Rick Klein is ABC News' Senior Political Reporter and author of The Note's morning look at the upcoming day in politics. Throughout the day, ABC News' political team contributes to The Note with the very latest news and analysis from the nation's capital.
To email Rick Klein, click here.
RECENT POSTS
- RNC's Communications Chief Resigns
- A Better Palin Than Tina Fey?
- ‘Top Line’ -- ‘America’s Next Great Pundit’
- ‘Top Line’ at the Movies: ‘Outside the Law: Stories from Guantanamo’
- Mass. GOP Gov’s Candidate Chooses Openly Gay Running Mate
- Workplace Diversity: Lines in Sand Make Mess for Dems
- The Note's Must-Reads for Monday, November 23, 2009
- AARP Endorses Cloture Vote, Not Yet Reid's Bill
- McCain Targets Ben Nelson on Health Care Vote
- 'Top Line' -- Ambassador Oprah? Senator Oprah?
THE NOTE CATEGORIES
- 2010
- Afghanistan
- Bill Clinton
- CIA
- Congress
- Democratic party
- Environment
- Financial Reform
- GOP
- Gov. Mark Sanford
- Gov. Sarah Palin
- Guantanamo
- Health Care
- Hillary Clinton
- Immigration
- Iran
- Iraq
- John McCain
- Mitt Romney
- North Korea
- Obama Agenda
- Politics Live
- President Obama
- Republican Party
- Ronald Reagan
- Sen. John Ensign
- Senate
- Sonia Sotomayor
- Stimulus
- Sunday Shows
- Supreme Court
- Ted Kennedy
- The Note
- The Note Must-Reads
- Top Line
- Vice President Biden
- Virginia
MONTHLY ARCHIVES
« Previous | Main | Next »
The Krugman Democrats
February 11, 2009 12:22 AM
ABC News' Teddy Davis reports:
![]() |
| New York Times columnist Paul Krugman spoke at the "Thinking Big, Thinking Forward" conference in Washington, D.C., on Feb. 11, 2009. Ferdous Al-Faruque/ ABC News |
President Barack Obama's economic recovery package is still making its way through Congress. But a group of progressive activists and liberal academics are already worried that it won't go far enough.
"We're very aware of the [President Franklin] Roosevelt mistake of 1937," said Robert Borosage, president of the liberal Institute for America's Future. "The economy started to improve, he cut spending, and we did not get out of the Depression until the war started."
To push back against those in both parties who want to rein in government spending as soon as possible, Borosage's group has teamed up with Demos, the Economic Policy Institute, and the American Prospect magazine to organize a "Thinking Big, Thinking Forward" conference.
Wednesday's 800-person gathering, which is taking place at the Capital Hilton Hotel in Washington, D.C., is intended to make the case that "jobs-based growth" and a "broadly shared prosperity" will require far more than a short-term stimulus.
Think of this group as the Krugman Democrats, so named because its intellectual leader is New York Times columnist Paul Krugman, the Princeton professor who recently won a Nobel Prize for economics.
Krugman, who was recently named by Forbes Magazine as the most influential liberal in the U.S. media, will keynote the "Thinking Big" conference. Also on the agenda are Pennsylvania Gov. Ed Rendell (D), Rep. George Miller, D-Calif., and former Obama policy director Karen Kornbluh.
Asked how he would pay for the sustained public investments in health care, education, renewable energy, and infrastructure that he supports, Borosage said he would close tax loopholes, raise capital gains taxes, and allow President Bush's tax cuts for wealthy to expire while also cutting the Pentagon budget.
"Once the economy starts to recover, you've got to pay for it," said Borosage. "You just shouldn't equate fiscal responsibility with cutting spending."
The Krugman Democrats acknowledge that Obama needed to pick off a couple of Republicans in order to get his recovery package through the Senate. But they think the White House blundered with its initial emphasis on post-partisanship and talk of winning 80 votes in the Senate.
"They made a huge mistake in their messaging on the recovery plan. They allowed post-partisanship to be a louder message than the crisis," said Borosage, referring to the Obama White House. "Instead of the debate being: 'Why aren't the Republicans joining this utterly necessary thing?' The debate became: 'How many votes does Obama have from Republicans?'"
ABC News' Ferdous Al-Faruque contributed to this report.
February 11, 2009 | Permalink | Share | User Comments (4)
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
Krugman needs to grow a set.
Posted by: Sluggo | Feb 11, 2009 2:55:04 AM
It isn't Paul Krugman who 'needs to grow a set'. It is the President.
We gave him a mandate to fix the economy after the Conservative Republicans destroyed it with Reaganomics (Freidman's supply-side economics).
Obama has wasted too much time and effort trying to get Republicans to act responsibly. They don't know how.
Bipartianship is dead (except for three Republicans who are being targeted for elimination in their next elections).
Why can't we learn from history and not make FDR's mistake?
Republican demands to give more tax cuts to the rich and starving education, science and desperate states is insane.
This is NO way to create jobs. It is preserving the superiority of the rich in our class system.
We need to provide jobs and secure homes now and stimulate growth for the future.
Count me proudly as a Krugman Democrat.
Posted by: stsabc | Feb 11, 2009 3:53:10 AM
This is just a rush to grab power. They passed TARP, needed more, and here we are. One this money is spent, if it is somehow working, and more is needed, they can pass another bill. Likely it will be easier with something to show for the first bill. If it tanks, then we can look for other options.
Posted by: Federalistblogs | Feb 11, 2009 4:50:33 AM
If simply spending money was the answer we all should be millionaires. I don't think anyone disagrees with Obama that some sort of spending is needed but where he is getting resistance is how he wants to spend it. The sums of money are enormous so a sprited debate should be expected and accepted-none of it needs to be about politics rather it should be about doing the right thing for all of us.
As for Krugman, I know he is an expert but experts can be wrong too. (by the way, where was his voice in early summer?)
(and to the Reagan hater) we had a string of 25 years of reasonable prosperity but even in this Presidents speech he admitted it was the banks( too bad he didn't have the courage to include fannie and freddie in this)practicing unsafe lending that caused this mess. While running a year on year balanced budget is a good achievment not one President or Congress has ever addressed the ever increasing size of unfunded mandates now said to be near 50 trillion.
Posted by: david | Feb 11, 2009 6:26:51 AM
Post a comment
POLITICAL VIDEOS
THE NOTE BLOG ROLL
- ABC News -- George Stephanopoulos
- ABC News -- Jake Tapper
- ABC News Politics
- ABC News -- The Numbers
- ABC News -- The Blotter
- The American Prospect -- TAPPED
- The Atlantic -- Politics Channel
- The Boston Globe -- Political Intelligence
- Center for American Progress -- Think Progress
- Center for Responsive Politics
- The Chicago Sun-Times -- Lynn Sweet
- The Chicago Tribune -- The Swamp
- Drudge Report
- FactCheck.org
- FiveThirtyEight
- Heritage Foundation -- The Foundry
- The Hill -- Briefing Room
- The Hotline
- The Huffington Post
- The Los Angeles Times -- Top of the Ticket
- NPR -- Political Junkie
- National Review -- The Corner
- The New Republic -- The Plank
- The New York Times -- The Caucus
- Newsweek -- The Gaggle
- Political Wire -- Taegan Goddard
- Politico -- Ben Smith
- Politico -- Mike Allen’s Playbook
- PolitiFact
- Real Clear Politics
- Talking Points Memo
- Time -- The Page
- USA Today -- On Politics
- Variety -- Wilshire & Washington
- The Wall Street Journal -- Capital Journal
- The Washington Post -- The Fix
- The Washington Post -- 44



