Rick Klein is ABC News' Senior Political Reporter and author of The Note's morning look at the upcoming day in politics. Throughout the day, ABC News' political team contributes to The Note with the very latest news and analysis from the nation's capital.
To email Rick Klein, click here.
RECENT POSTS
- The Note's Must-Reads for Thursday, November 26, 2009
- Palin to Headline 'TEA Party Convention'
- GOP Strategist Predicts "Purity Test" Resolution Fails at RNC
- Democrats Divide on War Tax
- Gibbs: Obama to Emphasize Exit Strategy
- Price Tags: Costs Rise for Obama on Afghanistan
- The Note's Must-Reads for Wednesday, November 25, 2009
- ‘Top Line’ with Sally Quinn -- Inside the First Obama State Dinner
- GOPers to Biden: Stop Using Stimulus Jobs Numbers
- Exit Ramps: Democrats Grow Restless on Afghanistan Strategy
THE NOTE CATEGORIES
- 2010
- Afghanistan
- Bill Clinton
- CIA
- Congress
- Democratic party
- Environment
- Financial Reform
- GOP
- Gov. Mark Sanford
- Gov. Sarah Palin
- Guantanamo
- Health Care
- Hillary Clinton
- Immigration
- Iran
- Iraq
- John McCain
- Mitt Romney
- North Korea
- Obama Agenda
- Politics Live
- President Obama
- Republican Party
- Ronald Reagan
- Sen. John Ensign
- Senate
- Sonia Sotomayor
- Stimulus
- Sunday Shows
- Supreme Court
- Ted Kennedy
- The Note
- The Note Must-Reads
- Top Line
- Vice President Biden
- Virginia
MONTHLY ARCHIVES
« Previous | Main | Next »
G.O.P. Bigs Back Bailout Condemnation
January 05, 2009 8:55 PM
ABC News' Teddy Davis Reports:
During a Monday debate in Washington, D.C., five of the six Republicans hoping to chair the national party endorsed a resolution which would break with President Bush and GOP congressional leaders by putting the party's governing body on record as opposing the recently enacted bailout of the financial industry.
"The bailout was a bust. It should never have happened. Republicans should have had a little bit more you-know-what to withstand the pressure. They didn't and we're paying for it. I absolutely support the resolution because it reflects the frustration of our base," said former Maryland Lt. Gov. Michael Steele.
Steele was not alone in voicing his support for a resolution condemning the bailout. Joining him were Michigan Republican Party Chairman Saul Anuzis, South Carolina Republican Party Chairman Katon Dawson, former Ohio Secretary of State Ken Blackwell, and former Huckabee campaign manager Chip Saltsman.
The resolution, which was co-authored by R.N.C. Vice Chairman James Bopp, Jr., and Oregon Republican National Committeeman Solomon Yue, will be considered by the party’s resolutions committee on Jan. 29. To be adopted by the party, the resolution must get beyond the resolutions panel and win a majority support from the RNC’s full 168-person membership.
The candidates for R.N.C. chair were asked for their positions on the bailout resolution by debate moderator Grover Norquist who heads Americans for Tax Reform, a conservative anti-tax group.
"There's a resolution that's being offered to the Republican National Committee criticizing the bailout that was done this summer for the banks suggesting that it was criminally stupid . . . is this a resolution you intend to vote for? Or, if you're not on the committee, would you support its enactment?"
The only candidate who did not endorse the resolution during Monday’s debate at the National Press Club was Mike Duncan, the current RNC chairman who is seeking an additional two-year term.
"This is not the kind of question I believe you can answer with 'yes' or 'no,'" said Duncan. "As a banker, I probably understand this as well as anyone on this stage."
Although he stopped short of offering an on-the-spot endorsement, Duncan had critical words about the bailout.
"I resent the TARP money," said Duncan, referring to the Troubled Assets Relief Program contained in the Wall Street bailout plan. "And I think there are problems in this whole area."
Bopp was delighted by the anti-bailout sentiment expressed at Monday’s debate.
"There is widespread understanding among Republicans that we have to do this," said Bopp, referring to his anti-bailout resolution.
"Bush has been a fabulous president," he continued, "but nobody is perfect and this was a serious error which was not controlling spending, not controlling earmarks and then doing the bailouts. Unless you say you’re wrong, no one is going to believe you when you say that you’re not going to do it again."
In quickly describing the resolution at Monday’s debate, Norquist only referenced its condemnation of the bailout that the financial industry received.
In an interview with ABC News, Bopp explained that the resolution goes much further.
"The resolution opposes the bailout of the financial industry and their nationalization," said Bopp. "It opposes the bailout and nationalization of the auto industry, and it opposes any future bailouts including Obama's public works projects which amount to a bailout of cities and states because they would have the federal taxpayer assume the responsibility to pay for all the state and local public works projects."
Bopp, who backed former Gov. Mitt Romney's, R-Mass., presidential bid and is uncommitted in the RNC chairman’s race, thinks Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., blew his chances against Barack Obama by voting for the Wall Street bailout.
"If McCain had voted against it, I think he would have won the presidency," said Bopp. "He would have separated himself from Bush. He would have showed that he was not an insider. He would have showed that he understands the American people."
Norquist, who is neutral in the GOP chairman’s race, told ABC News that the anti-bailout resolution is important because it gets the RNC "back into the swing of having an opinion as a party" on something as central as "giving $750 billion of other people’s money to people whose claim to fame is that they lost their money."
ABC News' Ferdous Al-Faruque contributed to this report.
January 5, 2009 | Permalink | Share | User Comments (68)
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
What a boondoggle nonsense coming from some of the republicans now....where were their outrage when the nation ran up more than a trillion dollar deficit? Spend and spend has been the last two-terms mantra. What an embarrassment for the rest of us who knew better.
Posted by: ConservativesForJustice | Jan 6, 2009 7:42:44 AM
God Bless the GOP. When your new democrazy monkey king (as hey scoob put it) puts us trillions more in dept the GOP will be there to pick up America! The uhhh, andddd, Iiiiii, uhhhh man doesn’t have a teleprompter preprogrammed to make his huuuu decisions, his uhhhhh answers are not uhhhhh, uhhhhh, dhuuuu prewritten. Lets hope he huuuu doesn’t have to make a decision on the uhhhh spot.
Posted by: alreadysickof dems | Jan 6, 2009 7:45:46 AM
As someone else mentioned, all this amounts to is a big "I told you so". How about repealing the TARP act and asking for the money back.
Posted by: Terri508 | Jan 6, 2009 8:09:41 AM
What the GOP did when it was in control was use up all the tax payer monies and then some to bail out the mismanaged mega companies on wall street and pay millions just in bonuses to the CEOs and the top executives. Now when it is time for the middle class to get some left over crumbs to stimulate the economy they are saying the party is over, it did not work. Well it was not supposed to work it was an exclusive party for fradulent people. Party should be over for the GOP, like the made off with billions, GOP is the gone off with billions party.
Posted by: gjkotw01 | Jan 6, 2009 8:13:56 AM
I will vote out my representatives that voted for any bailout past, present and future.
Posted by: Joe Average | Jan 6, 2009 8:26:07 AM
The American people voted convincingly for Barack Obama over John McCain because for the last eight years the Republican administration has had NO plan. John McCain had NO plan. The Republicans continue to have NO plan. Leave things alone and stay the course is NOT a plan. It is obvious that the only intentions the Republicans have for the coming administration is to play the role of obstruction. A little over two years ago the American people tossed several Republicans from Congress and this past election several more were tossed out. It seems the Republican "leadership" doesn't get it. For whatever reason they strongly believe they should dig in their heals on "conservatism". Conserve meaning' no change. We want a change in direction and Obama with his vision is the change we voted for.
Posted by: dan | Jan 6, 2009 8:27:50 AM
When the U.S. government created social security, it told us that it would save our money for retirement. It didn't. Instead it spent the money. After it spend the money, it borrowed against the account (like a double mortgage). Now there is no money. When Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were created it was so that people who couldn't afford to buy a home could buy a home. This failed too. The U.S. mail is another federally run program, which is why we have UPS and Fedex. Time and time again our elected officials say the same thing, 'just give us more money and we'll fix the problem'. The problem is that Federal involvement is more than half the problem. Did banks and corrupt institutions play a hand in this? Sure. But even without this problem, the U.S. was already headed for a credit crisis. If the U.S. government stopped spending altogether and just paid our debt, it would take 10 years to pay off. And what is Obama's plan? To take the national debt from about 9 trillion to about 12 trillion. American taxpayers need to revolt. We're being robbed. We, our children, and our children's children.
Posted by: jche | Jan 6, 2009 8:31:10 AM
They can say whatever they want now, the money is gone and no new credit. Wow! Surprise! Wish my congress people would have sided with my letter.
Posted by: Dennis | Jan 6, 2009 8:35:43 AM
We wrote to Congress in unprecedented numbers pleading with them not to pass the TARP bill. They did it anyway. Some people (most likely Paulson's buddies) have gotten very rich off the taxpayer's backs. Obama voted for it, Pelosi voted for it, Frank voted for it, yet they were ALL returned to Washington by the voters. Our system of government is absolutely broken.
Posted by: MadeInUSA | Jan 6, 2009 8:38:17 AM
All of a sudden the Republican Party is talking about fiscal responsibility. I've been laughing so hard that I can't get up off the floor. 8 years of George Bush and 6 years of Republican control of the congress and these Repukes gave us the largest deficits in the history of the country, put us into two recessions and possibly a depression. Now all of a sudden they became smart about the economy. Sheesh, what a bunch of frauds. The GOP should be embarrased.
Posted by: Drew Hoffman | Jan 6, 2009 8:48:47 AM
EVERYONE INCLUDING BUSH KNEW THE BAILOUT WOULD NOT WORK. IT WAS A WAY TO HELP ALL HIS RICH FRIENDS BEFORE HE LEFT OFFICE. HE KNOWS THEM ALL AND THEY HELPED GET HIM AND KEEP HIM IN OFFICE. YOU KNOW THAT IS THE WAY AMERICA WORKS. YOU SCRATCH MY BACK I SCRATCH YOURS. THE AMERICAN PEOPLE DID NOT BUY INTO IT. BUT WASHINGTON REPULICANS AND DEMOCRATS DID IT ANYWAY. THEY GAVE BUSH WHAT HE WANTED. THEY DID NOT LISTEN TO MAIN STREET ONLY TO BUSH. Most of them in Washington are already rich and looking out for their investments.
Posted by: lowes4321 | Jan 6, 2009 9:06:53 AM
One of the poorest journalistic train-wrecks of the new year was provided by Chris Cuomo this morning in his idiotic interview (1/6/09) of Barney Frank.
Cuomo refused to listen to Sen. Frank and regurgitated the same questions; then tried to unsuccessfully "couch" the answers to seemingly "indict" Frank and the Democratic Congress for this mess. Frank repeatedly told him the other half ($350bn)of the financial bailout was not admnistered by Paulson as agreed and as such, the remaining $350bn was "frozen" until the new administration took office where he felt the funds would be administered with the ACTUAL intent (to help taxpayers in foreclosure)in which they were appropriated. Cuomo was rude, and constantly interrupted Frank, seeemingly because he wasn't getting the answer that he wanted Frank to give. He actually wanted to blame the Democrats for the Republican economic blow-up.
The GOP hacks are now admitting that the bailout hasn't worked, yet, not a there is not a word of disdain for Paulson's administration of the bailout money, just fools trying to point fingers at the Democrats with them that voted to keep the entire U.S. financial system from flushing. Even John McCain interrupted his campaign to fly to Washington when the crisis loomed. Any word from the present White House? Oh yes, their "cat died". The cat is the lucky one, he doesn't have to suffer through this economy. He also doesn't have to watch Chris Cuomo's clumsy journalism skills.
Fire Paulson TODAY, and yank every dime from any financial instution that does not demonstrate a verifiable and successful Foreclosure/Loss Mitigation operation that is up and running 10 days after receipt of the bailout funds.
Posted by: houstontosandiego | Jan 6, 2009 9:28:44 AM
I don't think I fully understand all of the Republican bashing on this issue. The Democrats are bailout happy too aren't they?
Posted by: LongT | Jan 6, 2009 9:35:55 AM
To all those basing the GOP:
Atleast these guys are saying what we all were condemning from day one.
Where is the Democratic leadership's opinion? Still waiting for it to be politically correct to condemn? Democratic Congressional "leaders" are afraid to tell the American people what we already know. These bailouts are a bust. They seem to be afraid of leading, or fear that they might offend their constituents.
Posted by: i just love him soooo much | Jan 6, 2009 10:03:52 AM
We're going to listen to somebody who calls Bush a "fabulous" president????!!!!!
Posted by: Bob Brown | Jan 6, 2009 10:06:42 AM
We're going to listen to somebody who calls Bush a "fabulous" president????!!!!!
Posted by: Bob Brown | Jan 6, 2009 10:08:38 AM
Isn't this just like the GOP. ANY historian will tell you the same. After EVERY GOP presidential term the nation is handed, in rags, over to the left and then they (the GOP) do what they are best at, historical revisionism. They blame the mess on the left. I knew it was going to happen, but so soon?!
Posted by: RW | Jan 6, 2009 10:10:10 AM
Maybe there's hope for a small govt. fiscally conservative party in the future BUT I notice that not one of the so-called "bigs" here holds or has ever held national office. It appears that membership in Congress or the national executive converts conservatives instantly to supply-side borrow and spend big governement religious bigots. Time for a new party. The Republicans are the 21st century's Whigs. We need a party that wants government out of our pockets and social engineering based on Christian nation mythology. Will we get one? I doubt it.
Posted by: dem-dog | Jan 6, 2009 10:26:40 AM
This bailout of the Financial industry has failed us because the Secretary of Treasury and the Federal Reserve failed to watch over the funds that were given out to these financial wizards of Wall Street. No oversight,no rules, no guidelines and no regulation were applied by them or the President to ensure the funds they received were protected from fraud or theft by the wizards of Wall Street. Do you really think that you could have gotten any money from these financial establishments without a payment plan and a reason for borrowing this money from them. The rich keep getting rich and the middle class and the poor takes the beating. I agree that the CEOs should face criminal charges for fraud or embezzlement of funds and any other charges that are concern with corruption and conpiracy
Posted by: Thomas Wilson | Jan 6, 2009 10:26:53 AM
It's the time for Republicans to stand up for the government fiscal responsibilities. All that bailout and big government wasting our tax payers money without much restrictions have to be stopped on behalf of American people. Demos and Obama administration will go down to the history as the biggest spender of our tax payer money with mounting the biggest national debt and deficits, in the name of stimulus plan, even worse than Bush. The worst of all is, when all this is over, each of us has to pay the price.
Posted by: cellisis | Jan 6, 2009 10:30:13 AM
Post a comment
POLITICAL VIDEOS
THE NOTE BLOG ROLL
- ABC News -- George Stephanopoulos
- ABC News -- Jake Tapper
- ABC News Politics
- ABC News -- The Numbers
- ABC News -- The Blotter
- The American Prospect -- TAPPED
- The Atlantic -- Politics Channel
- The Boston Globe -- Political Intelligence
- Center for American Progress -- Think Progress
- Center for Responsive Politics
- The Chicago Sun-Times -- Lynn Sweet
- The Chicago Tribune -- The Swamp
- Drudge Report
- FactCheck.org
- FiveThirtyEight
- Heritage Foundation -- The Foundry
- The Hill -- Briefing Room
- The Hotline
- The Huffington Post
- The Los Angeles Times -- Top of the Ticket
- NPR -- Political Junkie
- National Review -- The Corner
- The New Republic -- The Plank
- The New York Times -- The Caucus
- Newsweek -- The Gaggle
- Political Wire -- Taegan Goddard
- Politico -- Ben Smith
- Politico -- Mike Allen’s Playbook
- PolitiFact
- Real Clear Politics
- Talking Points Memo
- Time -- The Page
- USA Today -- On Politics
- Variety -- Wilshire & Washington
- The Wall Street Journal -- Capital Journal
- The Washington Post -- The Fix
- The Washington Post -- 44

