Rick Klein is ABC News' Senior Political Reporter and author of The Note's morning look at the upcoming day in politics. Throughout the day, ABC News' political team contributes to The Note with the very latest news and analysis from the nation's capital.
To email Rick Klein, click here.
RECENT POSTS
- The Note's Must-Reads for Friday, November 27, 2009
- The Note's Must-Reads for Thursday, November 26, 2009
- Palin to Headline 'TEA Party Convention'
- GOP Strategist Predicts "Purity Test" Resolution Fails at RNC
- Democrats Divide on War Tax
- Gibbs: Obama to Emphasize Exit Strategy
- Price Tags: Costs Rise for Obama on Afghanistan
- The Note's Must-Reads for Wednesday, November 25, 2009
- ‘Top Line’ with Sally Quinn -- Inside the First Obama State Dinner
- GOPers to Biden: Stop Using Stimulus Jobs Numbers
THE NOTE CATEGORIES
- 2010
- Afghanistan
- Bill Clinton
- CIA
- Congress
- Democratic party
- Environment
- Financial Reform
- GOP
- Gov. Mark Sanford
- Gov. Sarah Palin
- Guantanamo
- Health Care
- Hillary Clinton
- Immigration
- Iran
- Iraq
- John McCain
- Mitt Romney
- North Korea
- Obama Agenda
- Politics Live
- President Obama
- Republican Party
- Ronald Reagan
- Sen. John Ensign
- Senate
- Sonia Sotomayor
- Stimulus
- Sunday Shows
- Supreme Court
- Ted Kennedy
- The Note
- The Note Must-Reads
- Top Line
- Vice President Biden
- Virginia
MONTHLY ARCHIVES
« Previous | Main | Next »
The Note, 12/02/08: Handoffs & Handouts
December 02, 2008 8:11 AM
By Rick Klein with Arnab Datta
You don't need a light-bulb moment for this one: Now that the national-security team is in place, it's all about the economy again for President-elect Barack Obama.
And, oh yeah -- he's pretty much the president now, by the way.
Partly it's the recession (finally official), partly it's the calendar, and partly it’s the particular situation of the outgoing president.
It's the flipside of the early appointments: Now that all the interesting jobs are filled, nothing much counts anymore other than action. And while Obama is in the unenviable position of not being in actual power for another seven weeks, he’s being pressed to act now.
(And his power will be judged -- at least in part -- in Georgia on Tuesday.)
If he needed proof that this is decision time, Obama and Vice-president-elect Joe Biden on Tuesday meet with a group that knows the urgency well: the nation’s governors, gathered in Philadelphia.
Meanwhile, in Washington, the automakers are submitting their plans for fiscal solvency -- this time, finding new ways of delivering their messages (and themselves) to Congress.
Look for a broad tone from Obama when he has a private chat Tuesday morning with governors of both parties -- a reiteration of his call for bipartisanship to meet big challenges -- but no further specifics on the size of any fiscal rescue package targeted to the states, per an Obama-Biden transition aide.
But his audience (which will include Gov. Sarah Palin, R-Alaska) is already looking beyond tone, to substance.
Per ABC's Matt Jaffe, a recovery package will be item one on the governors' minds: "For the governors, help for their states cannot come soon enough: 20 states have already cut over $7 billion from their 2009 budgets and 30 states expect additional short-falls totaling more than $30 billion."
Says a senior Obama transition official: "The main focus is the bipartisan meeting Tuesday. . . . The president-elect genuinely wants to hear the governors' concerns and act on that."
Get set for the pitch: "With their budgets bleeding red ink, the governors say they will argue that states are not just victims of the recession but also effective engines of economic recovery, capable of quickly delivering increased federal spending on infrastructure projects and social programs," Thomas Fitzgerald writes in the Philadelphia Inquirer. "New Jersey's Gov. [Jon] Corzine told reporters yesterday that the governors' wish list could total $600 billion."
Is there anyone who doesn't want a bailout?
"Pennsylvania Gov. Ed Rendell, who heads the National Governors Association, and Vermont Gov. James Douglas met with congressional leaders Monday to give them a preview of the association's proposal, which seeks at least $126 billion of federal funding to help states pay for rebuilding infrastructure, expanding social programs and extending unemployment benefits," The Wall Street Journal's Christopher Cooper and Brad Haynes report.
"When President-elect Barack Obama arrives at Philadelphia's Independence Hall today to meet with the nation's governors, the main question will be not whether he will deliver fast fiscal relief to the states, but how much?" Ceci Connolly writes in The Washington Post. "As the economic downturn has swept from the housing market to financial institutions to the automobile industry, Obama has begun sketching out plans to address a recession that most experts project will be deep and long lasting. At the heart of his approach is a massive infusion of federal tax dollars."
"In a sign of the importance Obama is placing on relief to the states, the meeting with 40 current and newly elected governors will be his first trip outside Chicago since Election Day, with the exception of a brief visit to the White House," Connolly reports.
Even without a firm commitment from Obama, the governors have some important allies: "House Democrats said Monday that they would try to pass an economic recovery bill costing $400 billion to $500 billion next month as governors pressed Congress for money to build roads and bridges, provide health care to low-income people and develop alternative sources of energy," Robert Pear writes in The New York Times.
Then there's the Big Three, facing their Tuesday deadline to submit financial plans to Congress.
"GM will offer to cut debt, combine U.S. brands and pare costs while Ford will emphasize hastening a shift to cars from trucks, people familiar with the matter said. The United Auto Workers called an emergency meeting in Detroit tomorrow to consider concessions making it less expensive to eliminate jobs, people familiar with that session said," Bloomberg's Mike Ramsey and Jeff Green report. "The presentations being given to Congress start a countdown to hearings on Dec. 4 and Dec. 5 and a vote on an aid package that may come next week."
"Chrysler plans to make the case that automakers can cut their costs and point to the future by forging an alliance to share fuel-efficient vehicle technologies," Kendra Marr writes in The Washington Post. “Ford will tell lawmakers that it intends to retool plants for smaller, more fuel-efficient cars as a part of its goal of becoming the fuel-efficiency leader in every vehicle category."
Will that be enough? (Will anything?)
"It was clear that when Detroit returns to Washington this week, their plans must do more than tally people they'll fire or pencils they won't buy -- they need to win hearts and minds. And quickly," USA Today's Sharon Silke Carty reports.
Optics matter: "Following the uproar over executives using corporate jets to ask for taxpayer money, Ford Chief Executive Officer Alan Mulally will make the 500-mile trip to hearings in Washington later this week in a Ford hybrid and may offer to take a pay cut," per the Detroit Free Press. "Spokespeople for GM and Chrysler declined to say how their executives will arrive in Washington, except to rule out a corporate jet."
"What's the chance it won't land in Obama's lap? "The House and Senate leadership is inclined to give the industry the full $25 billion it seeks. But a top congressional aide said it is not yet clear that a bailout that large has the votes to pass both houses, let alone get the backing of President Bush," E.J. Dionne Jr. reports in his column. "Plan B would involve passing enough assistance to keep the companies solvent until President-elect Barack Obama takes office."
Monday marked probably the last day where the transition team could count on names alone for headlines.
Of his team, a new tone: "Obama's choices signal a more pragmatic, less ideological approach to asserting American leadership in the world," per the AP's Robert Burns. "In announcing on Monday that Clinton is his choice for secretary of state and that Gates has agreed to remain as defense secretary -- with Jones as national security adviser in the White House -- Obama said he has intentionally surrounded himself with 'strong personalities and strong opinions.' And he made clear that when push comes to shove, he will be the one to make the tough calls."
ABC's Jake Tapper and Matt Jaffe: "What seemed more new than the names involved, however, was the larger concept: The group drew from the camps of various political rivals Mr. Obama has faced including Secretary of Defense Robert Gates from the current president's administration; National Security Adviser-designee Gen. Jim Jones (Ret.), a friend of Sen. John McCain's of more than three decades; and Democratic primary opponent Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-NY, now his nominee to become Secretary of State."
"First, he dismantled the most impregnable political juggernaut in recent memory. Then Barack Obama managed the REALLY impossible: He transformed Hillary and Bill Clinton into subordinates," Thomas M. DeFrank writes in the New York Daily News.
Even Rush Limbaugh is impressed: "A brilliant stroke by Obama," El Rushbo tells ABC's Barbara Walters, for her "10 Most Fascinating People of 2008" special. "You know the old phrase 'You keep your friends close and your enemies closer?' " Limbaugh asked. "He puts her over at secretary of state, how can she run for president in 2012? . . . Then she's got to run against the incumbent? And be critical of him, the one who made her secretary of state?"
Bob Shrum sees the test for Hillary: "For her part, Clinton must be -- and be seen to be -- genuinely comfortable yielding center stage to Obama, as she did at the Democratic Convention. She will also have to foreswear a shadow political operation, including poll briefings from her strategist Mark Penn, the salient points of which would no doubt find their way into the press."
From the Clinton foundation Tuesday morning: "Former President Clinton opened the Clinton Global Initiative (CGI) Asia meeting today, bringing together current and former heads of state and the region's leading figures from business and non-profit sectors to address some of the world's most pressing challenges."
Some lessons learned about Obama, per Politico's Jim VandeHei and Mike Allen: "He is willing to take big risks. . . . He is very focused on governing -- and prefers persuasion to force. . . . He isn't so disdainful of the 'Washington insiders' after all."
But how does he sell this to the base?
"Mr. Obama has long qualified his withdrawal pledge, but in the campaign the emphasis was on his intent to end the war. Now that he is taking office in 50 days, he is calibrating his statements to leave room to maneuver, knowing that some senior military officers are wary of moving too quickly and that the defense secretary he just reappointed has cautioned about timetables," Peter Baker writes in The New York Times. "The impression left by the event at a downtown Chicago hotel ballroom was of a political leader converting to governance from electioneering."
"It is troubling that a man of such good judgment has asked Robert Gates to stay on as Secretary of Defense -- and assembled a national security team of such narrow bandwidth," Katrina Vanden Heuvel writes for The Nation. "It is true that President Obama will set the policy. But this team makes it more difficult to seize the extraordinary opportunity Obama's election has offered to reengage the world and reset America's priorities."
The Chicago Tribune reports on the "centrist Washington insiders" now at Obama's side: "Even as Obama emphasized his plans for a break from Bush policy, however, there were abundant reminders that the new team will struggle with familiar problems, and that there would be substantial continuity in the way they must deal with them," Paul Richter, Christi Parsons and John McCormick report.
While he's selling new strategies: "A senior Obama aide said the incoming administration will create teams of diplomats and other civilian officials who can be quickly deployed overseas after natural disasters or political upheavals to help fragile countries get back on their feet," The Wall Street Journal's Yochi J. Dreazen reports.
And while he's managing new relationships: "Democrats familiar with the transition said the two have spent time over the past several weeks discussing the parameters of the job and how they would work together: Clinton received assurances that she would have the kind of access to Obama she needs, as well as the authority to pick her own team," Michael Abramowitz and Glenn Kessler report in The Washington Post.
Not coming on board: Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa.
"Villaraigosa said he had a 'conversation' with Obama in mid-November about joining the new Democratic administration but told the incoming president that he would stay in Los Angeles to focus on his reelection campaign and ongoing efforts to address the city's financial troubles and other pressing issues," Phil Willon reports in the Los Angeles Times.
In Georgia Tuesday, a test of political sway.
Palin inserted herself in the race just enough to claim credit if Sen. Saxby Chambliss, R-Ga., wins reelection, while Obama stayed just far enough away (maybe) to avoid suffering if Democrat Jim Martin doesn't pull off the upset.
"The former University of Georgia Sigma Chi fraternity brothers face off today in a nationally watched overtime election that could tilt the balance of power in the world’s most powerful deliberative body," Jim Tharpe and Aaron Gould Sheinin report in the Atlanta Journal-Constitution.
Palin chose the day before the election to hit the stump: "We need Saxby because we need checks and balances in Washington, and we will not have that if Saxby is not re-elected," said Palin, per ABC's Teddy Davis. "With one party in control of the House and the Senate and the White House we need a conservative who will speak for themselves."
No Obama visit, but if he wants to wash his hands of the race, try these details out for size: "Jim Martin, the Democrat trying for the second time in a month to unseat Republican Senator Saxby Chambliss, was standing in one of Barack Obama's old campaign offices the other day, circled by a staff paid for with Obama's dollars, facing a large banner bearing Obama's image," Sasha Issenberg writes in The Boston Globe.
Said Martin: "I have a little bit more help than I did before."
Think African-American turnout matters?
"Democrat Jim Martin staged a flurry of campaign rallies around the state, capping the day with a raucous event at the state Capitol with hip-hop stars T.I., Young Jeezy and Ludacris urging voters to return to the polls," per the AP's Shannon McCaffrey.
Inching along, in Minnesota: "With the state Canvassing Board scheduled to meet in two weeks to finish the recount, and nearly 6,000 votes being challenged by the two campaigns, a Star Tribune tally late Monday showed that [Norm] Coleman leads by 340 votes. Coleman had challenged 188 more votes than [Al] Franken," Mike Kaszuba and Curt Brown report in the Minneapolis Star-Tribune.
We must be reaching the end if it’s time to entertain regrets: "I think I was unprepared for war," President Bush told ABC's Charlie Gibson, in an interview that aired on 'World News' Monday.
"In other words, I didn't campaign and say, 'Please vote for me, I'll be able to handle an attack,'" he said. "In other words, I didn't anticipate war. Presidents -- one of the things about the modern presidency is that the unexpected will happen."
Our new format:
The Note has a new format and a new online look starting this week. The morning Note will continue to serve as a tipsheet that lays out the day ahead in politics, publishing every weekday morning, though it will typically be shorter than it was during the election season. The Note's "Must-Reads" will continue to provide an early set of links to the stories that are likely to drive the day.
Both products will live on the new Note blog, which will be updated throughout the day with the latest reporting from ABC News' Political Unit and reporters.
Bookmark the link below to get The Note's daily morning analysis:
http://blogs.abcnews.com/thenote/the_note/index.html
And for up-to-the-minute political updates check out The Note's new blog . . . all day every day:
http://blogs.abcnews.com/thenote/
December 2, 2008 in The Note | Permalink | Share | User Comments (45)
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
Say HELLO to those tax hikes.
Posted by: Angelo | Dec 2, 2008 10:27:34 AM
A senior Obama aide said the new administration will create teams of diplomats and other civilian officials who can be quickly deployed overseas after natural disasters or political upheavals to help fragile countries get back on their feet. What a crazy country we live in. Pragmatic I believe is the term Obama cherishes. We criticize the heads of the BIG3 for flying into Washington to ask for handouts of taxpayer dollars, yet even as America protests he makes plans to fly diplomats and civilians all over the world delivering bags full of taxpayer money to non citizens. If that's a pragmatic approach I'd rather be dumber than dirt when it comes to my money management.
Posted by: mmonroeliveson | Dec 2, 2008 10:33:48 AM
I liked the strong, elaborated, wry reporting and writing of the previous Note.
Posted by: Drew | Dec 2, 2008 10:39:25 AM
Angelo, get your head out of the sand.how do you expect to pay for this 11 trillion dollar debt that this administration created???? All these bailouts??? Now the recession, it took the so called experts a year to find this out. The average citizen knew this a year ago
Posted by: BSKI | Dec 2, 2008 10:52:43 AM
Today the state governors are meeting in Washington to ask for handouts. The not yet President elect believes there will be a need to shift more responsibility to the federal government,away from the states to accomplish needed infrastructure repairs and to meet state budget obligations. Governor Randel says the funding will create jobs, good jobs that can't be outsourced. Here we go building the federal government and taking control away from the states. More government jobs= bigger national budget. We're going in the wrong direction already and the watch hasn't even changed yet.Looks like $126 billion is already targeted for immediate infrastructure repairs. The governors are expected to ask for another $400-500 billion. Our democratic congress throws trillions around as if we actually have money in reserve. Who's going to foot the bill? The taxpayers. More pragmatism at work.
Posted by: mmonroeliveson | Dec 2, 2008 10:53:41 AM
Give em hell Monroe.
Posted by: BikernAz | Dec 2, 2008 10:58:08 AM
This new Note is a PIA to print.
Posted by: Pete Miller, Dublin, OH | Dec 2, 2008 11:00:21 AM
The printing issue should be solved -- there's a little button at the top that gives you a printer-friendly option.
-- Rick Klein
Posted by: Rick Klein | Dec 2, 2008 11:23:18 AM
Obama says HE will have the last word in discussions HOWEVER, he also said "after I discuss it with my advisors" - who will, in fact, make the final decisions but Obama will take credit for it!!! No change as far as I'm concerned.
Posted by: jill | Dec 2, 2008 11:25:54 AM
Any debt racked up by George Bush can be greatly linked to the clinton era when banks WERE FORCED TO GIVE PEOPLE LOANS THEY COULD NEVER AFFORD.
And guess what the robin hood liberals (barney frank, chris dodd, chuck schumer, ACORN, Barry O, nancy pelosi) said to any republican who stood in the way of wiping away lending standards, credit history, proof of prolonged employment as forms of ability to pay........ you conservatives don't like poor people! This mentality adopted by socialist liberals has literally almost broken our capitalist society.
The iraq war has cost .5 a trillion dollars and was necessary to overthrow a man who murdered, tortured, terrorized, AND used chemical weapons AGAINST HIS OWN PEOPLE while the whole time giving the impotent United nations the middle-finger.
George Bush has been trampled on by the obamamania media and has kept this country safe nearly 8 years but somehow he is just an idiot??
Posted by: dave | Dec 2, 2008 11:37:35 AM
So what is considered wealthy by barry O these days?? I certainly would consider him wealthy since he just purchased michelle a $30,000.00 ring.
Are you rich if you make $250,000 (as barry said throughout the beginning and middle of his campaign), or is it $200,000 (as he said throughout the end of his campaign) or $150,000 (as biden said AFTER THE CAMPAIGN)??
WHICH IS IT??
I want biden to clarify at what level of income does the gov't expect people to be "more patriotic and pay higher taxes"? Even though the answer would be coming from a man who has earned $2,590,000 in the last 10 years and given $3,000 to charity (.001% of his total income)- NOW THAT IS WHAT I CALL PATRIOTIC!
Posted by: dave | Dec 2, 2008 11:49:44 AM
dave
You have the right-wing noise machine's talking points and buzzwords down really well. I hve never seen so many crammed into so few paragraphs. But you don't really expect anyone to keep believing that stuff, do you? (like all debt is the Democrats' fault because they tried to help people too much!)
Posted by: jock59801 | Dec 2, 2008 12:04:56 PM
Jock; In the end the only ones who got help (as always) were the Clinton cronies at Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and on Wall Street. The poor people lost the homes they could suddenly afford and now have a bad debt record that will follow them for the rest of their lives. A home foreclosure or auto repo is a long term serious credit blem. But keep on voting for the Democrats 'cause they are dedicated to helping you. No, really. This time they mean it. sic
Posted by: mmonroeliveson | Dec 2, 2008 12:30:22 PM
jock59801
Spit the kool-aid out now! Democrats would rather send $500,000,000,000.00 annually out of our borders to countries that HATE the USA (which is why liberals like them) then drill here.
Also, they FORCED banks to give risky loans to people who could NEVER PAY THEM BACK. Then they wonder why America is losing its competitive edge in the world??
All the while, the liberal media is blaming bush for everthing wrong in the western hemisphere because he is an "idiot".
If these are too many thoughts for you to process I'm sorry. to me it's very simple.
Posted by: dave | Dec 2, 2008 12:56:47 PM
Dave come on the reason we are in this mess is because of Bush he has been in power for the last 8 years how can you say this isn't his fault he is the president and has hurt so many people financially. He and his dad are in the oil business they don't have to worry about retirement. My mom lost 30,000 dollars because of this recession he has caused she is 81 years old maybe the US government should bail out the taxpayors because its them that have worked there butts off and are losing big time. I'm 47 years young and I feel for the elderly again put the blame were its suppose to be. EJ
Posted by: Ej | Dec 2, 2008 1:02:05 PM
EJ : Please explain how Bush caused this recession? There are 3 primary factors involved. 1) Democrats pushing banks to make loans to people who weren't likely to pay them back. 2) Shady packaging of debt by Wall Street. 3) People buying houses they couldn't afford.
Bush is not responsible for any of that. Get off the kool-aid and think for yourself.
Posted by: howwouldiknow | Dec 2, 2008 1:21:48 PM
EJ
Do some research and look up what the worst president in HISTORY (jimmy carter) came up with, something called the COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT ACT.
After that ingenious idea, the last 20 years have been filled with democrat-controlled congress FORCING banks to reduce/erase their lending standards under the banner of making everything "fair".
Liberals simply don't like America. In America, our gov't guarantees us the "pursuit of happiness". Liberals are always trying to change America into the goverment "guarunteeing happiness"- which is why your mom lost 30,000.
Have you seen or been to any socialist, communist countries recently? It is nothing more than HUGE gov'ts, HUGE taxes, and wealthy elites at the top telling everyone else how to live. You can KEEP THE CHANGE BO.
Posted by: liberalshateAmerica | Dec 2, 2008 3:05:53 PM
Dave: My poor uninformed friend. The following is a cut and paste from a New York Times Financial article printed in 1999 regarding the expansion of Fannie Mae. I'm not posting the entire article, just one paragraph. I quote. ("In addition, banks, thrift institutions and mortgage companies HAVE BEEN PRESSING Fannie Mae to HELP THEM make more loans to so-called subprime borrowers. These borrowers whose incomes, credit ratings and savings are not good enough to qualify for conventional loans, can only get loans from finance companies that charge much higher interest rates -- anywhere from three to four percentage points higher than conventional loans.") end quote. It's now unfortunate that many of these same banks who went BEGGING to Fannie Mae are now the one's before Congress hoping for a rescue from the business THEY WANTED. There,s way more too it than this one paragraph, obviously, but you're not going to hear or find the facts by listening to the drug addict Limbaugh and neo-nazi Hannity. Whom you've obviously been listening to. The funniest part is, all you people who daily drink the right wing kool-aid dished out on a right wing news network owned by a liberal leaning business mogul, and his even more liberal son, who exploit you every day as they laugh all the way to their bank. The fact remains, the damage has been done, in more than one area effecting the economy as well as national security and you either learn from the mistakes and grab ahold of the lifeline that has been tossed to you, or you continue to sink in the morass that surrounds you.
Posted by: devilkev | Dec 2, 2008 3:39:21 PM
Thank you for the print option. However, Blog format does not allow one to return to the original analysis and access other referenced materials later in the day. Not all have the luxury of reading the entire Note at once & also be in an environment to easily access or print referenced stories for future consumption. Please leave the entire analysis with links available somewhere.
Posted by: ELi SANCHEZ | Dec 2, 2008 3:44:27 PM
devilkev
Wow, I don't where to begin. But for starters, please give me one example of hannity or limbaugh saying something racist or nazi-like. Their entire careers are over the radio so it can't be too hard to find if it exists. You have obviously been drinking the far-left kool-aid which is easy to do for those who don't like to think for themselves. By the way, limbaugh and hannity are the party of Lincoln and MLK, yours is the party of George Wallace (southern segregationist), Johnson(big racist), jefferson (bigger racist) and Barry O the socialist (you can keep the change)
For every article you cut and paste that attempts to downplay the robin hood liberals' involvement in this crisis, i will show you 10 that proves barney frank, chris dodd, chuck schumer, nancy pelosi harry reid, acorn, barry o and the rest of the socialist liberals are the reason this country has nearly been crippled.
Posted by: dave | Dec 2, 2008 4:03:49 PM
Post a comment
POLITICAL VIDEOS
THE NOTE BLOG ROLL
- ABC News -- George Stephanopoulos
- ABC News -- Jake Tapper
- ABC News Politics
- ABC News -- The Numbers
- ABC News -- The Blotter
- The American Prospect -- TAPPED
- The Atlantic -- Politics Channel
- The Boston Globe -- Political Intelligence
- Center for American Progress -- Think Progress
- Center for Responsive Politics
- The Chicago Sun-Times -- Lynn Sweet
- The Chicago Tribune -- The Swamp
- Drudge Report
- FactCheck.org
- FiveThirtyEight
- Heritage Foundation -- The Foundry
- The Hill -- Briefing Room
- The Hotline
- The Huffington Post
- The Los Angeles Times -- Top of the Ticket
- NPR -- Political Junkie
- National Review -- The Corner
- The New Republic -- The Plank
- The New York Times -- The Caucus
- Newsweek -- The Gaggle
- Political Wire -- Taegan Goddard
- Politico -- Ben Smith
- Politico -- Mike Allen’s Playbook
- PolitiFact
- Real Clear Politics
- Talking Points Memo
- Time -- The Page
- USA Today -- On Politics
- Variety -- Wilshire & Washington
- The Wall Street Journal -- Capital Journal
- The Washington Post -- The Fix
- The Washington Post -- 44

