Rick Klein is ABC News' Senior Political Reporter and author of The Note's morning look at the upcoming day in politics. Throughout the day, ABC News' political team contributes to The Note with the very latest news and analysis from the nation's capital.
To email Rick Klein, click here.
RECENT POSTS
- A Better Palin Than Tina Fey?
- ‘Top Line’ -- ‘America’s Next Great Pundit’
- ‘Top Line’ at the Movies: ‘Outside the Law: Stories from Guantanamo’
- Mass. GOP Gov’s Candidate Chooses Openly Gay Running Mate
- Workplace Diversity: Lines in Sand Make Mess for Dems
- The Note's Must-Reads for Monday, November 23, 2009
- AARP Endorses Cloture Vote, Not Yet Reid's Bill
- McCain Targets Ben Nelson on Health Care Vote
- 'Top Line' -- Ambassador Oprah? Senator Oprah?
- Sen. Brown: Health Care Bill Needs More Subsidies
THE NOTE CATEGORIES
- 2010
- Afghanistan
- Bill Clinton
- CIA
- Congress
- Democratic party
- Environment
- Financial Reform
- GOP
- Gov. Mark Sanford
- Gov. Sarah Palin
- Guantanamo
- Health Care
- Hillary Clinton
- Immigration
- Iran
- Iraq
- John McCain
- Mitt Romney
- North Korea
- Obama Agenda
- Politics Live
- President Obama
- Republican Party
- Ronald Reagan
- Sen. John Ensign
- Senate
- Sonia Sotomayor
- Stimulus
- Sunday Shows
- Supreme Court
- Ted Kennedy
- The Note
- The Note Must-Reads
- Top Line
- Vice President Biden
- Virginia
MONTHLY ARCHIVES
« Previous | Main | Next »
SEIU Chief: 'Hard to Imagine' Supporting Specter Unless He Backs EFCA
May 04, 2009 9:05 PM
ABC News' Rick Klein reports:
A second prominent labor leader told ABC News today that Sen. Arlen Specter is not guaranteed to get union support in next year’s Democratic primary, as Specter’s position on the Employee Free Choice Act draws continued scrutiny.
Andy Stern, the president of the SEIU, today met with Rep. Joe Sestak, D-Pa., who is considering running against Specter. Specter, D-Pa., left the Republican Party last week and announced that he’d run in the Democratic primary in 2010.
After the meeting, Stern said he told Sestak that, based on conversations with labor leaders in Pennsylvania, Specter is highly unlikely to get the support of organized labor if he votes against EFCA, the pro-unionizing measure that critics call "card-check."
"There’s no way they’re ever going to be supporting someone who is seen as thwarting this opportunity," Stern told ABC. "It is hard to imagine any union supporting a candidate in the Democratic Party for the US Senate who doesn’t have strong positions on both healthcare and Employee Free Choice."
Stern stressed that he is not endorsing any candidate. Though Specter has maintained his opposition to EFCA -- a position he reiterated yesterday on the Sunday talk shows -- Stern said he hopes Specter will ultimately support a compromise.
"No one's going to get exactly what they want," he said. "So the question is, where is his flexibility, on not letting his idea of perfection stand in the way of progress."
Labor leaders in Pennsylvania, Stern said, "will evaluate where he stands not just based on what he says, but what he does." Sestak supports the Employee Free Choice Act, which would make it far easier for workers to form unions, but which is fiercely opposed by business interests that are casting the bill as a job-killer.
Today on ABCNews.com’s "Top Line," Richard Trumka, the secretary-treasurer of the AFL-CIO, also warned that Specter may not get labor support, despite the commitment of Democrats led by President Obama and Gov. Ed Rendell, D-Pa., to support Specter next year.
Said Trumka: "Those decisions will be made by people in the state, and our members in the state know who will stand with them. And if Arlen Specter -- he stood with them in the past -- if he continues to stand with them, they'll support him. If he doesn't, they won't support him."
Sestak told Greg Sargent of The Washington Post's Plum Line blog today that he's likely to get in the race if Specter doesn’t change some of his positions.
"If he doesn't demonstrate that he has shifted his position on a number of issues, I would not hesitate at all to get in," Sestak said.
May 4, 2009 | Permalink | Share | User Comments (7)
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
Obama is not exactly locking up union support with his indifference to card check and warmth shown to Specter.
Posted by: matt | May 4, 2009 10:10:49 PM
Specter is just a placeholder. We will need him for one or two big votes until mid terms.
The people of PA will speak and Specter will go fishing with Santorum
rrraaaahhhhh~~~~ demmmmms on the attack
Posted by: Omentum | May 4, 2009 10:47:22 PM
Swine influenza is an acute pig, infectious respiratory diseases. Characterized by sudden, coughing, difficulty in breathing, fever and rapid vesting.
Posted by: runescape accounts | May 5, 2009 3:38:10 AM
The mideterms will bring a whole raft of Republicans since there is no Zero on the ballot ... lots of the folks who voted won't bother. You wait. Turnout of the Republican faithful will be tremendous. Those who voted for the big Zero and no regret that vote will now want to make sure that there are the constitutional checks and balances to slow down the socialist onslaught.
Posted by: beebop | May 5, 2009 9:19:49 AM
As long as the GOP remains in the grip of the radical right and their party leader, Limbaugh, they will continue to dwindle. A recent poll that I saw indicated only 27% of eligible voters identified themselves as Republican. Unless they can find a way toward the middle and reach out to a more diverse population, they will continue to be the party of Big Zeros.
Posted by: William J. LePetomane | May 5, 2009 9:36:26 AM
Mr. Specter is a poor, tired, sad old man who should have retired when he had a few shreds of dignity left. He has become a laughingstock. If I were a union member, I would be embarrassed to support him.
Posted by: haskell | May 5, 2009 9:41:30 AM
If he has a brain left in his head he won't support card check..Every company left in the US that can leave will the rest of us will just close...Anybody that supports that is against our constitution because it makes sure the "secret" ballot is a right not an if we allow it vote...
Posted by: Ann J | May 5, 2009 2:58:34 PM
Post a comment
POLITICAL VIDEOS
THE NOTE BLOG ROLL
- ABC News -- George Stephanopoulos
- ABC News -- Jake Tapper
- ABC News Politics
- ABC News -- The Numbers
- ABC News -- The Blotter
- The American Prospect -- TAPPED
- The Atlantic -- Politics Channel
- The Boston Globe -- Political Intelligence
- Center for American Progress -- Think Progress
- Center for Responsive Politics
- The Chicago Sun-Times -- Lynn Sweet
- The Chicago Tribune -- The Swamp
- Drudge Report
- FactCheck.org
- FiveThirtyEight
- Heritage Foundation -- The Foundry
- The Hill -- Briefing Room
- The Hotline
- The Huffington Post
- The Los Angeles Times -- Top of the Ticket
- NPR -- Political Junkie
- National Review -- The Corner
- The New Republic -- The Plank
- The New York Times -- The Caucus
- Newsweek -- The Gaggle
- Political Wire -- Taegan Goddard
- Politico -- Ben Smith
- Politico -- Mike Allen’s Playbook
- PolitiFact
- Real Clear Politics
- Talking Points Memo
- Time -- The Page
- USA Today -- On Politics
- Variety -- Wilshire & Washington
- The Wall Street Journal -- Capital Journal
- The Washington Post -- The Fix
- The Washington Post -- 44

