Rick Klein is ABC News' Senior Political Reporter and author of The Note's morning look at the upcoming day in politics. Throughout the day, ABC News' political team contributes to The Note with the very latest news and analysis from the nation's capital.
To email Rick Klein, click here.
RECENT POSTS
- ‘Top Line’ with Sally Quinn -- Inside the First Obama State Dinner
- GOPers to Biden: Stop Using Stimulus Jobs Numbers
- Exit Ramps: Democrats Grow Restless on Afghanistan Strategy
- The Note's Must-Reads for Tuesday, November 24, 2009
- RNC's Communications Chief Resigns
- A Better Palin Than Tina Fey?
- ‘Top Line’ -- ‘America’s Next Great Pundit’
- ‘Top Line’ at the Movies: ‘Outside the Law: Stories from Guantanamo’
- Mass. GOP Gov’s Candidate Chooses Openly Gay Running Mate
- Workplace Diversity: Lines in Sand Make Mess for Dems
THE NOTE CATEGORIES
- 2010
- Afghanistan
- Bill Clinton
- CIA
- Congress
- Democratic party
- Environment
- Financial Reform
- GOP
- Gov. Mark Sanford
- Gov. Sarah Palin
- Guantanamo
- Health Care
- Hillary Clinton
- Immigration
- Iran
- Iraq
- John McCain
- Mitt Romney
- North Korea
- Obama Agenda
- Politics Live
- President Obama
- Republican Party
- Ronald Reagan
- Sen. John Ensign
- Senate
- Sonia Sotomayor
- Stimulus
- Sunday Shows
- Supreme Court
- Ted Kennedy
- The Note
- The Note Must-Reads
- Top Line
- Vice President Biden
- Virginia
MONTHLY ARCHIVES
« Previous | Main | Next »
AG's Marijuana Policy Slammed by GOP Senator
March 19, 2009 10:39 AM
ABC News' Teddy Davis and Brian Hartman report:
Iowa Sen. Chuck Grassley (R) ripped into Attorney General Holder on Thursday for announcing on Wednesday that the Obama administration will ease enforcement of federal marijuana laws in states that have authorized the use of medical marijuana.
"This Attorney General is not doing health care reform any good," said Grassley. "The first rule of medicine - 'do no harm' - is being violated by the Attorney General with this decision."
Grassley, the top Republican on the Senate Finance Committee, said that Holder's announcement is "counterproductive" to US goals on preventive medicine because the farmer-turned-senator sees marijuana as a "gateway" drug which leads to addiction to more potent drugs including methamphetamine.
The Justice Department announced Wednesday that federal agents will target marijuana distributors only when they violate both federal and state law. This is a departure from policy under the Bush administration, which targeted dispensaries under federal law even if they complied with the state's law allowing sales of medical marijuana.
Grassley singled out Holder for criticism while participating in a roundtable with reporters on health-care reform at the Kaiser Family Foundation in Washington, DC.
On the contentious issue of whether health care reform will include a public insurance option which will compete with private insurers, Grassley said, "At this point, everything is on the table."
"Everything has to be on the table if you are negotiating in good faith," he said. "Abortion is the only issue that is not compromisable."
Although he said that a public insurance option must be on the table, he also expressed his view that "government is not a fair competitor." Grassley cited a study by the Lewin Group which he said indicates that a government insurance option will lead 118 million Americans to opt out of private insurance. He thinks this will have the effect of shrinking the private insurance market and driving up costs, particularly on small businesses. Advocates of a public insurance option think the public will benefit from the government applying downard pressure on prices.
Grassley was emphatic that health care reform must happen this year to have a chance.
"If it doesn't get done this year, I don't think it will get done in the next four years," said Grassley pointing to the election calendar.
The Iowa senator said that he has "not thought through" what the employer contribution should be to their employees' health care costs.
He said, however, that he wants to consider the "problems they are having" in Massachusetts, which implemented a universal health care plan, in addition to problems faced in California, which scuttled health-care reform due in part to disagreements over the mandated employer contribution.
Grassley bristled at the suggestion that the GOP would pay a greater political price than Democrats if health-care reform fails.
"Can you tell me where you are coming out with a question like that?" asked Grassley. He sought to dispel the notion that Republicans want health care reform to fail by pointing to workshops the party has held to educate members of Congress on the finer points of policy. He also said that no Republican senator has told him that he doesn't want health care reform to happen, adding that his GOP colleagues are never shy about telling him that he is cooperating too closely with Senate Democrats.
Grassley sidestepped a question about whether his concerns about a public insurance option would apply to legislation permitting non-government employees to join the Federal Employees Health Benefit Plan (FEHBP), a government-administered set of private insurance options.
Some progessive leaders with close ties to the White House, like Andy Stern of the Service Employees International Union (SEIU), have told ABC News that they think an FEHBP-style plan can become an attractive compromise since it exercises less market power than inviting all Americans to buy into Medicare, the government insurance program that is currently limited to those over 65.
Asked to sum up the key dividing line between the parties on health care, Grassley pointed to disagreements over the extent of government involvement in offering insurance.
"The major difference is the extent to which we will have a market-based insurance system or a government-based insurance system," said Grassley.
March 19, 2009 | Permalink | Share | User Comments (39)
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
...the farmer-turned-senator sees marijuana as a "gateway" drug which leads to addiction to more potent drugs...
__________________________________
Just because he sees it that way doesn't make it reality. How about some facts and/or proof?
Posted by: Deep Release | Mar 19, 2009 10:53:28 AM
"Grassley cited a study by the Lewin Group which he said indicates that a government insurance option will lead 118 million Americans to opt out of private insurance."
So, when given a free choice he fears that a majority of Americans will flock to government run healthcare over for-profit insurance companies? Think about that for a moment - he is against public health care because he fears it will be TOO POPULAR.
Who does he work for again?
Posted by: jhw539 | Mar 19, 2009 10:55:37 AM
Follow Ron Paul on this one. Check out the recent debate between Ron Paul and one of those Baldwin actors on Larry King.
Posted by: Huh | Mar 19, 2009 11:01:17 AM
Are we to listen to a man who just a couple of days ago asked and encouraged people to commit suicide?
Posted by: hang | Mar 19, 2009 11:01:55 AM
jhw539 - THANK YOU!!
Posted by: hang | Mar 19, 2009 11:03:00 AM
The Netherlands decriminalized marijuana *35 years ago*, and it is sold legally in government-registered shops. It is taxed,too. Citizens may raise four plants apiece for personal comsumption. The Netherlands has lower rates of marijuana use than neighboring countries that prohibit it. In addition, the WHO rates them as being the healthiest nation. As far as it being a "gateway drug" that is ridiculous. The real gateway drug is alcohol, but since so many "upstanding citizens" are addicited to it, they won't admit it......... LEGALIZE IT AND TAX IT !!!!
Posted by: fuzzy | Mar 19, 2009 11:05:29 AM
Pursuing and prosecuting marijuana users is a waste of time of resource yet Republicans don't see a problem with that? As for gateway drug....so is tobacco and alchohol yet they are legal..
Posted by: indy_voter | Mar 19, 2009 11:06:20 AM
DEFINITION: Republican --- a person who has never smoked marijuana....... (How can these people be so frikkin uptight about everything?)
Posted by: fuzzy | Mar 19, 2009 11:18:36 AM
Didnt this Man just tell Aig To commit Suicide?
Posted by: Angie In Pa | Mar 19, 2009 11:19:42 AM
How about for at least the next 8 years we do the exact opposite of what the Conservatives/Republicans want? The world might become a better place.
Posted by: Mack | Mar 19, 2009 11:22:54 AM
I think all drugs should be made legalized, but in a controlled environment. The way things are now, we just add to the problem of drug addiction. Control them in a medical setting, but allow addicts to use if they have to. We would have less crime, disease, prostitution, and other hideous acts by people who will do anything to get their next fix. Besides, it would pull the carpet right out from under the drug cartels that are sadly making billions of dollars off drug addicts and the crimes they commit. Sad that there are so many addicted people who are useless to society, but that won't change. Let's just make it legal and the government can get the money. Let the drug cartels go broke.
Posted by: geecee | Mar 19, 2009 11:27:40 AM
So Grassley is for big government when it comes to pot. The federal gov is just getting out of the way of state governments, normally something that repubs can stand behind. Frankly this is an issue probably best left up to states, the fed govt should have better uses of their time.
Posted by: Ordermonger | Mar 19, 2009 11:31:28 AM
Could Grassley be any more wrong? About either issue!
Posted by: Kathleen | Mar 19, 2009 11:46:21 AM
When will Republicans learn their Christo-Fascist Dictatorship is over? Republicans should stop trying to ram their extremist, religion-based, lunatic fringe ideology down the throats of other Americans.
Posted by: Sammy | Mar 19, 2009 11:49:07 AM
Oregon has propossed the state take over the sales of medical MJ...right now, medical users can grow their own...Haven't seen these severely ill people moving up to shooting heroin...and prevents them getting hooked on painkillers..might be something Rush L. might look into
Posted by: cowgirl | Mar 19, 2009 11:57:17 AM
I think Grassley overdosed on his viagra and is having a testosterone rush
Posted by: cowgirl | Mar 19, 2009 11:58:40 AM
another republican genius with his deep, well thought out plans ,based on actual facts.
after the last 8 years of such "geniuses" leading this country ,its no small wonder we are where we are today.
Posted by: Lenny | Mar 19, 2009 12:00:39 PM
always the insurance come first.
insurance = ponzi scheme ,where the total pay for the fraction's problems.
if that isnt socialism what is?
there are immediate ,satisfying ,long term fixes that could be done to the insurance industry ,but said fixes would decrease profit margins and allow less skimming and conniving .
republican politicians like this knucklehead will fight tooth and nail for the insurance industry (aig) to remain unchanged with little to no transparency or real regulations (i.e. those regulations with painful penalties/consequences for those who abuse the system) because the republicans (and way too many "democrats" ,most blue dog moderates who need to be purged from the democratic party to begin with ) are ,have been ,and will continue to be on the insurance lobby's payroll ,under the table of course.
insurance is ,for many things , legally required ,and as such MUST BE MOST TIGHTLY REGULATED!
Posted by: Tom | Mar 19, 2009 12:17:00 PM
when a state or federal government requires by law(s) a private citizen or citizens to pay a private entity for a service of dubious merit (insurance) or face legal ramifications , i really think the private entities alluded to previously must definitely be very very closely watched and very very tightly regulated ,as well as the governments ties ,both public and private,to such third parties . basically the aig mess stinks and it happened over the last 4-8 years ,not the last 4 months as well.
seeing that aig is an insurance company ,does anyone have a problem with more regulations on companies like aig ? and why should private insurance companies be running the show in this country these days ,more-or-less ? if insurance is required by law ,and upheld by law, why cant the taxpayers get some of the loot too? OH NO ,GOVERNMENT INSURANCE IS (GASP) SOCIALISM!! OH NO!!!
insurance being legally required gives insurance companies a very big stick to beat up on consumers with ,if they so desire. i am sure benjamin franklin is rolling in his grave right now ,he saw this insurance debacle coming for sure.
Posted by: Dean | Mar 19, 2009 12:36:50 PM
We need to go back to the banks just being banks-not hedge funds and investment companies, and insurance companies, just insuring..break them apart..inact glass-steagal type legislation again, which the republican congress did away with..to promote unfettered capitalism...realise there is no such thing as ethical behavior when it comes to greed, that those who go unchecked will manipulate markets..We should have seen this coming since "ENRON"..it wasn't any different than what was going on in gas prices, and the markets..it was lies and manipulation.
Posted by: cowgirl | Mar 19, 2009 12:51:56 PM
Post a comment
POLITICAL VIDEOS
THE NOTE BLOG ROLL
- ABC News -- George Stephanopoulos
- ABC News -- Jake Tapper
- ABC News Politics
- ABC News -- The Numbers
- ABC News -- The Blotter
- The American Prospect -- TAPPED
- The Atlantic -- Politics Channel
- The Boston Globe -- Political Intelligence
- Center for American Progress -- Think Progress
- Center for Responsive Politics
- The Chicago Sun-Times -- Lynn Sweet
- The Chicago Tribune -- The Swamp
- Drudge Report
- FactCheck.org
- FiveThirtyEight
- Heritage Foundation -- The Foundry
- The Hill -- Briefing Room
- The Hotline
- The Huffington Post
- The Los Angeles Times -- Top of the Ticket
- NPR -- Political Junkie
- National Review -- The Corner
- The New Republic -- The Plank
- The New York Times -- The Caucus
- Newsweek -- The Gaggle
- Political Wire -- Taegan Goddard
- Politico -- Ben Smith
- Politico -- Mike Allen’s Playbook
- PolitiFact
- Real Clear Politics
- Talking Points Memo
- Time -- The Page
- USA Today -- On Politics
- Variety -- Wilshire & Washington
- The Wall Street Journal -- Capital Journal
- The Washington Post -- The Fix
- The Washington Post -- 44

