Rick Klein is ABC News' Senior Political Reporter and author of The Note's morning look at the upcoming day in politics. Throughout the day, ABC News' political team contributes to The Note with the very latest news and analysis from the nation's capital.
To email Rick Klein, click here.
RECENT POSTS
- ‘Top Line’ with Sally Quinn -- Inside the First Obama State Dinner
- GOPers to Biden: Stop Using Stimulus Jobs Numbers
- Exit Ramps: Democrats Grow Restless on Afghanistan Strategy
- The Note's Must-Reads for Tuesday, November 24, 2009
- RNC's Communications Chief Resigns
- A Better Palin Than Tina Fey?
- ‘Top Line’ -- ‘America’s Next Great Pundit’
- ‘Top Line’ at the Movies: ‘Outside the Law: Stories from Guantanamo’
- Mass. GOP Gov’s Candidate Chooses Openly Gay Running Mate
- Workplace Diversity: Lines in Sand Make Mess for Dems
THE NOTE CATEGORIES
- 2010
- Afghanistan
- Bill Clinton
- CIA
- Congress
- Democratic party
- Environment
- Financial Reform
- GOP
- Gov. Mark Sanford
- Gov. Sarah Palin
- Guantanamo
- Health Care
- Hillary Clinton
- Immigration
- Iran
- Iraq
- John McCain
- Mitt Romney
- North Korea
- Obama Agenda
- Politics Live
- President Obama
- Republican Party
- Ronald Reagan
- Sen. John Ensign
- Senate
- Sonia Sotomayor
- Stimulus
- Sunday Shows
- Supreme Court
- Ted Kennedy
- The Note
- The Note Must-Reads
- Top Line
- Vice President Biden
- Virginia
MONTHLY ARCHIVES
« Previous | Main | Next »
Sen. Jack Reed: ‘Emerging Consensus' to Deploy More Training Troops in Afghanistan
October 27, 2009 2:28 PM
ABC News’ Rick Klein reports:
With President Obama mulling a new strategy -- and new force levels -- in Afghanistan, a key Senate Democrat said today that he expects the administration to send additional forces to help train Afghan troops, separate from any decision the president makes on combat troops.
"There's an emerging consensus that additional trainers have to be deployed, because the key in the long term to avoid the repetition of this cycle is an Afghani security force that is capable and can provide basic stability," Sen. Jack Reed, D-R.I., said on ABCNews.com's "Top Line" today.
"So that is something I think everyone can see to be increased. The real issue is brigade combat teams, the combat forces. My sense is that -- as has been reported -- the president is looking at several options, including an increase -- I don't know what the number is -- but including an increase to those forces."
The comments by Reed, a senior member of the Senate Armed Services Committee and a former Army ranger, suggest that President Obama will be sending more troops to Afghanistan even if he rejects Gen. Stanley McChrystal's recommendation for additional combat forces.
Senate Armed Services Chairman Carl Levin, D-Mich., has endorsed the concept of sending more training troops instead of boosting the number of US combat troops.
But any move to increase US troop levels in Afghanistan is likely to provoke strong opposition from some Democrats in Congress. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., has said she doesn't detect "a great deal of support for sending more troops to Afghanistan" in Congress.
Reed also said that Matthew Hoh's resignation in protest over Afghanistan policy got his attention.
Hoh last month left his post as the senior US civilian in Zabul province, writing that he had "lost understanding of and confidence in the strategic purposes of the United States' presence in Afghanistan."
"I think it underscores the need for evaluation of what's been done there unfortunately," Reed said. "And I've been over to the country on a number of occasions. You know, four or five years ago it was a much different place in terms of security, in terms of potential, in terms of what we could have done. But now, I think through the wrong-headed approach to Iraq by the Bush administration, we're now in a situation in Afghanistan that's much more complicated. The Taliban has re-formed. There is growing frustration by the people, not only with their government, but also with the fact that we haven't produced the immediate benefits that they assume."
"So I think it just reflects a great deal of frustration, but also underscores the need to step back and analyze our policy and our strategy."
On health care, Reed applauded the decision by Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., to include a public option in the health care bill that will come to the Senate floor -- even if that means not a single Republican will support the measure.
"I think the important issue is to try and do it right," Reed said. "If we can get a bill through simply for the sake of being bipartisan, that doesn't work. That's not going to help the country -- nor, particularly, our caucus. I think we have to do it right. I think the public option is a right thing to do."
Though the provision Reid is backing in the Senate bill isn't the "robust" public option many liberals are calling for, Reed said he thinks the plan -- which would give states the opportunity to "opt out" of a public option -- would do enough.
"I think it does enough," Reed said. "I think with a public option, you will have an opportunity for people to go and to find health care and to do it in a way in which they will not be sort of unfairly dealt with."
Click HERE to see the full interview with Sen. Jack Reed.
We also checked in with Republican strategist Kevin Madden, on the conservatives' split in the race in an upstate New York House district, plus the latest on health care reform.
Click HERE to see that portion of today's program.
October 27, 2009 in Health Care, President Obama, Senate | Permalink | Share | User Comments (2)
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
"she doesn't detect "a great deal of support for sending more troops to Afghanistan" in Congress. "
So after supporting every single request Bush ever made for military adventures, Congress is suddenly going to cut off the Democratic administration at the knees? Not likely. There will be a handful of no votes to represent the far left, but if Obama presents a comprehensive strategy that include a real exit plan (my guess of what is taking so much time to get lined up), Congress will go along.
Posted by: jhw539 | Oct 27, 2009 3:06:29 PM
Not likely. There will be a handful of no votes to represent the far left, but if Obama presents a comprehensive strategy that include a real exit plan (my guess of what is taking so much time to get lined up), Congress will go along.
Posted by: Extenze | Nov 11, 2009 9:13:07 AM
Post a comment
POLITICAL VIDEOS
THE NOTE BLOG ROLL
- ABC News -- George Stephanopoulos
- ABC News -- Jake Tapper
- ABC News Politics
- ABC News -- The Numbers
- ABC News -- The Blotter
- The American Prospect -- TAPPED
- The Atlantic -- Politics Channel
- The Boston Globe -- Political Intelligence
- Center for American Progress -- Think Progress
- Center for Responsive Politics
- The Chicago Sun-Times -- Lynn Sweet
- The Chicago Tribune -- The Swamp
- Drudge Report
- FactCheck.org
- FiveThirtyEight
- Heritage Foundation -- The Foundry
- The Hill -- Briefing Room
- The Hotline
- The Huffington Post
- The Los Angeles Times -- Top of the Ticket
- NPR -- Political Junkie
- National Review -- The Corner
- The New Republic -- The Plank
- The New York Times -- The Caucus
- Newsweek -- The Gaggle
- Political Wire -- Taegan Goddard
- Politico -- Ben Smith
- Politico -- Mike Allen’s Playbook
- PolitiFact
- Real Clear Politics
- Talking Points Memo
- Time -- The Page
- USA Today -- On Politics
- Variety -- Wilshire & Washington
- The Wall Street Journal -- Capital Journal
- The Washington Post -- The Fix
- The Washington Post -- 44

