Rick Klein is ABC News' Senior Political Reporter and author of The Note's morning look at the upcoming day in politics. Throughout the day, ABC News' political team contributes to The Note with the very latest news and analysis from the nation's capital.
To email Rick Klein, click here.
RECENT POSTS
- RNC's Communications Chief Resigns
- A Better Palin Than Tina Fey?
- ‘Top Line’ -- ‘America’s Next Great Pundit’
- ‘Top Line’ at the Movies: ‘Outside the Law: Stories from Guantanamo’
- Mass. GOP Gov’s Candidate Chooses Openly Gay Running Mate
- Workplace Diversity: Lines in Sand Make Mess for Dems
- The Note's Must-Reads for Monday, November 23, 2009
- AARP Endorses Cloture Vote, Not Yet Reid's Bill
- McCain Targets Ben Nelson on Health Care Vote
- 'Top Line' -- Ambassador Oprah? Senator Oprah?
THE NOTE CATEGORIES
- 2010
- Afghanistan
- Bill Clinton
- CIA
- Congress
- Democratic party
- Environment
- Financial Reform
- GOP
- Gov. Mark Sanford
- Gov. Sarah Palin
- Guantanamo
- Health Care
- Hillary Clinton
- Immigration
- Iran
- Iraq
- John McCain
- Mitt Romney
- North Korea
- Obama Agenda
- Politics Live
- President Obama
- Republican Party
- Ronald Reagan
- Sen. John Ensign
- Senate
- Sonia Sotomayor
- Stimulus
- Sunday Shows
- Supreme Court
- Ted Kennedy
- The Note
- The Note Must-Reads
- Top Line
- Vice President Biden
- Virginia
MONTHLY ARCHIVES
« Previous | Main | Next »
The Note, 1/21/09: Day Two -- President Obama (At Last) Seeks Running Start
January 21, 2009 7:58 AM
By RICK KLEIN
Will we remember the dancing if there isn’t an encore?
Beyonce and 2 million of her friends are headed home. We start caring less about what Michelle Obama is wearing and more about what Kent Conrad is thinking. Chief Justice John Roberts has plenty of time to memorize the oath for the next time around.
President Obama’s inauguration was geared toward a reinvigoration of the movement he now leads. With its clear breaks from the Bush era, his speech offered sharp points upon which he and his supporters hope to pivot -- with expectations that match the challenges of these times.
Through his election and the history-soaked excitement surrounding his inauguration, he purchased some additional political capital -- or at least some additional time to spend it. (Though, given the market performance on Inauguration Day, maybe everyone has a bit less to spend.)
Spend he must -- and quickly. The new era of responsibility starts now, and it starts inside the White House:
The key to the Obama strategy now: Putting points on the board early.
Acting immediately: “Starting tomorrow we’ll be making a series of announcements both on domestic and foreign policy that I think will be critical for us to act swiftly on, we’re not going to be able to delay,” the president told ABC’s Robin Roberts at Tuesday night’s Neighborhood Ball.
January 21, 2009 in The Note | Permalink | Share | User Comments (256)
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
Well now that it's all rainbows and sunshine here in the good ole USA, I am going to march on up to DC and get in line for a handout...umm I mean bailout!!! Hell, with $700B already appropriated there has to be some money left for the average Joe's right??!!! All together now, let's click our heels 3 times and let the "change" magic begin LOL!!!
Posted by: grumpyoldmanintown | Jan 21, 2009 8:31:39 AM
Well, he needs to.
The market tanked yesterday. What does that tell you? The economy doesn't trust him as far as your dead grandmother could throw him.
The beginning of the "change" we were promised and the market tanked. It will be a long 4 years.
Posted by: Buyer's Remorse | Jan 21, 2009 8:50:37 AM
Wow,
The only thing that could outdue the WORST sell off of the DOW in post election history after BO won, was the WORST inauguration day sell-ff of the DOW in history.
I wonder how many of the liberal whackjob media outlets will broadcast those facts?
Posted by: dave | Jan 21, 2009 9:05:31 AM
Nothing like a healthy dose of cynicism to start off a Wednesday morning, huh grumpyoldmanintown?
Obama's ability to do what he wants to do will very likely impact you, so you might actually consider sucking up that cynical pride and try rooting for the man who's going to be running the country, and having a significant impact on the world as a whole.
Just a thought...
Posted by: par_for_the_course | Jan 21, 2009 9:06:59 AM
I saw a myriad of people on TV yesterday explaining how Obama was now going to pay their bills. If this is how he got elected, this is serious trouble. The level of ignorance was astounding.
Posted by: brian | Jan 21, 2009 9:08:17 AM
Can't wait to see how this plays out. He got where is he by blaming everyone else for one thing or another. Let's see who he blames when he figures out he doesn't have a clue how fix the economy.
Posted by: Greg | Jan 21, 2009 9:10:31 AM
I wonder if I forget to pay my self-employment tax, will the IRS let me slide with an "honest mistake?" Geithner should be out.
Posted by: NewCongress2010 | Jan 21, 2009 9:10:33 AM
"The market tanked yesterday. What does that tell you? The economy doesn't trust him as far as your dead grandmother could throw him."
Right, it doesn't have anything to do with the year plus-long tumble that has been happening. And this "market" is also responsible for where we are now. Not Obama.
Posted by: Silky | Jan 21, 2009 9:11:12 AM
Actions speak much louder than words. Let's see the "miracle"!!!!!
Posted by: jill | Jan 21, 2009 9:12:16 AM
"Obama's ability to do what he wants to do will very likely impact you, so you might actually consider sucking up that cynical pride and try rooting for the man who's going to be running the country, and having a significant impact on the world as a whole."
This is way too logical.
Posted by: Silky | Jan 21, 2009 9:12:28 AM
Regardless of what happens, the Obama's are now financially set for life. Wish the rest of us could say the same.
Posted by: MadeInUSA | Jan 21, 2009 9:16:12 AM
"Regardless of what happens, the Obama's are now financially set for life. Wish the rest of us could say the same."
They're no more financially set for life now than they were before he decided to run for President. Or even the Senate, for that matter.
Posted by: Silky | Jan 21, 2009 9:23:14 AM
You can tell the rightwingers have been saving up their self pitying, snarky complaints for the day after the inauguration. Babies! You haven't even begun to suffer and all ready you act like Obama has outed your CIA wife to punish you for telling the truth, or fired qualified Democratic Attorney Generals for not prosecuting Republicans before elections...oh, you don't know what it is to suffer, and probably won't because from all signs, Obama treats the opposition as if this were a Democracy.
Posted by: Amy | Jan 21, 2009 9:25:30 AM
Amy, I think you might be right. We have not even begun to suffer!
Maybe will see the narcissist compare himself to Lincoln a little bit more. Can't wait for Marshall Law and a suspension of states rights.
Posted by: Greg | Jan 21, 2009 9:28:53 AM
The economy is a lot worse than most people are aware of. The possible fallout greater than most expect. I care not who sits in the Whitehouse, Obama or should it have been McCain, the crisis is greater than one man -- even the presidency of U.S. It is a shame that Americans angered over Obama's win will sit on their backsides and complain, instead of putting their hand to the task in their own community to help in this economic downturn. The U.S. government was fiscally irresponsible, but so have most Americans. The hardships was created by the government and by the people -- it will take both to fix it. If everyone gets their financial house in order or at least starts forming a plan to get there -- hopefully this storm will not be as bad as it portends to be. Don't use who is in the Whitehouse as an excuse not to mind your own house's affairs. There is more than Obama being tested today.
Posted by: elaine | Jan 21, 2009 9:30:09 AM
"Maybe will see the narcissist compare himself to Lincoln a little bit more. Can't wait for Marshall Law and a suspension of states rights."
Wait...what? And what? Seriously, snap out of it. Come back down to earth please, if you're going to talk with the grown ups.
Posted by: Silky | Jan 21, 2009 9:30:44 AM
So the central government is about to take a more active role in the life of America. I don't want unicorns in my living room. Did fine without them so far.
Posted by: mmonroeliveson | Jan 21, 2009 9:35:39 AM
Silky
Get your head out of liberal butt please. I would guess that BO and his angry millionaire wife will be worth ATLEAST 300 million in 10-15 years. You see, that is what liberals in power do. They run around screaming at everyone to share! share! share! but somehow their bank accounts seem to just grow! grow! grow!
Here are some fun facts you would probably never hear from the nutty liberal media about the "spread the wealth around" crew....
-27/50 of the wealthiest members of congress are liberals.
-300 private jets landed in Washington for Bush's inauguration day, over 600 flew in for barry's (that is one heck of a "carbon footprint" from the global warming freaks)
- Joe Biden, the man who famously said "time to do your patriotic duty, time to pay higher taxes" has earned a healthy $2.59 million dollars in the last 10 years and has given less then 3k to charity in that same time (.001.%)Now, that is what I call patriotic joe!
-the average dontation to the republican party has historically been $50 dollars, and the average donation to the democrats is....... we don't really know because george soros doesn't what us to know.
Posted by: dave | Jan 21, 2009 9:39:04 AM
"So the central government is about to take a more active role in the life of America. I don't want unicorns in my living room. Did fine without them so far."
I honestly think you guys are sniffing glue or something. You're talking some other language having nothing to do with reality. The "central government" is going to create jobs rebuilding infrastructure in a manner that is going to pay dividends down the road. It's a great idea. Is that what you're refering to?
Posted by: Silky | Jan 21, 2009 9:39:28 AM
dave, what is your point? Democrats aren't allowed to make money? My point was that the Obamas are very bright lawyers...money was never going to be a concern for them as long as they worked. And you realize that if they're rich, they're subjected to the same taxes as everybody else, right? Regardless, Obama is talking about holding off on taxing the over $250K. And what do you care? Your fry cook job will never get you within $235K of having to worry about it anyway. Your taxes will DECREASE under his campaign plan. There you go again...voting against your own best interest.
Posted by: Silky | Jan 21, 2009 9:43:32 AM
Post a comment
POLITICAL VIDEOS
THE NOTE BLOG ROLL
- ABC News -- George Stephanopoulos
- ABC News -- Jake Tapper
- ABC News Politics
- ABC News -- The Numbers
- ABC News -- The Blotter
- The American Prospect -- TAPPED
- The Atlantic -- Politics Channel
- The Boston Globe -- Political Intelligence
- Center for American Progress -- Think Progress
- Center for Responsive Politics
- The Chicago Sun-Times -- Lynn Sweet
- The Chicago Tribune -- The Swamp
- Drudge Report
- FactCheck.org
- FiveThirtyEight
- Heritage Foundation -- The Foundry
- The Hill -- Briefing Room
- The Hotline
- The Huffington Post
- The Los Angeles Times -- Top of the Ticket
- NPR -- Political Junkie
- National Review -- The Corner
- The New Republic -- The Plank
- The New York Times -- The Caucus
- Newsweek -- The Gaggle
- Political Wire -- Taegan Goddard
- Politico -- Ben Smith
- Politico -- Mike Allen’s Playbook
- PolitiFact
- Real Clear Politics
- Talking Points Memo
- Time -- The Page
- USA Today -- On Politics
- Variety -- Wilshire & Washington
- The Wall Street Journal -- Capital Journal
- The Washington Post -- The Fix
- The Washington Post -- 44

