The Note
Washington's Original and Most Influential Tipsheet

Rick Klein is ABC News' Senior Political Reporter and author of The Note's morning look at the upcoming day in politics. Throughout the day, ABC News' political team contributes to The Note with the very latest news and analysis from the nation's capital.

To email Rick Klein, click here.

November 2009
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30

« Previous | Main | Next »

CIA Spat: Pelosi Vindicated? Not Quite

July 09, 2009 10:35 AM

Karl 2 ABC News’ Jonathan Karl reports: Has House Speaker Nancy Pelosi been vindicated? That's the way the speaker's allies see it. Recent revelations by CIA Director Leon Panetta, the speaker's allies say, prove Pelosi was right when she said the CIA routinely misleads Congress.

That is not, however, the way the CIA sees it.

Pelosi, D-Calif., may feel vindicated, but Republicans are delighted that this latest dust-up revives the controversy surrounding her war of words with the CIA just when it had seemed to fade away.

At issue is a hastily arranged classified briefing by Panetta to the House and Senate Intelligence Committees on June 24. Panetta called the briefing to inform the committee about a covert CIA operation that had begun shortly after September 11, 20001. Panetta himself had just found out about the program and believed Congress should have been informed of it long ago.

The covert operation in question was counter-terrorism program. Intelligence officials tell me it has nothing to do with waterboarding or interrogation, but it was controversial enough that the CIA discontinued it last month, at about the time Panetta first learned of it.

House intelligence chairman Silvestre Reyes, D-Texas, is unhappy that the CIA conducted the program for nearly eight years before Panetta told Congress about it on June 24.

"These notifications have led me to conclude that this committee has been misled, has not been provided full and complete notifications, and (in at least one case) was affirmatively lied to," Reyes wrote in a letter to the top Republican on the Committee, Rep. Pete Hoekstra, R-Mich.

To some Democrats, this is a gotcha moment: proof that Pelosi was right when she said in May that the CIA lied to her about waterboarding in September 2002 and that "they mislead Congress all the time." 

In May 15, shortly after the speaker made her allegations, Panetta jumped to the defense of his agency saying, "it is not our policy or practice to mislead Congress."

But now, in light of Panetta's latest revelation, six Democrats on the Intelligence Committee have fired off a letter to Panetta demanding that he retract his statement and acknowledge Pelosi was right.

"In light of your testimony, we ask that you publicly correct your statement of May 15, 2009," the Democrats wrote Panetta.

No dice. 

"Director Panetta stands by his May 15 statement," says CIA spokesman George Little. "It is not the policy or practice of the CIA to mislead Congress. This Agency and this Director believe it is vital to keep the Congress fully and currently informed. Director Panetta's actions back that up. As the letter from these six representatives notes, it was the CIA itself that took the initiative to notify the oversight committees."

According to an intelligence official familiar with the briefing, Panetta never said the CIA misled Congress.

"He took decisive steps to inform the oversight committees of something that hadn’t been appropriately briefed in the past," the official said. "He didn’t attribute motives to that."

And, in fact, not even Reyes, the Democratic chairman of the intelligence committee, sees this as vindication for Pelosi.

In a statement released last night, Reyes tried to navigate his way to a position somewhere between Panetta and Pelosi. He says he agrees with Panetta that "the Agency does not and will not lie to Congress ... but, in rare instances, certain officers have not adhered to the high standards held, as a rule, by the CIA with respect to truthfulness in reporting."

That's a far cry from Pelosi's statement in May that "they mislead us all the time," but it leaves open the possibility they could have fallen short of those "high standards" of "truthfulness in reporting" when they briefed Pelosi back in September 2002.

July 9, 2009 in Congress | Permalink | Share | User Comments (9)

User Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Anyone who would believe Nancy Pelosi rather than the CIA is, at best, a fool.

Posted by: Ron | Jul 9, 2009 11:18:22 AM

Mr. Panetta,

You took this job when no one else would touch it. They were running away from it. This was the last position to be filled. You took this job I’m quite sure at the request of Obama and out of your innate duty to country and they know it.

Either this is a collective effort to vaporize the Central Intelligence Agency or an overt act to destroy your reputation as they come after you. It’s one or the other that can be seen by any bumpkin including me by a country mile.

If this is an attack on you Mr. Panetta, we will know it as any person, ANY PERSON that has taken a job as a favor and is now being attacked for it would simply submit their resignation.

But, if you stay and participate in this, we will know this is just one more grand illusion from my own party to wit, today I say goodbye too.

My family has belonged to the Democratic Party for 5 generations and today I re-register as Independent as my own party now thinks I’m the idiot. 2010 can’t get here quick enough.

Seymour

Posted by: Seymour | Jul 9, 2009 11:30:47 AM

No one cares about Pelosi and the CIA. The GOP is out of touch to make this some sort of mega-controversy...

Posted by: matt | Jul 9, 2009 11:45:44 AM

We need an open investigation. The ones that calls for an investigation to be behind closed doors is the liars.
It can be done in the open and still protect names.
My guess is that this is a political stunt by a few Democrats in order to cover Pelosi's rear-end. Unfortunatly for them, this doesn't help Pelosi any and it throws the CIA under the bus.

Posted by: toby hill | Jul 9, 2009 5:28:16 PM

Now I'm confused? I have no doubt that Nancy Pelosi was fully briefed about water boarding and is a lying snake according to Leon Panetta. However, now he seems to be telling Congress that the CIA lied to and mislead them? If they didn't that doesn't Leon Panetta owe the American people full disclosure and shouldn't criminal investigates be started? I personally believe the CIA is full of heroes that kept us safe after 9/11, but If Panetta believes his agency is full of liars what is he doing about it?

Posted by: valwayne | Jul 9, 2009 6:29:12 PM

I think the CIA is wise not to tell Pelosi or Reyes--they probably would be on the phone giving operational details to al Qaeda before Pannetta was out of the briefing room.

Posted by: Goldberg | Jul 9, 2009 6:59:40 PM

Pelosi is a Liar. The dems are providing a smoke screen to protect their own. Pelosi should resign. She is a disgrace to the government and the legal citizens of the USA.

Posted by: GGG | Jul 9, 2009 7:03:36 PM

At issue is a hastily arranged classified briefing by Panetta to the House and Senate Intelligence Committees on June 24. Panetta called the briefing to inform the committee about a covert CIA operation that had begun shortly after September 11, 20001. Panetta himself had just found out about the program and believed Congress should have been informed of it long ago.
20001? No such year exists to date.
I guess you Pelosi/Obama apologists
were in such a hurry to print this
BS story that you forgot to Proof Read
it!
It took the Dems in Congress more than
two months to come up with this fable!
Please tell us what this secret
program was.
Pelosi is the liar here and those who
defend here in Congress and
out(Panetta included) should be shown the door. Does 2010 ring a bell?

Posted by: reaganfan | Jul 10, 2009 1:39:16 PM

I'll take an institution vital to home-
land security over an ultraliberal
political hack like Pelosi every time.
She and her fellow think-a-likes in
congress have shown their true colors
so many times it's a wonder they haven't
all been one termers. The C.I.A. has
a very vital purpose in protecting us.
Pelosi has the express purpose of get-
ting reelected.....and she lives in
the ONLY district in America where that
is possible.

Posted by: Trajan | Jul 10, 2009 4:20:00 PM

Post a comment