Rick Klein is ABC News' Senior Political Reporter and author of The Note's morning look at the upcoming day in politics. Throughout the day, ABC News' political team contributes to The Note with the very latest news and analysis from the nation's capital.
To email Rick Klein, click here.
RECENT POSTS
- The Note's Must-Reads for Thursday, November 26, 2009
- Palin to Headline 'TEA Party Convention'
- GOP Strategist Predicts "Purity Test" Resolution Fails at RNC
- Democrats Divide on War Tax
- Gibbs: Obama to Emphasize Exit Strategy
- Price Tags: Costs Rise for Obama on Afghanistan
- The Note's Must-Reads for Wednesday, November 25, 2009
- ‘Top Line’ with Sally Quinn -- Inside the First Obama State Dinner
- GOPers to Biden: Stop Using Stimulus Jobs Numbers
- Exit Ramps: Democrats Grow Restless on Afghanistan Strategy
THE NOTE CATEGORIES
- 2010
- Afghanistan
- Bill Clinton
- CIA
- Congress
- Democratic party
- Environment
- Financial Reform
- GOP
- Gov. Mark Sanford
- Gov. Sarah Palin
- Guantanamo
- Health Care
- Hillary Clinton
- Immigration
- Iran
- Iraq
- John McCain
- Mitt Romney
- North Korea
- Obama Agenda
- Politics Live
- President Obama
- Republican Party
- Ronald Reagan
- Sen. John Ensign
- Senate
- Sonia Sotomayor
- Stimulus
- Sunday Shows
- Supreme Court
- Ted Kennedy
- The Note
- The Note Must-Reads
- Top Line
- Vice President Biden
- Virginia
MONTHLY ARCHIVES
« Previous | Main | Next »
Abortion Rights Group to Launch TV Ad Fighting Stupak Restrictions
November 16, 2009 2:33 PM
ABC News' Teddy Davis reports:
Watch the ad HERE.
The ad, which is presented as a stand-up comedy routine, is paid for by the Center For Reproductive Rights. It is slated to air on cable networks in the Washington, DC, market and on Internet news sites starting Tuesday.
On Nov. 7, the House of Representatives voted 240-to-194 to approve an amendment offered by Rep. Bart Stupak, D.-Mich., which would prohibit subsidies from being used for any health insurance plan that includes an elective abortion service.
Now that the health-care debate is turning to the Senate, abortion rights groups are hoping that Stupak's tight abortion restrictions do not get included in the bill which ultimately ends up on President Obama's desk.
Abortion rights advocates worry that the Stupak amendment would result in millions of women who currently have an abortion service under their health-care plan losing that coverage once they begin qualifying for income-based subsidies.
When making the case for the Stupak restrictions, abortion rights opponents often note that the Federal Employees Health Benefits Plan does not include coverage of abortion.
The Center for Reproductive Rights is pushing back on the notion that subsidized private insurance should follow the FEHBP model by circulating a statement from D.J. Feldman, a federal employee denied insurance coverage after a termination of a anencephalic fetus.
Feldman said the denial of abortion coverage surprised and shocked her.
"That's when I learned just how punishing, invasive, and painful federal policy is when it comes to women's lives. A decision that should have been left between me and my doctor was made instead by politicians," said Feldman in a statement circulated by the Center for Reproductive Rights.
AD TEXT:
"So I think laughter is the best medicine."
"That's because I can't afford health insurance."
"I wrote a health-care reform joke. Do you want to hear it?"
"A woman walks into a doctor's office and says: Doc, my back is killing me, does my insurance cover a breast reduction? The Doctor says, "Yes it does.""
"A man walks into his doctor's office and says: Doc, I've got trouble breathing out of this side of my nose. Does my insurance cover a nose job? The doctor says: "Yes, it does.""
"A woman walks into her doctor's office and says: "Doc, I'm 11 weeks pregnant – my baby has anencephaly, which means parts of her skull and brain are literally missing. It's fatal. Does my insurance cover an abortion? The doctor says: "No it does not.""
"Anencephaly is fatal."
"Don't let Congress ban abortion coverage millions already have."
##
November 16, 2009 | Permalink | Share | User Comments (23)
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
One wonders; "What effect will knowledge that the Republican National Committee's ("RNC") Health Care Plan (with CIGNA) COVERED ELECTIVE ABORTION Over the LAST 18 YEARS???"
Posted by: bobj72 | Nov 16, 2009 2:54:41 PM
The content of the ad is quite good...but presenting it as part of a stand up routine?
More than "tacky"....plain bad taste, and likely ineffective.
Posted by: Coloradem | Nov 16, 2009 3:16:58 PM
This ammendment is only for government subsidised plans using tax payers money will not be allowed. Whats the big deal you should pay for your own abortion why should tax payers pay for your five minutes of irresponsible behavior. If you choose to take a life you should pay for it yourself.
Posted by: Jessica | Nov 16, 2009 3:35:11 PM
How many times does this condition exist and, since it seems to be very, very rare, it's manipulative to use as an example.
But...to bring it up during a stand up comedy routine is idiotic and totally inappropriate.
Posted by: Judy | Nov 16, 2009 4:11:14 PM
I gotta love people who believe the Stupak Amendment will prevent publicly funded abortions. Being pregnant is a pre-existing condition. Being Mexican or any other form of non-citizen is a pre-existing condition. If you can't be denied coverage for pre-existing conditions in this Bill, then we will still be paying for illegal aliens and abortions under this or some other loop hole. The constitution says you have a right to LIFE not reproductive choice. Stop spending your money trying to get something the Congress is already giving you at our expense. The wasted ad revenues could probably pay for my cancer treatments.
Posted by: NewJerseyVet | Nov 16, 2009 4:40:40 PM
Stupak and his christian followers including my Gov. Mark Sanford (R-SC) who Stupak counseled in marriage but FAILED continue to attack a woman's right to her own body. Stupak and Sanford both make me ill! I am sick of these christians who want to legislate morality especially thiers but they don't want it to apply to them!
Posted by: john copeland | Nov 16, 2009 5:40:09 PM
Whoever dreamed up this ad, should be fired. Whatever your views are, to present this as part of some kind of stand-up comedy routine is asinine. This condition occurs in approximately 0.0006% (1 in 175,000) births.
Posted by: jakechadwick | Nov 16, 2009 6:44:52 PM
They are shameful! Some of these women's groups are an embaressment to women everywhere. As a woman, I find them completely offensive and they do not, I repeat, DO NOT represent all women.
Posted by: Karen | Nov 16, 2009 7:06:23 PM
John Copeland, if a baby is part of its mother's body, could you explain to me why my brother is a boy? If my brother were part of my mom's body, wouldn't he be a girl? In that case wouldn't all babies be girls?? If a baby is part of its mother's body just because it spends its first few months inside her, then I must be part of my office building because I spend part of my life inside of IT. Now, I need to determine if I'm a stairway or a carpet. What do you think?
Posted by: ninek | Nov 16, 2009 7:23:45 PM
Someone skipped Biology 101
Posted by: d | Nov 16, 2009 8:07:46 PM
"A woman walks into her doctor's office and says: "Doc, I'm 11 weeks pregnant – my baby has anencephaly, which means parts of her skull and brain are literally missing. It's fatal. Does my insurance cover an abortion? The doctor says: "No it does not.""*****WHY does she have to tell her doctor that she is 11 weeks pregnant and "her baby" has anencephaly? And then have to further explain to the doctor what the condition anencephaly means? I would change doctors.
Posted by: d | Nov 16, 2009 8:14:55 PM
Why can't we just have health savings accounts and pay for it ourselves? Why should taxpayers pay for abortions, or pay for pregnancy coverage in their own life insurance...when they are post menopausal, seniors, or ARE MEN!!!
This whole health care takeover has a way of turning common sense on it's head...
There are PLENTY of solutions out there if Government could let adults decide for themselves what is best for them...
Posted by: jafo | Nov 16, 2009 8:28:47 PM
NewJerseyVet...the ammendment does not deny a woman's right to do anything...it simply says that the tax payer isn't going to pay for it via a government offered plan. I don't see what the problem is.
Also, based on this ad, even if they were successful Anencephaly would/should just be added as an exception like the exceptions already there for rape, incest, risk to the mother rather than the whole ammendment being thrown out (as this group is clearly looking to have done).
Posted by: Idunno | Nov 16, 2009 9:02:01 PM
So now it's considered to be a baby? I thought it was just a blob of tissue at 11 weeks??? That's what we're told over and over again by pro-choice activists. If it's just a blob, then how do you know that he/she is missing part of his/her skull and brain??? Hmmmmmmmmmm,greedy, money-hungry liars-that is what the abortion industry is made up of.
Posted by: Rebekah | Nov 16, 2009 9:07:54 PM
Again, the 'debate' is so one sided.
No pro life ad would be aired. They were rejected by ABC, CBC, NBC, ect.
In the name of fairness, air both sides of the debate, or none of it.
I LOVE how some still frame this as 'rights'.
HELLO. It's 100% legal to abort a baby, period. Doesn't matter how far along the pregnancy is.
Is there now some Constitutional right to make others pay for abortion?
Is that the snake oil the abortion lobby is trying to sell?
It's all about the money. Planned Parenthood wants more tax dollars.
Please, please, be smart enough to see through this.
I have so little hope.
Look how many couldn't see through Obama!
Posted by: MisElaineous | Nov 16, 2009 11:46:57 PM
we pay for wars,wars that plenty of people did not want, did not think we needed and we were right. Our money, my tax money, was used to kill hundreds of thousand of people in a war I never wanted that I thought was a sin. But republicans never had a problem blowing billions in mass murder attacking a country that was of those threat to us killing thousands along the way. Yup. soooo 'prolife', huh? Baloney.
Posted by: bull | Nov 17, 2009 1:08:15 AM
Hey Doc, my new born has anencephaly.
"Does my insurance cover this...Can you murder him for me?"
This is the exact same question as far as I'm concerned.
Posted by: EricC | Nov 17, 2009 1:16:10 AM
A defenseless stance in a tasteless video - a perfect match! Go ahead and run this and see the national "needle" swing even further towards the protection of unborn babies.
Posted by: Goforit | Nov 17, 2009 1:48:21 AM
If waterboarding is torture,
what is abortion?
Posted by: Joe Hanson | Nov 17, 2009 1:48:59 AM
There are PLENTY of solutions out there if Government could let adults decide for themselves what is best for them...
Posted by: jafo |
_______________________________________
You mean like adults deciding that they would like to have a LEGAL abortion?
Posted by: dk | Nov 17, 2009 3:24:13 AM
Post a comment
POLITICAL VIDEOS
THE NOTE BLOG ROLL
- ABC News -- George Stephanopoulos
- ABC News -- Jake Tapper
- ABC News Politics
- ABC News -- The Numbers
- ABC News -- The Blotter
- The American Prospect -- TAPPED
- The Atlantic -- Politics Channel
- The Boston Globe -- Political Intelligence
- Center for American Progress -- Think Progress
- Center for Responsive Politics
- The Chicago Sun-Times -- Lynn Sweet
- The Chicago Tribune -- The Swamp
- Drudge Report
- FactCheck.org
- FiveThirtyEight
- Heritage Foundation -- The Foundry
- The Hill -- Briefing Room
- The Hotline
- The Huffington Post
- The Los Angeles Times -- Top of the Ticket
- NPR -- Political Junkie
- National Review -- The Corner
- The New Republic -- The Plank
- The New York Times -- The Caucus
- Newsweek -- The Gaggle
- Political Wire -- Taegan Goddard
- Politico -- Ben Smith
- Politico -- Mike Allen’s Playbook
- PolitiFact
- Real Clear Politics
- Talking Points Memo
- Time -- The Page
- USA Today -- On Politics
- Variety -- Wilshire & Washington
- The Wall Street Journal -- Capital Journal
- The Washington Post -- The Fix
- The Washington Post -- 44

