Rick Klein is ABC News' Senior Political Reporter and author of The Note's morning look at the upcoming day in politics. Throughout the day, ABC News' political team contributes to The Note with the very latest news and analysis from the nation's capital.
To email Rick Klein, click here.
RECENT POSTS
- RNC's Communications Chief Resigns
- A Better Palin Than Tina Fey?
- ‘Top Line’ -- ‘America’s Next Great Pundit’
- ‘Top Line’ at the Movies: ‘Outside the Law: Stories from Guantanamo’
- Mass. GOP Gov’s Candidate Chooses Openly Gay Running Mate
- Workplace Diversity: Lines in Sand Make Mess for Dems
- The Note's Must-Reads for Monday, November 23, 2009
- AARP Endorses Cloture Vote, Not Yet Reid's Bill
- McCain Targets Ben Nelson on Health Care Vote
- 'Top Line' -- Ambassador Oprah? Senator Oprah?
THE NOTE CATEGORIES
- 2010
- Afghanistan
- Bill Clinton
- CIA
- Congress
- Democratic party
- Environment
- Financial Reform
- GOP
- Gov. Mark Sanford
- Gov. Sarah Palin
- Guantanamo
- Health Care
- Hillary Clinton
- Immigration
- Iran
- Iraq
- John McCain
- Mitt Romney
- North Korea
- Obama Agenda
- Politics Live
- President Obama
- Republican Party
- Ronald Reagan
- Sen. John Ensign
- Senate
- Sonia Sotomayor
- Stimulus
- Sunday Shows
- Supreme Court
- Ted Kennedy
- The Note
- The Note Must-Reads
- Top Line
- Vice President Biden
- Virginia
MONTHLY ARCHIVES
« Previous | Main | Next »
House Dems Unveil Health Care Plan
June 19, 2009 3:55 PM
ABC News' Z. Byron Wolf Reports: Senators aren’t the only ones drafting health care reform legislation. House Republicans unveiled their plan earlier this week. And today, House Democrats from three Committees proposed a “draft text” that looks similar to the version being considered in the Senate HELP Committee.
At a press conference, Democrats in the House unveiling their own draft health care reform plan today sounded open to anything to get health care reform passed, but what’s in their draft does not look open to much at all.
Rep. George Miller, who chairs the House Education and Labor Committee said “THIS year will be THE year… If there's one thing that is off the table it is saying no to health care reform,” Miller said.
But in the House Democrats’ plan are the very things that, for Republicans, are non-starters: For starters, a public health insurance plan, an expansion of Medicare, and a mandate to make employers (as well as individuals) contribute to the health care of their employees.
“Today health insurance for most American families is one big surprise. You go to use it and you find that it’s not what you think it is,” said Miller of the need for a public alternative to serve as a reliable counterweight to the market.
“I think there's a lot of misinformation about public option. A lot of people think it’s going to be a government takeover,” said Rep. Henry Waxman, D-Calif, who chairs the House Energy and Commerce Committee. He said the insurance market is “dysfunctional” and only with a public option can there be a level playing field.
“We want people to be able to choose their plan. Just like federal employees,” Waxman said. “One of the choices will be a public plan that will be on a level playing field. A choice. No mandate for anybody to be in it,” Waxman said.
Several of the Democrats at today’s press conference said their plan was an “American” plan and that it fostered choice by allowing Americans to choose a public option as opposed to a private one.
What remains to be seen is how much the House Democrats’ plan, which bears striking resemblance to the Senate plan offered in the Health Committee there by Democrats, would cost. Just one part of the Senate Health Committee version got a $1 trillion estimate over 10 years by the Congressional Budget Office even before the addition of a public insurance option and was predicted to leave tens of millions of Americans without insurance. Miller said the House version would cover up to 90 percent of Americans – a similar number. But Miller did not yet have a CBO estimate for how much the House Democrats’ bill would cost.
The ranking Republican on Waxman’s Energy and Commerce Committee, Rep. Joe Barton, who in March at a White House summit pledged to work toward bipartisan health care reform said what Democrats were proposing was not bipartisan and would not ultimately pass Congress.
“Democrats didn’t include us,” said Rep. Joe Barton, R-Tex, shortly after the press conference where House Democrats announced their plan – it was the first he had seen of the plan too.
“They didn’t want out input and had apparently a pre-conceived notion that they wanted to nationalize healthcare and spend trillions of dollars in this econ situation that we don’t have and um that created a bill that has very little chance to ultimately succeed.”
See more of Barton’s interview with ABC News' Jon Karl on World News tonight.
Text of the House Democrats’ draft can be read here.
A summary of the House Democrats' plan is here.
June 19, 2009 | Permalink | Share | User Comments (29)
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
Why do I have that familiar feeling that when ever I read something like this I'm about to get screwed?
Posted by: LongT | Jun 19, 2009 5:16:33 PM
The whole problem with the health care INDUSTRY is insurance companies. We don't need more types of insurance, we need plain and simple health care. We shouldn't have insurance companies deciding on our health care. They are in it for a profit ! They are not in it to provide health care, but to deny health care and make money !
Posted by: fuzzy | Jun 19, 2009 5:26:36 PM
fuzzy; Agreed, but that's the problem isn't it; the congress and the insurance industry are pardners in the fleecing of the public. I'm convinced of it.
Posted by: LongT | Jun 19, 2009 5:38:36 PM
Well, if a "bipartisan" bill meant they couldn't do what they said they were going to do, why should they listen? I doubt the Democrats were materially consulted on matters such as the invasion of Iraq etc.
That said, it's just good manners to hear the other guys' ideas, but most of these guys have been saying the same thing for months.
Posted by: T | Jun 19, 2009 5:53:43 PM
T, "I doubt the Democrats were materially consulted on matters such as the invasion of Iraq etc." Huh! They also voted to go to Iraq. Check out the vote. The left side of the isle just wants people to forget about that.
Posted by: LongT | Jun 19, 2009 5:58:13 PM
I don't know who's to blame, the medical community or the insurance community but, I recently had a major operation, 1 day in intensive care and 4 days in hospital, the bill was over $274,000. Now, let's repeat that a few tens of thousands of times per year and you know what, it gets to be REAL money for someone.
Posted by: JR | Jun 19, 2009 5:58:20 PM
Just 20 years overdue. This will save a lot of families with insurance from bankruptcy.
Posted by: name | Jun 19, 2009 6:00:53 PM
"They also voted to go to Iraq. Check out the vote. The left side of the isle just wants people to forget about that."
And the right side want you to forget that they lied to get that approval.
Posted by: JR | Jun 19, 2009 6:01:10 PM
This is the problem here , they want to sell it for a trillion dollars which is an abomination. The truth is that it will cost more. It will have poor oversight because the Gov has never been managed properly, too much bureocracy and too many "scratch my back and I scratch yours". People will flock and overload the system, the chances to get good healthcare will be diminish.And more important, nobody has taken the appropiate time to examine the pros and cons. Just like the bail out this bill is going to be shovel down the taxpayers throat without proper consent of the people.
Posted by: Frank | Jun 19, 2009 6:14:06 PM
I'd like the members of congress opposed to this bill to give up their "poorly run" government provided health care and sign up for a private, profit based policy that the rest of americans are stuck with. Profiting off sick people such as accepting credit cards at the hospital is a tell of health care's primary focus: corporate profits.
Posted by: 92F150 | Jun 19, 2009 6:35:34 PM
25 cents of every dollar spent on healthcare goes to process the billing to settle claims between hospitals and insurance companies. A true single payer plan would reduce costs 25% by ending this practice. - ITWARZ
Posted by: ITWARZ | Jun 19, 2009 7:44:16 PM
"I doubt the Democrats were materially consulted on matters such as the invasion of Iraq etc. '
Well, they VOTED for it -- so I guess that means they were "materially consulted". You libs all seem to conveniently forget that vote back in Oct. 2002.
Posted by: Get Real | Jun 19, 2009 7:46:28 PM
I know a lot of House Dems and a few Senate Dems who support a single payer plan have compromised to support this plan and get it passed. What have the Repubs compromised on in order to get reform through? Nothing - because they seem to care more for political posturing than addressing America's healthcare crisis. I am not a Dem and I am sure there are some Repubs who care about more than sloganeering, but so far I have not heard from them.
Posted by: Mark from atlanta | Jun 19, 2009 8:59:42 PM
I read this article a few days ago....."WASHINGTON (AP) — The wife of a senator playing a lead role on a national health care overhaul sits on the boards of four health care companies, one of several examples of lawmakers with ties to the medical industry. Jackie Clegg Dodd, wife of Sen. Chris Dodd, serves on the boards of Javelin Pharmaceuticals Inc., Cardiome Pharma Corp., Brookdale Senior Living, and Pear Tree Pharmaceuticals, a financial disclosure report the senator released Friday shows."
Posted by: CW | Jun 19, 2009 9:09:05 PM
Government ran healthcare? One only needs to look at the way Medicare, Medicaid and the VA is ran to know that Washington doesn't have a clue. As a former VA employee, I KNOW that the employees that work for the VA are paid A LOT more than the private sector. Why? The unionization of federal employees would be my best guess.
Posted by: mom | Jun 19, 2009 10:24:21 PM
force the drug companies to charge us no more than they charge Canadians.
Give us equal health benefits that congress has. Lets see our congress say we are not equal to them.
Posted by: edward maisel | Jun 19, 2009 11:29:50 PM
Does the Rep. party want some cheese to go with their whine? The American people want health care!! They need to get onboard and quit being the party of NO!!
Posted by: Jim | Jun 20, 2009 12:21:46 AM
"25 cents of every dollar spent on healthcare goes to process the billing to settle claims between hospitals and insurance companies. A true single payer plan would reduce costs 25% by ending this practice. - ITWARZ"
LOL....ONLY IN A WORLD WHERE THAT SINGLE PAYER DECIDES WHAT THE COST STRUCTURES & COVERAGES WILL BE. You actually think there will be complete agreement and acceptance of a govt mandated cost & coverage plan?
Our govt, who cant write a bill and then explain how the language of it changed and how everone vote don it but didnt catch it!
Our govt, whose Treasury dept cant even READ the LAW where it pertains to the IG in charge of TARP oversight!
Our govt ...that cant control the fraud in Medicare, Medicaid, & SS.
Our govt, who get blasted left & right for mistakes and holes in the medical coverages we give our Vets!
Take a REAL look at the actual implemeantations in the systems already in use in the world. NOT the fantasy stories, but the real workings. The real costs. Many here have touted the Swiss system.
Funny thing though, they never mention the Swiss system has pre-existing condition clauses. The govt only pays 25% of the costs and therefore for a family of four, the cost per month for reasonable coverage is still over a $1000 US dollars! AND they only have a population of about 7.5 Million people, a far cry from our estimated 340-350 million!
Posted by: Mike_C | Jun 20, 2009 1:35:37 AM
There is no thought given to incrementally fixing the system, which is the only serious way to approach the problem. This would allow for course corrections on parts of programs that aren't working as advertised. We are being told that everything is a disaster, everything an emergency, and if we don't sign on blindly to all of it now the world will end. Pretty much what we were told about the bailouts and stimulus bills. Guthrie said it best "Some will rob you with a six gun and some with a fountain pen."
Posted by: Dudley T | Jun 20, 2009 8:21:59 AM
The USA is not 1st in anything-health care-education-business-etc-get over it-43 million people without health care-who do you think picks up the tab for this?
Health care costs will go up 9% this yerar-did you get a 9% raise?
Posted by: derni | Jun 20, 2009 8:42:39 AM
Post a comment
POLITICAL VIDEOS
THE NOTE BLOG ROLL
- ABC News -- George Stephanopoulos
- ABC News -- Jake Tapper
- ABC News Politics
- ABC News -- The Numbers
- ABC News -- The Blotter
- The American Prospect -- TAPPED
- The Atlantic -- Politics Channel
- The Boston Globe -- Political Intelligence
- Center for American Progress -- Think Progress
- Center for Responsive Politics
- The Chicago Sun-Times -- Lynn Sweet
- The Chicago Tribune -- The Swamp
- Drudge Report
- FactCheck.org
- FiveThirtyEight
- Heritage Foundation -- The Foundry
- The Hill -- Briefing Room
- The Hotline
- The Huffington Post
- The Los Angeles Times -- Top of the Ticket
- NPR -- Political Junkie
- National Review -- The Corner
- The New Republic -- The Plank
- The New York Times -- The Caucus
- Newsweek -- The Gaggle
- Political Wire -- Taegan Goddard
- Politico -- Ben Smith
- Politico -- Mike Allen’s Playbook
- PolitiFact
- Real Clear Politics
- Talking Points Memo
- Time -- The Page
- USA Today -- On Politics
- Variety -- Wilshire & Washington
- The Wall Street Journal -- Capital Journal
- The Washington Post -- The Fix
- The Washington Post -- 44

