The Note
Washington's Original and Most Influential Tipsheet

Rick Klein is ABC News' Senior Political Reporter and author of The Note's morning look at the upcoming day in politics. Throughout the day, ABC News' political team contributes to The Note with the very latest news and analysis from the nation's capital.

To email Rick Klein, click here.

November 2009
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30

« Previous | Main | Next »

GOP Senator Swipes Obama Nuke Diplomacy

September 17, 2009 2:11 PM

Chalian ABC News' David Chalian Reports: 

  President Obama's nuclear diplomacy came under fire today.  Sen. Judd Gregg (R-NH), who was tapped by the president to become Commerce Secretary before withdrawing his nomination, provided a thumbs up to the new missile defense policy announced by the president, but called his handling of the policy shift "a major diplomatic error."

"I guess he didn't really tell the Polish government or the Czech government until late last night and that was really a major diplomatic error," Sen. Gregg said on ABC News' "Top Line."

"You know, we heard about how this administration was going to be so much more adept at handling diplomacy but it turns out in one of the first major diplomatic actions that they've taken they just didn't handle it well at all.  You just don't say to two countries who have stood up and said we're willing to do this, after considerable cajoling from us, that you're going to walk away from them and give them. . . 12 hours notice that you're going to announce this," Gregg said.

"It was not well handled, but I do think from a substance standpoint that it probably makes sense," he added.

Sen. Gregg cited concerns of the expense of the system previously supported by the Bush Administration and the ability for such a missile defense shield to properly meet the Iranian threat.

"The Iranians are a huge problem for us there's no question about that and their movement towards a nuclear weapon is a huge problem for everyone, but whether or not we need to put in place a long range missile defense capability in Eastern Europe I have had serious reservations about," Sen. Gregg told us.

While Sen. Gregg rapped the Obama administration for its handling of the situation, other Republicans are standing in firm opposition to the policy itself.

Sen. McCain (R-AZ) called President Obama's policy shift "seriously misguided" and the Republican National Committee is seeking to paint President Obama as a leader willing to let down our allies in Poland and the Czech Republic.

We also chatted with Sen. Gregg about his opposition to the Baucus health care bill announced yesterday.

Be sure to watch the entire interview with Sen. Gregg HERE:


Politico's Jonathan Martin also stopped by, as he does each Thursday, to give us his take on President Obama's hastily announced policy shift today, the administration's reluctance to be drawn into a race debate, and how Mr. Obama plans to get the 51 votes he needs on health care.  You won't want to miss Martin's analysis.

You can watch the entire interview with Politico's Jonathan Martin HERE:

September 17, 2009 | Permalink | Share | User Comments (6)

User Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Obama is spot on here.... We have proven missile defense systems that can be seabased... No need to set up stationary systems in Poland at the cost of billions and billions more to maintain...

Posted by: Melanie | Sep 17, 2009 2:29:42 PM

Well seeing that President Obama has more Intelligence then W had in his pinky this is a good thing!

Posted by: Angie in PA | Sep 17, 2009 3:02:30 PM

We continue to know if the GOP is making a terrible disagreement over an incident, than that incident must be fair, just and good for the country.

Posted by: gus amaral | Sep 17, 2009 5:55:33 PM

I agree President Obama made the right choice by not setting up the missile defense shield in Eastern Europe.We don't want to cause any more problems with the situation over there and not setting up the shield will protect us in the long run

Posted by: Aziz Jackson | Sep 18, 2009 2:21:26 PM

the point is that by sea-basing the defense we cannot defend against ICBMs or even mid-range missiles effectively. Or, at least, it is harder. But can likely handle what Iran might come up with for now. But that is not Obama's main concern. His main idea is that by sea-based, and by limited batteries on soil, he can effectively "cut and run" if so desired. Obama knows, like the Poles and Czechs know, that if we had actual troops on the ground even Obama would hesitate -at least for a moment- before abandonement of allies or treaties. Without that the US is fickle and look how Obama handles Georgia, the Kurds, etc.

Posted by: Ed | Sep 18, 2009 8:17:47 PM

I guess it all depends on who our enemies are in 20 years. The assumption is that Russia will always be our friend. I sure hope Obama is right. He is betting our country on it. Plus, he can use the money for his give-aways to buy more votes for his party. He will need it as he has many more planned.

Posted by: Lee | Sep 20, 2009 3:20:45 PM

Post a comment