Rick Klein is ABC News' Senior Political Reporter and author of The Note's morning look at the upcoming day in politics. Throughout the day, ABC News' political team contributes to The Note with the very latest news and analysis from the nation's capital.
To email Rick Klein, click here.
RECENT POSTS
- The Note's Must-Reads for Friday, November 27, 2009
- The Note's Must-Reads for Thursday, November 26, 2009
- Palin to Headline 'TEA Party Convention'
- GOP Strategist Predicts "Purity Test" Resolution Fails at RNC
- Democrats Divide on War Tax
- Gibbs: Obama to Emphasize Exit Strategy
- Price Tags: Costs Rise for Obama on Afghanistan
- The Note's Must-Reads for Wednesday, November 25, 2009
- ‘Top Line’ with Sally Quinn -- Inside the First Obama State Dinner
- GOPers to Biden: Stop Using Stimulus Jobs Numbers
THE NOTE CATEGORIES
- 2010
- Afghanistan
- Bill Clinton
- CIA
- Congress
- Democratic party
- Environment
- Financial Reform
- GOP
- Gov. Mark Sanford
- Gov. Sarah Palin
- Guantanamo
- Health Care
- Hillary Clinton
- Immigration
- Iran
- Iraq
- John McCain
- Mitt Romney
- North Korea
- Obama Agenda
- Politics Live
- President Obama
- Republican Party
- Ronald Reagan
- Sen. John Ensign
- Senate
- Sonia Sotomayor
- Stimulus
- Sunday Shows
- Supreme Court
- Ted Kennedy
- The Note
- The Note Must-Reads
- Top Line
- Vice President Biden
- Virginia
MONTHLY ARCHIVES
« Previous | Main | Next »
The Note: The War President
July 20, 2009 8:34 AM
We’ll get to health care in a moment, but first a reminder that for all the bold domestic initiatives, President Barack Obama is a war president. Unwelcome and uncontrollable developments on the war front have a way of overshadowing everything else. Just ask Lyndon Johnson.
We are not there yet, but consider today’s headlines:
• U.S. soldier taken hostage. The Taliban released a 28-minute video of Pfc Bowe Bergdahl. It’s a typical propaganda video, featuring Private Bergdahl, clearly under duress, speaking about his family and against the war. The vigil in his tiny Idaho hometown dominated the network morning shows and will likely continue to do so.
• Another coalition soldier was killed late yesterday, bringing the death toll so-far this month (52) to the highest since the war started in September 2001.
• The death toll in Iraq and Afghanistan is on the verge of 5,000. A reminder of that toll will come later this week when, the LA Times reports, Iraqi Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki is scheduled to visit Arlington Cemetery.
• A civilian helicopter working with NATO crashed, killing 16 aid workers. British and American fighter jets also crashed over the weekend.
• The Drug Enforcement Administration, belatedly perhaps, is surging its own agents into Afghanistan in an effort to target. The LA Times calls this “a new kind of ‘surge,’ targeting trafficking networks that officials say are increasingly fueling the Taliban insurgency and corrupting the Afghan government.”
• The Wall Street Journal reports that the White House is going to miss a Congressionally mandated deadline to submit its plan for closing Gitmo. Does anybody outside of the administration think the gitmo prison will be closed by January?
• The NYT reports the even bigger detainee problem: the 15,000 held in nightmarish prisons inside Afghanistan. Under consideration: a new, U.S.-built Afghan prison “for the hard-core extremists who are now using the poorly run Afghan corrections system as a camp to train petty thieves and other common criminals to be deadly militants.” Could this Gitmo with a different address?
For now, President Obama seems to have the confidence of the public, most Congressional leaders and even Republicans for his Afghan policy. In today’s ABC News/Washington Post poll, 62 percent give him high marks on Afghanistan.
But President Obama’s political and national security teams know support may be fleeting. Privately, senior White House officials will tell you they have at most a year to start turning things around before losing Congressional Democrats who, if a Republican were in the White House, would already be demanding tangible progress, firm benchmarks, and a timetable for withdrawal.
The War at Home: Obama approval slides, especially on health care
Support for the domestic agenda, however, is beginning to crumble. The latest ABC News/ Washington Post poll has lots of troubling numbers for the White House, but none more than this: For the first time, less than 50 percent approve of his handling of health care.
In just the last month – a time when the White House has put health reform plans front-and-center in Congress – the president’s approval rating on the issue has slid from 57 percent to 49, with disapproval rising from 29 to 44.
The sliver lining for the White House: the public trusts Republicans even less. But, that may not matter much, the Republicans aren’t trying to pass the biggest, most expensive piece of health care reform in the history of the Republic.
The erosion of support has been most pronounced among independents, more of whom now disapprove of Obama’s handling of health care (49 percent) than approve (44 percent).
The poll also shows declining support for the president’s handling of the deficit, unemployment and of the economy overall. As usual, the president is more popular than his positions on the issues, but his personally approval rating (59 percent) has dropped below 60 percent for the first time in the ABC News/Washington Post poll.
“Until the economy heads up, his popularity is likely to continue down,” writes ABC News’ polling guru Gary Langer.
More Troubles
The New York Times finds some really bad news for the Obama Administration at the National Governor’s Association meeting in Biloxi, Mississippi.
The White House wants help from the governors to sell its health plan, instead it is finding they are terrified the states will be stuck paying for it.
“The sentiment among those who were could not have been more consistent, regardless of political party,” report Kevin Sack and Robert Pear. “The governors said in interviews and public sessions that the bills being drafted in Congress would not do enough to curb the growth in health spending. And they said they were convinced that a major expansion of Medicaid would leave them with heavy costs.”
More: “Although many governors said significant change in how the nation handles health care was needed, they said their deep-seated fiscal troubles made it a terrible time to shift costs to the states.
“Each of several health care bills coursing through Congress relies on a large increase in eligibility for Medicaid, the state and federal insurance program for the poor, as one means of moving toward universal coverage.
“Because the states and the federal government share the cost, any increase in eligibility levels, benefits or payments to doctors would impose new burdens on the states unless Washington absorbs them. In at least one of several bills circulating in Congress, the states would eventually pick up a share of the new costs, and the governors fear they cannot count on provisions in other bills that they will not bear costs.”
Does this make it any easier? The health bill may include taxpayer money for abortions.
Here’s a man-bites-dog story in the bailout era:
The CIT Group, which was denied another federal bailout last week, is on the verge of securing private funding to keep it afloat.
“The development appeared to vindicate U.S. regulators, who balked at appeals to help CIT. And it suggested that, unlike in recent months, private capital is available to plaster over cracks in the financial system.”
Tapper has been all over this one
The fired Inspector General of the Corporation for National and Community Service is suing to get his job back.
The Kicker:
“It’s not health care reform to dump more money into Medicaid.” - Gov. Phil Bredesen (D-TN)
“As a governor, my concern is that if we try to cost-shift to the states we’re not going to be in a position to pick up the tab,” - Gov. Christine Gregoire (D-WA)
“I’m personally very concerned about the cost issue, particularly the $1 trillion figures being batted around,” - Gov. Bill Richardson (D-NM)
July 20, 2009 in Afghanistan, Health Care, Iraq, Obama Agenda, The Note | Permalink | Share | User Comments (18)
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
Healthcare Reform?? No where close to the problem! Government intervention, insurance companies and attorneys with their expensive lawsuits have made the system what it is today-----reduce government and taxes.
Posted by: C. Roberts | Jul 20, 2009 9:38:34 AM
To see universal health care just look at universal education. Lets reform the educational systems and health care will take on a new light.
Posted by: toneyal | Jul 20, 2009 9:39:00 AM
At the moment?? we can go to the Doctor and Hospital with no problem. If government becomes involved healthcare will be rationed and often denied as too expensive. The elderly will take the fall---not---the illegal aliens & entitlement (poor). Go to school, get a job and pay taxes so it can be taken from you and given to the lazy and inept. Socialism has (historically) never worked!! In 1966 when The Great Society was born I said, "It's downhill from now on"----it has been just that.
Posted by: C. Roberts | Jul 20, 2009 9:43:27 AM
And war president should not be subject to ceaseless criticism. Lay off...
Posted by: matt | Jul 20, 2009 9:49:05 AM
Maybe if Mr.Obama would just apologize to the Taliban, they will give the soldier back.
Posted by: Terry | Jul 20, 2009 10:07:41 AM
WORLD IN TRANSITION
and in this world
Transition = evolution
Posted by: RobertCecil | Jul 20, 2009 10:20:52 AM
"The War President" ? Hey, he earned the title, he told us all that he "thought about joining the military" when he was in high school. I guess if we can survive this Presidency, we can survive anything.
Posted by: Ron | Jul 20, 2009 10:57:48 AM
I'm also in the "lay off" the president camp. Ask yourself, "What have I done to make a positive contribution?" And health care will go nowhere because we all will not cooperatively help pay the bill. Until we all begin to think and act in a manner that promotes the common good our country will continue its' slide into oblivion.
Jimmy Mac
Posted by: jmczzz | Jul 20, 2009 12:17:09 PM
Yeah... yeah... yeah Mr. Karl (ABC Reporter).... whatever...
He's still one thousand times better than that last guy we had.
Posted by: George W. Bash | Jul 20, 2009 1:16:38 PM
You realize the large majority of the uninsured are young professionals who don't need it until much later, or illegal immigrants that are already exploited as wage slaves. If we just eliminated illegal immigration exploitation, we'd solve two major financial problems in one fail swoop.
Let alone if we subjected all representatives in government to an AUDIT so they would have to PAY their "fair share" of taxes, before they take more of OUR income through threat of asset seizure or forced incarceration or BOTH!!!
Posted by: hmn | Jul 20, 2009 1:29:57 PM
Does the country need to be divided into 2-3 governments..Republican-Democrat- Independent/Misc? And give each party it's geographic domaine...aand let the competition begin...isn't that how business operates/ It seems that our current form of government for years now is so inefficient and divided by discourse and absolutely no compromise expertise or quality statesmanship is appearent in either political party. A.Point
Posted by: Rayg | Jul 20, 2009 1:53:41 PM
Under Obamacare, an 18 y.o. gangbanger
will get a hospital bed ahead of a
70 y.o. college professor. Sounds
great to the Obama crowd......not so
great to the older in our generation.
Let's hope the pre-codgers and
current codgers come out of their
Medicare-induced comas. Medicare will
be gone, too. Did Obama tell them that?
Posted by: Trajan | Jul 20, 2009 2:40:30 PM
Ron | Jul 20, 2009 10:57:48 AM
You uttered; ... "I guess if we can survive this Presidency, we can survive anything."
___________________
Your utterance is LATE, by one (1) occupant of the Whitehouse.
Posted by: bobj72 | Jul 20, 2009 5:13:27 PM
The problem as I see it is that the government wants coverage for all of the US citizens. While a lofty goal, it will come at a significant price for the average family household who is already paying more than they can afford to the government for other entitlement programs. For this average family household, who has paid for their children's pre-kindergarten education, contributes to their healthcare, pays their fair share of taxes; Why in the world should they have to continue to pay more and more for others when they are struggling to make ends meet.
My husband and I would be considered middle class. We are paying over $700 a month for healthcare for our family. We have two children in college. Even after scholarships we will be paying or financing $40,000 alone this year. We added to our house, increasing our mortgage so we could take care of our aging parents. We don't have any money left over even for the government and we are taking care of people who are in need, ailing parents and dependent children. The middle class can not and should not shoulder the burden of the uninsured, especially since many of these uninsured can go into a doctor or hospital and have medicaid pay for it. Everytime I go into the doctors, I have a thirty to fifty dollar copay. We have had to cut out doctor visits except for true emergencies just because of the additional expense.
Posted by: mccollegemom | Jul 21, 2009 12:17:14 AM
Please give the President a break. I dont know where you people are getting your polls from, but they do not reflect the majority of Americans. He has a tough job to do and you guys keep being critical. Where were you when Bush was burning the country into the ground. He was given a mess to fix and many many people thinks he is doing just fine. He has only been the President for 6 1/2 months. What is wrong with America. Get a life. Give Mr. Obama a chance to make a change.
Posted by: Cassie | Jul 21, 2009 12:18:55 AM
The only people that the US healthcare system is working for are those with insurance (I'm among them). Everyone else is at incredible risk.
Healthcare does NOT belong to "the market". The market works on supply and demand where shortage increases profit.
So now "insurance" companies limit coverage to policy holders in order to increase corporate profit.
It's just the insurance/pharmaceutical lobby that wants this cash cow to continue by portraying the single payer option as "socialized medicine"....it is certainly more social than what we have: Profiteering from People's Suffering..
Posted by: CB | Jul 21, 2009 12:28:00 AM
The complete details of the health care plan hasn't been disclosed to the public.
I really don't understand, how so many can disapprove of this so called "Health care plan". What is the Bill number? What are the details of the plan? When the details are disclosed, I can tell you what I think.....
Posted by: Rosa | Jul 21, 2009 12:37:46 AM
What a shame there wasn't more "Don't Criticize a War President" mentality when Bush was in office. Obama is killing our soldiers & spending huge amounts of money just as Bush did. It was misleading when he touted "bringing home the troops". He didn't bring them home......just sent them to a different country.
Posted by: helen martin | Aug 3, 2009 11:07:07 AM
Post a comment
POLITICAL VIDEOS
THE NOTE BLOG ROLL
- ABC News -- George Stephanopoulos
- ABC News -- Jake Tapper
- ABC News Politics
- ABC News -- The Numbers
- ABC News -- The Blotter
- The American Prospect -- TAPPED
- The Atlantic -- Politics Channel
- The Boston Globe -- Political Intelligence
- Center for American Progress -- Think Progress
- Center for Responsive Politics
- The Chicago Sun-Times -- Lynn Sweet
- The Chicago Tribune -- The Swamp
- Drudge Report
- FactCheck.org
- FiveThirtyEight
- Heritage Foundation -- The Foundry
- The Hill -- Briefing Room
- The Hotline
- The Huffington Post
- The Los Angeles Times -- Top of the Ticket
- NPR -- Political Junkie
- National Review -- The Corner
- The New Republic -- The Plank
- The New York Times -- The Caucus
- Newsweek -- The Gaggle
- Political Wire -- Taegan Goddard
- Politico -- Ben Smith
- Politico -- Mike Allen’s Playbook
- PolitiFact
- Real Clear Politics
- Talking Points Memo
- Time -- The Page
- USA Today -- On Politics
- Variety -- Wilshire & Washington
- The Wall Street Journal -- Capital Journal
- The Washington Post -- The Fix
- The Washington Post -- 44

