Rick Klein is ABC News' Senior Political Reporter and author of The Note's morning look at the upcoming day in politics. Throughout the day, ABC News' political team contributes to The Note with the very latest news and analysis from the nation's capital.
To email Rick Klein, click here.
RECENT POSTS
- Price Tags: Costs Rise for Obama on Afghanistan
- The Note's Must-Reads for Wednesday, November 25, 2009
- ‘Top Line’ with Sally Quinn -- Inside the First Obama State Dinner
- GOPers to Biden: Stop Using Stimulus Jobs Numbers
- Exit Ramps: Democrats Grow Restless on Afghanistan Strategy
- The Note's Must-Reads for Tuesday, November 24, 2009
- RNC's Communications Chief Resigns
- A Better Palin Than Tina Fey?
- ‘Top Line’ -- ‘America’s Next Great Pundit’
- ‘Top Line’ at the Movies: ‘Outside the Law: Stories from Guantanamo’
THE NOTE CATEGORIES
- 2010
- Afghanistan
- Bill Clinton
- CIA
- Congress
- Democratic party
- Environment
- Financial Reform
- GOP
- Gov. Mark Sanford
- Gov. Sarah Palin
- Guantanamo
- Health Care
- Hillary Clinton
- Immigration
- Iran
- Iraq
- John McCain
- Mitt Romney
- North Korea
- Obama Agenda
- Politics Live
- President Obama
- Republican Party
- Ronald Reagan
- Sen. John Ensign
- Senate
- Sonia Sotomayor
- Stimulus
- Sunday Shows
- Supreme Court
- Ted Kennedy
- The Note
- The Note Must-Reads
- Top Line
- Vice President Biden
- Virginia
MONTHLY ARCHIVES
« Previous | Main | Next »
(GOP) Change That's Hard to Believe
January 08, 2009 4:07 PM
ABC News' Jonathan Karl reports: Here's some change you might find hard to believe in.
Republican congressional leaders Sen. Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., and Rep. John Boehner, R-Ohio, say they like what they are hearing so far on Obama's economic plans.
"I think we are being listened to," McConnell told reporters. "I'm pleased with what the new president's had to say so far. I don't have any complaints about the communication at this stage."
McConnell said that Republicans have consulted with economists "who would be considered more conservative," and, "Each of them agreed with the president, the incoming president, that we need to do a stimulus."
"It's clear to me from listening to the president, the new president," McConnell added, "that he wants to include Republican ideas and among them, that I've laid out in the last few days, are reducing the middle-class tax rate."
Of course, at this point it's good politics to sound bi-partisan with a popular incoming president.
The Republican leaders, however, did repeatedly express concern about the potential for too much spending.
"Obviously, the issue is how big and what form," McConnell said. "Given the deficit numbers, it really ought not to be a $1 trillion spending bill." And, he said, it needs to be temporary and targeted.
Boehner sounded a bi-partisan note as well, but repeatedly raised concerns about too much deficit spending.
"It's going to be our kids and their kids" who pay the debt, he said. "And we can't bury them under the debt, and we can't buy prosperity with more and more government spending."
Later on the Senate floor, Sen. Judd Gregg, R-N.H., the top Republican on the Budget Committee, also warned about deficit spending, saying the country is facing "a fiscal tsunami."
"It is obvious that we need a robust stimulus package right now and it is very obvious that we need to have it sooner rather than later," Gregg said. "And from my standpoint as a member of the Republican Party, which is in opposition here arguably, I want to work with the other side of the aisle and with the president-elect to accomplish it, because I don't think we can afford partisan politics at this time. We need to govern."
January 8, 2009 | Permalink | Share | User Comments (3)
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
Finally A Bi-Partisan Economic Recovery Bill! Hopefully They Do Not Put Pork Into The Bill.
Visit WWW.POLITICALINSIDER.NET
Posted by: zachary baum | Jan 8, 2009 4:28:24 PM
Funny, I don't remember Republican concern about too much deficit spending with the Paulson package, which discouraged any kind of oversight and has yet to account for where most of the 250 billion went.
Posted by: kat | Jan 8, 2009 4:52:11 PM
What in the world do you mean, Kat? It was Republicans in the House who voted overwhelmingly against the Paulson bailout, and a majority of GOP members in both houses of Congress voted against it the second time. It was the Democrats who voted overwhelmingly in favor of the bailout. Check the vote numbers.
But, then again, when your only source of news is the mainstream (read: leftist) media, those things get lost on you.
Posted by: Steve | Jan 8, 2009 7:18:26 PM
Post a comment
POLITICAL VIDEOS
THE NOTE BLOG ROLL
- ABC News -- George Stephanopoulos
- ABC News -- Jake Tapper
- ABC News Politics
- ABC News -- The Numbers
- ABC News -- The Blotter
- The American Prospect -- TAPPED
- The Atlantic -- Politics Channel
- The Boston Globe -- Political Intelligence
- Center for American Progress -- Think Progress
- Center for Responsive Politics
- The Chicago Sun-Times -- Lynn Sweet
- The Chicago Tribune -- The Swamp
- Drudge Report
- FactCheck.org
- FiveThirtyEight
- Heritage Foundation -- The Foundry
- The Hill -- Briefing Room
- The Hotline
- The Huffington Post
- The Los Angeles Times -- Top of the Ticket
- NPR -- Political Junkie
- National Review -- The Corner
- The New Republic -- The Plank
- The New York Times -- The Caucus
- Newsweek -- The Gaggle
- Political Wire -- Taegan Goddard
- Politico -- Ben Smith
- Politico -- Mike Allen’s Playbook
- PolitiFact
- Real Clear Politics
- Talking Points Memo
- Time -- The Page
- USA Today -- On Politics
- Variety -- Wilshire & Washington
- The Wall Street Journal -- Capital Journal
- The Washington Post -- The Fix
- The Washington Post -- 44

