Rick Klein is ABC News' Senior Political Reporter and author of The Note's morning look at the upcoming day in politics. Throughout the day, ABC News' political team contributes to The Note with the very latest news and analysis from the nation's capital.
To email Rick Klein, click here.
RECENT POSTS
- A Better Palin Than Tina Fey?
- ‘Top Line’ -- ‘America’s Next Great Pundit’
- ‘Top Line’ at the Movies: ‘Outside the Law: Stories from Guantanamo’
- Mass. GOP Gov’s Candidate Chooses Openly Gay Running Mate
- Workplace Diversity: Lines in Sand Make Mess for Dems
- The Note's Must-Reads for Monday, November 23, 2009
- AARP Endorses Cloture Vote, Not Yet Reid's Bill
- McCain Targets Ben Nelson on Health Care Vote
- 'Top Line' -- Ambassador Oprah? Senator Oprah?
- Sen. Brown: Health Care Bill Needs More Subsidies
THE NOTE CATEGORIES
- 2010
- Afghanistan
- Bill Clinton
- CIA
- Congress
- Democratic party
- Environment
- Financial Reform
- GOP
- Gov. Mark Sanford
- Gov. Sarah Palin
- Guantanamo
- Health Care
- Hillary Clinton
- Immigration
- Iran
- Iraq
- John McCain
- Mitt Romney
- North Korea
- Obama Agenda
- Politics Live
- President Obama
- Republican Party
- Ronald Reagan
- Sen. John Ensign
- Senate
- Sonia Sotomayor
- Stimulus
- Sunday Shows
- Supreme Court
- Ted Kennedy
- The Note
- The Note Must-Reads
- Top Line
- Vice President Biden
- Virginia
MONTHLY ARCHIVES
« Previous | Main | Next »
GOP Pushback Mounts on Gitmo
January 22, 2009 11:02 AM
ABC News’ Rick Klein reports: President Obama is facing growing criticism from Republicans over his order to close the U.S. detention center in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, with his decision to fulfill a well-known campaign pledge bringing an early test of his promised bipartisan cooperation.
A group of House Republicans quickly filed a bill that would prohibit federal courts from ordering the transfer or release of Guantanamo detainees into the U.S.
“Closing Guantanamo Bay presents a clear and present danger to all Americans," said Rep. Lamar Smith, R-Texas, the top Republican on the House Judiciary Committee.
Republicans on Capitol Hill are voicing concerns about what happens to the suspected terrorists who are now being detained there.
They cite a recent Pentagon estimate finding that some 61 detainees released from Gitmo have rejoined the fight against the United States and its allies.
House Majority Leader John Boehner, R-Ohio, who was briefed in advance on Obama’s first round of executive orders, is expressing significant concern about the decision regarding Gitmo.
“I think the first thing we have to remember is that we're talking about terrorists here,” Boehner said Thursday. “Do we bring them into our borders? Do we release them back into the battlefield, like some 61 detainees that have been released we know are back on the battlefield? And do we release them to get back and rejoin this fight?”
He added, “The big concern is, how do you come up with a policy to say, ‘We're going to close Guantanamo,’ without having a policy in place for what you're going to do with those that are there?”
Said House Minority Whip Eric Cantor, R-Va.: “Actively moving terrorists inside our borders weakens our security, raises far more questions than it answers and is the wrong track for our nation. Most families neither want nor need hundreds of terrorists seeking to kill Americans in their communities. We need to have a serious, careful, and realistic national discussion about the ramifications of closing Guantanamo Bay.”
The top Republican on the House Intelligence committee, Rep. Peter Hoekstra, called the move “premature.”
“This is an executive order that places hope ahead of reality -- it sets an objective without a plan to get there,” said Hoekstra, R-Mich. “Given the fact that we are talking about trained terrorists and people who have committed acts of mass murder, it would seem the proper course would be to have a plan in place before making this decision.”
Meanwhile, at least one group is criticizing Obama for not acting more swiftly.
“It only took days to put these men in Guantanamo, it shouldn’t take a year to get them out,” said Vincent Warren, executive director of the Center for Constitutional Rights, which represents some of the detainees at Gitmo.
“We are proud that President Obama made addressing Guantanamo one of his first acts in office. Yet we are disappointed that he outlined no concrete steps for closing the base and gave his administration an entire year to sort out its plans -- meaning that some men could have been detained indefinitely in terrible conditions for eight full years. Surely he could do better,” Warren said.
And here’s guessing not too many other members of Congress will make the offer that Rep. Jack Murtha, D-Pa., did Wednesday.
“Sure, I'd take 'em,” Murtha told Fox News. “They're no more dangerous in my district than in Guantanamo.”
January 22, 2009 | Permalink | Share | User Comments (764)
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
This makes me concerned about what President Obama's reaction will be if there's a major terrorist attack on us while he's in office...and sadly, I think the word "if" is overly optimistic.
Posted by: Dave | Jan 22, 2009 11:16:25 AM
Give the terrorists to Murtha.
Posted by: walter | Jan 22, 2009 11:29:51 AM
I hope they put the Gitmo terrorist in NY,NY or Washington DC. Those people deserve the company.
Posted by: Sluggo | Jan 22, 2009 11:32:57 AM
Good to see that at least a few of our federal employees are still interested in protecting the country against the terrorists who want us all dead.
Posted by: Ron | Jan 22, 2009 11:38:31 AM
I am sure Bush would have closed the base within a year also, problem is he still has to DEAL with the detainees and it gives him a year to figure that out.
This is just part of his dog and pony show and shows he is learning things are a little more complicated in the real world.
Posted by: HH | Jan 22, 2009 11:39:00 AM
So the Republicans don't want to be prosecuted for their support of Bush's illegal and inhumane torture? What else is new. These so called "compassionate conservatives" have been so criminally invoved for the past 8 years and won't even man up to their transgressions against mankind. What slimes GOPs can be. I hope they're out of office for many, many years to come.
Posted by: buzziea | Jan 22, 2009 11:40:20 AM
NBC calls white americans, rednecks and bigots.
Posted by: RGeier | Jan 22, 2009 11:45:15 AM
nbc calls rednecks and bigots,rednecks and bigots...
Posted by: clay | Jan 22, 2009 11:57:46 AM
Seriously, does moving these guys inside our borders REALLY damage our security?
You know, that sounds an awful lot like scare tactics to me. The same sort of old fashioned politics the GOP has used forever. Exactly the same kind of "the sky is falling" rhetoric that voters soundly rejected in November.
If closing that blight, the Gitmo Prison, and moving those prisoners onto US soil is really going to be such a security problem then I want the money back. I want the money back I and other taxpayers have paid for the Department of Homeland Security. I want the money back that we have spent building new prisons so we can incarcerate more people than any other nation. I want the money back we have spent beefing up border security and building a police state to "protect" us.
And while you are at it, I want liberty, freedom and AMERICA back, too.
--Give Me Liberty Or I'll Get Up And Take It Myself--
Posted by: Saint Genesius | Jan 22, 2009 12:01:22 PM
Remember the prisoners at Gitmo are not terrorist, they are only SUSPECTS. Many are probably dangerous but a large number are innocent. They need military tribunals to strike a balance between liberty and security.
"Those who would sacrifice liberty for safety deserve neither."
Posted by: Paul | Jan 22, 2009 12:02:11 PM
What else can the GOP do? They are out of power and without a following. They lead nothing, and convince no one. The public wants this thing closed. The public wants the Rule of Law. The public wants Obama to succeed. The GOP?
Posted by: Thinking | Jan 22, 2009 12:15:16 PM
We could send them all to Texas. Afterall, Bush lives there and he created the problem. Besides, Texas likes executing prisoners.
Posted by: Sammy | Jan 22, 2009 12:19:59 PM
The question is where do you put them. No senator is going to allow them to be put in "their" state. So what do we do? I am not "pro" Gitmo, Just wonder how this will come out.
Posted by: a reader in ga | Jan 22, 2009 12:22:47 PM
Regardless of the statistics of what former detainees have done in the past, do we have the legal standing to hold anyone we think might be a terrorist PERMANENTLY with no hope of trial or release? Are we that desperate as a nation? Are we that sure of ourselves? Has anyone in the GOP addressed the cost of keeping Gitmo open? I'm not talking maybes, I'm talking cold hard cash. Don't tell me the cost of closing it is "our security as a nation" that's hogwash. Take the money we're spending at Gitmo and shore up the military. Bring the military home and have them in ready-mode to strike at a known threat when it's a known threat. That's what the Israeli armed forces do.
Posted by: CaffeineHat | Jan 22, 2009 12:27:22 PM
Gitmo has always made me uncomfortable - it's just an easy way for the US government to avoid giving these terrorists rights to a fair and speedy trial and an easy way to allow torture. But at the same time, bringing these terrorists to the US makes me even more uncomfortable - once on US soil - they are afforded constitutional rights. I live in an area with lots of maximum security prisons and sure hope these guys aren't transfered here. Careful as prisons are, escapes happen. These are guys who planned 9-11, I'm sure pulling off a prison escape would be a piece of cake for them.
Posted by: Lil Mel | Jan 22, 2009 12:27:53 PM
What a slap in the face to our soldiers, to imply they cannot manage a prison on a military base. The Republicans blow it again with their stupid innuendo. Insult our troops and infer terrorists will be put in halfway houses next to playgrounds. Showing their true clown colors.
Posted by: andielee | Jan 22, 2009 12:30:46 PM
We should not question Obama's judgment. Moves like this one - closing Guantanamo Bay - is the reason why we the majority, elected him. Freedom and justice is a wonderful thing!
Posted by: Happy voter | Jan 22, 2009 12:32:52 PM
The protections that have served us well under the Bush administration should be continued. Obama would rather appease his liberal supporters than to protect America.
If Obama removes these protections and we are attacked again he should never be forgiven.
Posted by: James | Jan 22, 2009 12:34:45 PM
Acually, Thinking, you are not correct according to a poll conducted by CBS more than 48% of the publics wants Gitmo to stay open with only 40% agreeing with Obama to close it. Let's see how the public responds now that Obama has made this decision to close it.
Posted by: SB | Jan 22, 2009 12:35:00 PM
I kind of like the idea of bringing them to US prisons. I predict that our problem will be solved by American inmates. Terrorists may prefer Gitmo justice over what they'll encounter here.
Posted by: Dave P | Jan 22, 2009 12:35:08 PM
Post a comment
POLITICAL VIDEOS
THE NOTE BLOG ROLL
- ABC News -- George Stephanopoulos
- ABC News -- Jake Tapper
- ABC News Politics
- ABC News -- The Numbers
- ABC News -- The Blotter
- The American Prospect -- TAPPED
- The Atlantic -- Politics Channel
- The Boston Globe -- Political Intelligence
- Center for American Progress -- Think Progress
- Center for Responsive Politics
- The Chicago Sun-Times -- Lynn Sweet
- The Chicago Tribune -- The Swamp
- Drudge Report
- FactCheck.org
- FiveThirtyEight
- Heritage Foundation -- The Foundry
- The Hill -- Briefing Room
- The Hotline
- The Huffington Post
- The Los Angeles Times -- Top of the Ticket
- NPR -- Political Junkie
- National Review -- The Corner
- The New Republic -- The Plank
- The New York Times -- The Caucus
- Newsweek -- The Gaggle
- Political Wire -- Taegan Goddard
- Politico -- Ben Smith
- Politico -- Mike Allen’s Playbook
- PolitiFact
- Real Clear Politics
- Talking Points Memo
- Time -- The Page
- USA Today -- On Politics
- Variety -- Wilshire & Washington
- The Wall Street Journal -- Capital Journal
- The Washington Post -- The Fix
- The Washington Post -- 44

