The Note
Washington's Original and Most Influential Tipsheet
Rick Klein is ABC News' Senior Political Reporter and author of The Note's morning look at the upcoming day in politics. Throughout the day, ABC News' political team contributes to The Note with the very latest news and analysis from the nation's capital.
To email Rick Klein, click here.
RECENT POSTS
- ‘Top Line’: ‘Mini-Revolt’ in Congress on Health Care
- LIVESTREAMING THE SOTOMAYOR HEARINGS
- Republicans Stepping up Anti-Stimulus Rhetoric
- The Note: Verdicts & Visits -- Agenda delayed, Obama seeks to grab back narrative
- The Note's Must-Reads for Friday, July 10, 2009
- Embattled AIG Hoping to Avoid Backlash When Paying Out More Bonuses
- Newest Senator Meets High Court Nominee
- 'Top Line' -- Wheels Coming Off Obama Agenda?
- CIA Spat: Pelosi Vindicated? Not Quite
- The Note: Buckeye Brawl -- Ohio Hosts Latest Round in Stimulus Fight
THE NOTE CATEGORIES
- 2010
- Afghanistan
- Bill Clinton
- Congress
- Democratic party
- Environment
- Financial Reform
- GOP
- Gov. Mark Sanford
- Gov. Sarah Palin
- Guantanamo
- Health Care
- Iran
- Iraq
- John McCain
- Mitt Romney
- North Korea
- Obama Agenda
- Politics Live
- President Obama
- Republican Party
- Ronald Reagan
- Sen. John Ensign
- Senate
- Sonia Sotomayor
- Stimulus
- Supreme Court
- The Note
- The Note Must-Reads
- Top Line
- Vice President Biden
- Virginia
MONTHLY ARCHIVES
« Previous | Main | Next »
New Ad Pushes Obama on Health Care
January 08, 2009 12:01 PM
ABC News' Tahman Bradley Reports: A coalition of six groups launched a health care ad on Thursday urging President-elect Obama and Congress not to forget about fixing the nation's struggling health care system in the early days of the new administration.
With the 111th Congress set to move quickly on an economic recovery package, the diverse group of organizations used the ad to connect fixing health care to rescuing the economy. The six organizations -- representing doctors, labor, as well as the pharmaceutical industry and a major insurance provider -- argue that an economic recovery requires systemic reforms that reduce health care costs.
"At a time when American businesses are hurting why should we worry about fixing health care? Because quality and affordable health care can save money and make businesses more competitive so they can invest in innovation, hire back workers, create jobs, get the economy working again…for everyone," a narrator says in the 30-second spot.
The groups will not disclose the exact size of the buy but claim that it is a "multi-million dollar ad buy" on national cable as well as broadcast television in Washington, DC for at least a month.
Support for reform could fall apart if President-elect Obama sticks to his plan of opposing an individual mandate while imposing a new requirement on insurers that they accept patients without regard to pre-existing condition. Blue Cross Blue Shield Association made clear to ABC News that it expects to go along with Obama's guaranteed issue proposal if it includes an individual mandate.
"We're very pleased that Congress and the administration are making health care affordable to everyone. We are supporting an individual mandate and we think that's important," said Blue Cross Blue Shield Senior Vice President Alissa Fox. "You want to make insurance affordable for everyone and the only way to do that is to make sure everyone is in the pool."
Another possible stumbling block is Obama's call for creating a government insurance option which would compete for patients against private insurers. The insurance industry has warned that this proposal amounts to a backdoor effort to impose price controls by eliminating private insurance and having everyone covered by the government. Liberal advocates of public insurance, by contrast, have argued that a government insurance option is non-negotiable.
Fox said Blue Cross Blue Shield doesn't see the need for a public government option. "If you're setting strict standards for insurers and we're taking everybody regardless of their health status, why would we need a public health program?"
The insurance industry's hard line on an individual mandate illustrates the difficult political work that needs to be done to build a broad coalition for reform. But, for now the coalition behind the TV spot hopes everyone stays onboard when the President-elect brings forth his proposal.
"The groups involved haven't always seen eye to eye on health care reform," said Steve Weiss, spokesman for the American Cancer Society Network.
"But the message we're sending is that different stakeholders believe that health care reform must be a top priority for the new president and Congress, and that a variety of different stakeholders need to be at the table to craft the health care reform plan that improves the health of the country."
In addition to the television commercial, the six groups have committed to doing grassroots activities across the country.
"We hope the ad campaign and the subsequent grassroots activities we will engage in nationwide will send a message that groups with different views of the health care system share in a belief that health care reform is an important issue," said Weiss.
The ad’s release is timed to the start of former Sen. Tom Daschle’s Senate confirmation hearings for Secretary of Health and Human Services.
The six groups backing the ad are the American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network, American Medical Association, Families USA, the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, Regence BlueCross BlueShield and the Service Employees International.
AD SCRIPT
At a time when American businesses are hurting why should we worry about fixing health care?
Because quality and affordable health care can save money and make businesses more competitive so they can invest in innovation, hire back workers, create jobs, get the economy working again…for everyone.
Quality, affordable health care, it’s not just something we should do for America’s families, it’s something we must do for America’s economy.
January 8, 2009 | Permalink | Share | User Comments (9)
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
As long as people consume garbage, they will continue to be sick in large numbers. Really no point in fixing healthcare when the food supply is as bad as it is.
Posted by: Huh | Jan 8, 2009 10:18:11 AM
I was told not to long ago that Boston actually has Universal Health care. They only state in the United that does it. I was also told by the person who lives in Boston that it has been working great. Why do we not hear any stories about Boston Mass, and Universal Health care???
Posted by: becky (the real one) | Jan 8, 2009 10:24:58 AM
becky (the real one) - for information an understanding of the Mass. Healthcare plan, "go to" Wikipedia; Massachusetts health care reform.
Posted by: bobj72 | Jan 8, 2009 10:45:22 AM
"I was told not to long ago that Boston actually has Universal Health care. They only state in the United that does it. I was also told by the person who lives in Boston that it has been working great. Why do we not hear any stories about Boston Mass, and Universal Health care???
-----------------------------------
becky (the real one) ,
First off, Boston is a city, not a state.
They do not have Universal Healthcare, they require everyone to have insurance. If you cant get your own, the state offers a plan. My understanding is that like most things run by the government, it is wasteful. How it stacks up to other policies, no one really has enough data to know yet
Posted by: Mike_C | Jan 8, 2009 11:26:01 AM
So, they don't want to actually reduce health care costs, they want the government to pay the premiums for those people who can't afford insurance. Then, they can have more income ... and the doctors, hospitals and insurance companies will milk it for all they can. More waste. They need to get at the root of the problem and prevent doctors from charging hundreds of dollars for a few minutes of their time.
Posted by: MadeInUSA | Jan 8, 2009 5:01:04 PM
Single-Payer is the only way to go. It wouldn't change the delivery system at all. You would still retain the doctor of your choice and actually could go to any doctor you wanted in the future; there wouldn't be any artificial "network" requirements.
Single-Payer would ONLY change how your health care is paid for AND it would guarantee that every citizen, without exception, can get health care, without profit-obsessed insurance companies getting in the way of the relationship between you and your doctor.
The government would have no role in delivering health care. They would only make sure that we all pay the same regardless and that no one is turned away.
Posted by: snesich | Jan 8, 2009 8:08:13 PM
The reason Dr.'s charge what they charge is to try to recoupe losses for all the times they don't get paid. In addition, if you look at your itemized statement from the hospital, you'll find that what the Dr. charges pales in comparison to what the hospital charges and the costs of drugs and supplies.
Posted by: Dr.Jay | Jan 8, 2009 8:22:45 PM
Hawaii offered state health care to those w/out private insurance or not covered under other gov't plans. Guess what? It lasted only months. Why?
Because those with private insurance dropped their policies and went with the gov't plan, for free. Why keep paying for insurance when you can get it from the gov't for free?
This overwhelmed the system and after 7 short months Hawaii had to drop their state insurance.
Something for the Fed Gov't to consider before they rush into a similar plan.
Posted by: Interested08 | Jan 9, 2009 12:23:21 AM
Here is the real problem. Obama nor Daschle dont get it. Its spelled out here in detail. Go read it. Its a condensed version of an SEC filing. Public info. The politicians just need to read this.
http://www.universalhealthcareinfousa.com/insurancecompanies.html
Posted by: John Saarikko | Jan 9, 2009 8:43:50 PM
Post a comment
POLITICAL VIDEOS
THE NOTE BLOG ROLL
- ABC News -- George Stephanopoulos
- ABC News -- Jake Tapper
- ABC News Politics
- ABC News -- The Blotter
- The American Prospect -- TAPPED
- The Atlantic -- Politics Channel
- The Boston Globe -- Political Intelligence
- Center for American Progress -- Think Progress
- Center for Responsive Politics
- The Chicago Sun-Times -- Lynn Sweet
- The Chicago Tribune -- The Swamp
- Drudge Report
- FactCheck.org
- FiveThirtyEight
- Heritage Foundation -- The Foundry
- The Hill -- Briefing Room
- The Hotline
- The Huffington Post
- The Los Angeles Times -- Top of the Ticket
- NPR -- Political Junkie
- National Review -- The Corner
- The New Republic -- The Plank
- The New York Times -- The Caucus
- Political Wire -- Taegan Goddard
- Politicker
- Politico -- Ben Smith
- Politico -- Mike Allen’s Playbook
- PolitiFact
- Real Clear Politics
- Talking Points Memo
- Time -- The Page
- USA Today -- On Politics
- Variety -- Wilshire & Washington
- The Wall Street Journal -- Capital Journal
- The Washington Post -- The Fix
- The Washington Post -- 44
