The Note
Washington's Original and Most Influential Tipsheet

Rick Klein is ABC News' Senior Political Reporter and author of The Note's morning look at the upcoming day in politics. Throughout the day, ABC News' political team contributes to The Note with the very latest news and analysis from the nation's capital.

To email Rick Klein, click here.

November 2009
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30

« Previous | Main | Next »

Liberal Dems See Need for Compromise, Not Excited by Co-ops over Public Plan

July 28, 2009 12:14 PM

Wolf ABC’s Z. Byron Wolf reports:

The three Democrats who make up half the bipartisan “gang of six” negotiating bipartisan health reform at the Senate Finance Committee, took a break from the talks to read in the other Democrats on their Committee.

The closed-door bipartisan talks have been going on for weeks and when there is finally a compromise deal, bringing all the Democrats on board will be a tall order.

Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass, emerged from today’s briefing and told reporters there is agreement on about 80 percent of health reform and that over the next hours and days he sees further agreement emerging.

And while the bipartisan negotiators, led for Democrats by Sens. Max Baucus of Montana, Kent Conrad of North Dakota and Jeff Bingaman of New Mexico, are not ceding some key liberal talking points. Chiefly, they are moving toward a series of non-profit, non-government co-ops to compete with the insurance industry instead of a government-run health plan.

Kerry said he prefers a public plan, but in the interest of enacting reform, he said he also understands  there will have to be some compromise.

“Look my first choice is to have a public plan and to have a public option but we all understand that there is going to be some compromise,” he said.

That was not a sentiment shared by everyone. Sen. Jay Rockefeller, D-West Virginia, who has his own proposal for a public health insurance option, seemed downtrodden as he left the meeting.

He was brusque with reporters and said he has been looking into whether he could support co-ops over a public plan.

“I did a lot of reading on the history of co-ops,” said Rockefeller. “And it is not nice reading.”

Kerry has also offered a plan to the bipartisan negotiators to raise money to pay for health reform by taxing insurance companies that offer high-cost, gold-plated insurance plans. While most economists agree that taxing the high-cost plans is the best way to pay for health reform – it would both drive down costs and raise revenue. But many of those plans are offered as compensation to union members and Democrats are rue to tax unions. Kerry’s proposal would get at those plans by taxing insurance companies offering them instead of the consumers who receive them.

Sen. Debbie Stabenow, who represents Michigan, said that the idea could work if it is placed only on benefits plans that don’t affect most workers. She said the current threshold would be plans worth $25,000.

July 28, 2009 | Permalink | Share | User Comments (7)

User Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

I would imagine Senator Baucus is fighting really hard for the insurance companies since they have been so generous with him. I want the public option. I do not trust any co-op that is not overseen by the government. I am betting Baucus, McCain and McConnell are finding a way to make their insurance lobbyist friends happy. I researched and learned how much money they have taken to help the insurance companies screw the citizens. Makes me sick. Those men are not fit for public office.

Posted by: Sandra | Jul 28, 2009 2:04:11 PM

A national public optoin is the only solution that has the power to actually create change for the better. The piecemeal approach of co-op plans will just add another layer of impenetrable bureaucracy to the current system which insurance and pharmaceutical companies will once again use to benefit their own bottom lines. Compromise on this necessity is nothing short of treason on the part of our legislators, born of greed and deal-making with these powerful lobbies. The sleazeballs opposing this reform to protect their own financial and political interests at teh expense of the American public don't have their GOP counterparts to hide behind and blame any longer. If they waste this golden opportunity to truly make a positive change, we as citizens WILL find out who they are, and we WILL vote them out next election.

Posted by: iamwomaninMI | Jul 28, 2009 3:35:39 PM

Sorry any Health plan will not do. It needs to have a Public Option. I am tried of the Dems caving into the Out of office Republicans. How can you let them Hyjack this as well. Remember they Hyjack the Stiumlus plan and now running all over the place tell everybody it failed. The Health plan will fail too if you let the Repubicans get their way. Public Option is not nogationable.

Posted by: gl | Jul 28, 2009 3:40:53 PM

gl. they hyjacked the stimulas? You're kidding right? Obama's stimulas isn't working so now your trying to blame the repubs?

Posted by: notanobamafan | Jul 28, 2009 4:23:38 PM

A public option is the first step to Medicare for the masses. It is a proposal to double down on an insolvent model that will bankrupt the medical system. How about producing some actual savings from the current system and then spending that money instead of the "smoke and mirrors" future savings the president talks about? Why not include reform to the abusive tort system?

Posted by: Jim Heath | Jul 28, 2009 4:39:26 PM

McConnell, Bohener, Demint etc, traitors to the American people

Posted by: Terry | Jul 28, 2009 5:41:23 PM

Just cram it through and let the chips fall where they may.

There is no reform without the public option so just cram through the bill that 72% of American's want.

Posted by: Chuck | Jul 28, 2009 10:12:20 PM

Post a comment