect just may not be the same without Barack Obama on the ballot, or without Obama himself campaigning in person for a candidate: “Chambliss’s margin of victory looks to exceed almost all runoff polling on the race, suggesting that the turnout models used in the polling overshot Democratic turnout without President-elect Obama on the ballot,” The Hill’s Aaron Blake reports.

“Republicans still know how to win an election,” said RNC Chairman Mike Duncan. 

“Republicans could take some solace in the fact that Georgia once again would represent the beginning of a comeback,” said Sen. Jon Kyl, R-Ariz. 

Let’s not get carried away -- but for a demoralized party that’s looking for something to build on, this might represent something. At the very least, it guarantees that Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell will be the most powerful Republican in the nation for at least the next two years.

(And now that 60 is out of the question, what will the appetite be for a prolonged fight over No. 59?)

As for Obama’s role in Georgia, history will record a careful play: “Obama tip-toed into the race, but never became fully involved. He recorded a radio ad for Martin and an automated ‘robo’ call, but declined an invitation to come to Georgia and campaign for his fellow Democrat. Many of his campaign volunteers came to Georgia to help the Martin effort,” Jim Tharpe writes in the Atlanta Journal-Constitution.

Turning to the auto bailout -- still a more than decent chance this spills well into next year.

“President-elect Barack Obama's administration-in-waiting is quietly exploring options for negotiating a bailout of the ailing auto industry when the Democrat takes office in January,” Time’s Jay Newton-Small reports. “While no one is ruling out the possibility of Congress appropriating money next week, a senior Obama aide told TIME, there is a sense that a comprehensive solution is unlikely to come from whatever legislative action Congress may take before the end of the year.”

It’s looking like one more try in a lame-duck Congress: “There are no legislative details and he has not yet read through the Big Three proposals or heard the auto CEOs' collective mea culpa later this week, but Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said today he will put an auto industry rescue package (details tbd) on the Senate floor next Monday,” per ABC’s Z. Byron Wolf. 

“Differences remain with the White House over how to finance any bailout. But the speaker said she had discussed the issue with President Bush Monday, and sent a letter to House members Tuesday evening, laying the groundwork for calling Congress back next week,” per Politico’s David Rogers. “For both Pelosi and the White House, much depends still on Senate and House committee hearings Thursday and Friday.” 

“The Bush administration and Democratic leaders are at a stalemate over where the money would come from, and some Republicans still believe letting the automakers file for bankruptcy is a better option than sending taxpayer dollars their way in a troubled economy,” The Hill’s Silla Brush reports. 

It won’t be pretty: “Government leaders know that if they provide a bailout without wringing sufficient concessions from all of the parties, they will be publicly vilified and punished in the next election,” Steven Pearlstein writes in his Wall Street Journal column. “In truth, there's not much doubt that the government is going to step in here, just as it has done with the financial system. The consequences of doing nothing -- for the economy, for government revenue, for the political and social fabric -- are just too great. The only questions concern the size of the bailout and what form it will take.” 

Among the possibilities: “The urgent call for help comes as lawmakers have begun reaching out to Wall Street experts to explore how the government could help the companies prepare bankruptcy filings that would take them in and out of Chapter 11 protection quickly, with much of the financing and other restructuring measures worked out with creditors in advance, people familiar with the matter said,” The Wall Street Journal reports. “In the past several days, congressional representatives have met with bankers and bankruptcy experts to discuss the possibility of a so-called prearranged bankruptcy for either GM or Chrysler.” 

“The automakers' plans will be reviewed during Congressional hearings on Thursday and Friday and their performance and the taste it leaves could determine if lawmakers can pass legislation when they return to Capitol Hill next week,” ABC’s Alice Gomstyn, Jonathan Karl and Z. Byron Wolf report. 

Anyone spy a GOP opportunity? “Republicans can begin to regain their reputation as guardians of the taxpayers and smart stewards of the economy by following Nancy Reagan’s advice: just say no,” Jennifer Rubin blogs.   

Beyond the bailout, quick action planned for January on the Hill: “Democratic congressional leaders, eager to trumpet that change has come to Washington, are looking to enact quickly a series of popular bills in January in such areas as renewable energy, children's health care and embryonic stem-cell research,” The Wall Street Journal’s Naftali Bendavid reports.

“The top priority remains an economic stimulus package. But Democrats also want to tackle rapidly an array of bills they consider ‘low-hanging fruit,’ ” Bendavid writes. “The goal is to send a message to voters that Democrats have delivered on the change they promised.”

One piece of action that won’t happen: “President-elect Barack Obama has quietly shelved a proposal to slap oil and natural gas companies with a new windfall profits tax,” David Ivanovich writes for the Houston Chronicle. “An aide for the transition team acknowledged the policy shift Tuesday, after a small-business group discovered the proposal -- touted throughout much of the campaign -- had been dropped from the incoming administration’s Web site.” 

On tap Wednesday in transition-land: an 11:40 am ET press conference in Chicago, where Gov. Bill Richardson, D-N.M., will be introduced as Obama’s nominee for Secretary of Commerce.

“Richardson made no secret of his desire to return to Washington after Obama's election, as he was entering his seventh year as governor,” The Washington Post’s Chris Cillizza writes. “He is the first Hispanic to be selected for Obama's Cabinet. Should Richardson be confirmed as commerce secretary, New Mexico Lt. Gov. Diane Denish (D) would take over as the state's chief executive until Richardson's term runs out in two years.” 

ABC’s Jake Tapper: “This brings to three the total number of primary opponents Mr. Obama has officially moved to put in his cabinet, including Vice President-elect Biden and Secretary of State nominee Hillary Clinton.”

Cue the tensions: “Bill Richardson’s nomination as Commerce secretary won’t satisfy top Latino lawmakers, who sent President-elect Barack Obama’s transition office a letter yesterday afternoon recommending a slate of 14 Hispanics for the remaining eight Cabinet slots,” Bloomberg’s Hans Nichols writes. 

As for Hillary -- there wasn’t a chance this would be easy, was there?

“Senate Democrats were working Tuesday to put together legislation making it possible for Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton to become secretary of state despite a constitutional clause that some critics argue should bar her from joining the cabinet,” Peter Baker reports for The New York Times. “The issue may seem esoteric but it generated attention Tuesday among legal scholars and bloggers arguing over whether it would be unconstitutional for Mrs. Clinton to serve as President-elect Barack Obama’s secretary of state because the salary for her new office was increased while she served in the Senate.”

Assuming it works out (safe bet): “Clinton’s planned ascension to Foggy Bottom is the culmination of a strenuous effort over the past several months to fashion a next act in a career that long has been defined by two distinct halves: flamboyant celebrity on one side and dogged, often lonely, distance runner on the other,” John F. Harris and Glenn Thrush write for Politico. 

Joe Biden’s day, per the transition office: “Vice President-elect Biden will be in Washington D.C. for a briefing by the Commission on the Prevention of Weapons of Mass Destruction Proliferation and Terrorism, led by former Senators Bob Graham of Florida and Jim Talent of Missouri. The Vice President-elect will be joined at the meeting by Arizona Governor Janet Napolitano, who President-elect Obama announced on Monday will be nominated as Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security.”

And -- Senator Bush? The retirement of Sen. Mel Martinez, R-Fla., means an open seat for the GOP to defend in 2010 -- but may give the party a better chance to hold on to it. 

“I am considering it,” Jeb Bush e-mails Politico, Carol E. Lee and Jonathan Martin report.

“Bush allies say he is seriously considering it, despite his image as hard-charging executive rather than compromising legislator,” Adam C. Smith writes in the St. Petersburg Times. “He remains focused on the important policy issues facing our country in these challenging times, chiefly education reform,” a Bush spokeswoman said. “Gov. Bush hopes to play a constructive role in the future of the party, advocating ideas and policies to get the conservative cause back on track.” 

“An affirmative decision from Bush would likely clear the field of Republican, if not Democratic, candidates,” Michael C. Bender reports for the Palm Beach Post.

Keeping up the fight, in Minnesota: “Franken unexpectedly picked up 37 votes due to a combined machine malfunction and human error on Election Day that left 171 Maplewood ballots safe, secure but uncounted until Tuesday's final day of recounting in Ramsey County,” Mike Kaszuba and Curt Brown write for the Minneapolis Star-Tribune. “By the end of Tuesday, with 93 percent of the total vote recounted, the Republican's lead stood at 303 votes with the state Canvassing Board set to finalize results Dec. 16. More than 6,000 ballots have been challenged by the two campaigns, with Coleman challenging 183 more than Franken.” 

“The day's other news -- which Franken's campaign quickly described as a ‘breakthrough’ -- came when [Secretary of State Mark] Ritchie's office asked local election officials to examine an estimated 12,000 rejected absentee ballots and determine whether their rejection fell under one of four reasons for rejection defined in state law,” they write.

Our new format:

The Note has a new format and a new online look starting this week. The morning Note will continue to serve as a tipsheet that lays out the day ahead in politics, publishing every weekday morning, though it will typically be shorter than it was during the election season. The Note’s “Must-Reads” will continue to provide an early set of links to the stories that are likely to drive the day.

Both products will live on the new Note blog, which will be updated throughout the day with the latest reporting from ABC News’ political unit and reporters.

Bookmark the link below to get The Note’s daily morning analysis:
http://blogs.abcnews.com/thenote/the_note/index.html

And for up-to-the-minute political updates check out The Note’s new blog . . . all day every day:
http://blogs.abcnews.com/thenote/

December 3, 2008 in The Note | Permalink | Share | User Comments (45)

User Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

The "Democratic Party Leadership" and Obama need to know that in my opinion the recent election results were not a rush to liberalism but a pragmatic shift in many areas:

Foreign Policy is broken - Republican ideas failed so fix it only really as far as the application of force is concerned.

Economic Policy is broken - Republican ideas failed so fix it but bailouts and handing out money aren't the answer as a rule.

Health Care is broken - Republican ideas failed so fix it but don't create entitlements based on specific diseases or conditions.

Seems kinda broad but I don't think it is.

Posted by: Mr. Coffee | Dec 3, 2008 8:42:45 AM

Everyone reading Tea leaves. Now this is the silly season.

Posted by: Thinking | Dec 3, 2008 9:23:55 AM

I am very happy with what our President-elect has been doing so far. He is not taking his new role lightly. He is not doing this to make himself look good for his daddy. He is trying to make a difference to our country. If he makes mistakes, he is only human. But I feel his heart is in the right place. He will always do his best. His quote from Truman, "The buck stops here", is exactly what I have been waiting for a very long time to hear from our nation's top leader.

Posted by: scentsofroses | Dec 3, 2008 9:25:51 AM

Where's the "Kicker"? I always looked forward to the end where the lighthearted stuff was.

Posted by: Myles Marcovitch | Dec 3, 2008 9:27:26 AM

Rick, our morning buddy, stop this nonsense. If Chambliss had reached his 50% on Nov. 4 and retained his seat, not an eye would have been raised. Georgians fired Max Cleland because they bought that he was hooked to Osama bin Laden by none other than Chambliss. No matter what the people of GA do or Chambliss does, he is forever stained with the disgusting campaign he ran in 2002. As for the rest of your morning post: Mr. Obama is not yet president and the Senate is out of session. Trying to determine what the public will react to in total absence of anything substantive is pissing in the wind.

Posted by: Slow News Day Rick? | Dec 3, 2008 9:37:46 AM

Thank God the socialist, robin hood democrats who got us into this mess don't have total control.

Posted by: dave-kc | Dec 3, 2008 9:42:25 AM

Republicans shouldn't get too excited about re-electing an incumbent in the Deep South, their only remaining geographical base (unless you include the Prairie Dog states). They've lost 13 Senate seats in the last 2 elections, while the Democrats lost none, zero, nada. Unprecedented. And I love their opposition to helping restart the economy. I hope they'll keep it up, now that they don't have the votes to block needed change. Anyone remember Herbert Hoover and the following 30 years?

Posted by: tmginnova | Dec 3, 2008 9:49:25 AM

scentsofroses

If only I could be as drunk on the obama-kool-aid as you are, then maybe I could be smelling roses all day, too.
BO has said he will make our military DRASTICALLY smaller by cutting funds, and during an interview in san francisco last year he said "in my administration energy prices will skyrocket". (to combat global climate change)

Remember, BO is a limousine liberal who will fly on private jets, stay at 5-star hotels, drive luxury SUV's, eat at 5-star restaurants, have 3 homes, but will expect the rest of us to live like the indians used to.

Posted by: KeepTheChange | Dec 3, 2008 9:51:53 AM

scentsofroses since Obama has not yet taken office he really has not done anything but show the world that he is all about politics as usual.Just wait until he takes office and starts giving those who voted for him what they deserve then you can judge his term.I myself will pray that GOD protects those smart enough not to have voted for Obama from the TAX and SPEND Frenzy that Obama is promising even before he takes office.He wants to SPEND half a TRILLION dollars to stimulate the Economy and that is on top of the other wild SPENDING SPREES that him and his minions want to impose upon the tax payers of this Nation.So you had better save what you can now because when he takes office no one will have anything left to save.

Posted by: Jesse Tomblin | Dec 3, 2008 9:57:54 AM

I saw a picture of Chambliss. Looks like somebody put a white wig on a pig, stood it up on its hind legs and stuffed it into a suit. A pork perfect
Southern Republican Senator!

Posted by: Bill in NC | Dec 3, 2008 10:11:06 AM

KeepTheChange -- Is that the best critique you can come up, made-up stuff about military weakness (which must be why Sec. Gates and Gen. Jones signed up to work with Obama, huh?) and having Americans live like "indians"? You left out the usual right wing claptrap about marxists and Muslims under every bed. That kind of nonsense didn't impress anybody during the election and it won't now. Jesse -- If you're so concerned about spending sprees, I don't suppose you noticed the debt left us by W. And he did that while allowing the economy to sink into crisis. Obama, with the American people's support, will try to get us out of that mess, with or without your help.

Posted by: tmginnova | Dec 3, 2008 10:27:47 AM

Go Sarah, Go Sarah

Posted by: respectfulcitizen | Dec 3, 2008 10:30:42 AM

tmginnova

What are you disputing regarding what I said about BO????
The fact that he gave a speech in oregon and told the adoring crowd "Americans can't keep driving their SUV's, keep their thermostats on 70 degrees and think the world is not going to care" shows where his loyalties are. This is the far-left mentality BO possesses, as does the rest of "one world order", anti-American liberals.
Nevermind that limousine liberals like Al Gore have 5 houses, private jets, private yachts, $30,000.00 monthly utility bills, and one heck of a "carbon foot print", while traveling the globe telling us peasants to live like indians.
Are you disputing.......

The fact that in is his book BO says "he sought out the marxist professors in college"?

The fact that the man who launched his political career was a marxist(ayers)

The fact that his pastor of 20 years, whom BO titled a book after (audacity of hope), called his best friend, mentor is also a marxist.

The fact that BO said in an interview given in san francisco "energy prices will skyrocket under my administration".

The fact that he has REPEATEDLY said "I will cut back military spending" and "Iran is a tiny country, not a serious threat".

As for your comments about Bush, you are right he should have done more to prevent the socialist democrats from trying to give everyone a house regardless of their ability to pay. But can you imagine what the liberal loons would have shouted... "YOU JUST HATE POOR PEOPLE YOU MEAN REPUBLICAN!!"


Posted by: KeepTheChange | Dec 3, 2008 10:46:13 AM

JESSE The national debt is at 11 trillion dollars and still climbing. Bush never vetoed a spending bill. SO MUCH FOR CONSERVATISM

Posted by: BSKI | Dec 3, 2008 10:49:59 AM

Jesse.....We have nothing left to save, this administration took care of that

Posted by: BSKI | Dec 3, 2008 10:52:52 AM

BSKI

When will all of you obamabots realize that democrats have controlled congress and also the "purse strings" for much of the last 20 years? Please do some research outside of what ABC or MSN force feeds you. You will see that robin hood liberal democrats like chuck schumer, barney frank, chris dodd, harry reid, pelosi have been injecting socialism into our capitalist system.

All under the banner of "affordable housing", democrats wiped away lending standards banks traditionaly used to avoid risky loans. Groups like acorn, along with the help of barry o, are the reason are housing market tanked.

Posted by: KeepTheChange | Dec 3, 2008 11:01:44 AM

Very well put Scentsofroses
Obama is doing a great job...he is getting together an administration who are not only experienced but will talk things over with him and if they disagree will say so and that is what he wants not the kind of administration we have had for the past eight years.
The Republican Party has a long long way to go to earn any trust from the American people. Mr. Bush and his cronies should have been impeached long ago. Yes there is blame in both parties but they were in charge with a Republican Congress for six years. Shame on us for voting him in again although I personally never voted for him.
We need someone like President Obama to straighten this out...no he will not be perfect, no one is, but he is trying and this is such a huge mess it will take a long time....God bless and help him.

Posted by: Barb | Dec 3, 2008 11:01:49 AM

I just posted something and it is now nowhere to be seen.
I agree withi scents of roses.
Obama is trying to straighten out this HUGE mess left by Bush and his cronies who had a REPUBLICAN CONGRESS FOR SIX YEARS.
It's ridiculous that he wasn't impeached long ago much less elected to a second term.

Posted by: Barb | Dec 3, 2008 11:09:10 AM

Barb

Please give a reason as to why Bush should have been impeached. He never lied under oath as bill clinton did, which was grounds for impeachment.
Bush listened to all of his advisors around him, along with listening to MULTIPLE SPEECHES Clinton gave regarding WMD's. Everyone said he either had them or was attempting to get them.
The liberals scream at the top of their lungs "SEE NO WMD'S, BUSH LIED! KIDS DIED!" But none of these liberals ever seem to acknowledge the mustard gas that was found or the bodies of the HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF SADDAM'S VICTIMS THAT WERE FOUND. Saddam used chemical weapons against his own people, refused to comply with the UN's weapons inspectors and was given MULTIPLE CHANCES TO COMPLY.
Why do liberals insist on giving olive branches and platforms at columbia college to holocaust denying mass murderers, but have no problem calling Bush a terrorist?

Posted by: KeepTheChange | Dec 3, 2008 11:31:11 AM

If the people of the United States are heard by our representative Washington government there will be no bailouts of private sector businesses by the government. If those presently in control of congress and those we've sent to Washington to vote according to our wishes insist on turning a deaf ear to our voices they will be remembered at the polls in 2010 and 2012 etc. It's our government in general that needs to get away from party politics and be built from the bottom up, not just the economy. We must ensure we are in control of our future by our votes, the only real tool we have to control congress.

Posted by: mmonroeliveson | Dec 3, 2008 11:31:11 AM

Post a comment