The Numbers

A Run at the Latest Data from ABC's Poobah of Polling, Gary Langer

Gary Langer is director of polling at ABC News, where he's covered the beat of public opinion for more than 15 years – conducting and analyzing ABC News polls, evaluating data from other sources and setting the news division's standards for poll reporting. He's the first and only pollster to win a News Emmy, for his second national survey of public opinion in Iraq.

FAVORITES

July 2008
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31    

« Robertson and Rudy: Does it Matter? | Main | Thompson and the NRLC »

Swinging Singles?

November 12, 2007 11:55 AM

It’s the latest group du jour – the population group that’s said to hold the keys to the next election. In past years soccer moms have been paraded by, along with NASCAR dads, security moms and a rumba line of others. At the moment it’s single women, supposedly prowling around for the perfect candidate like a political alter-ego of Carrie Bradshaw on “Sex and the City.”

Peer a bit more closely though, and the view from behind that Cosmopolitan glass might look a little different.

The first thing to know is that “single women” look less like the cast of “Sex” than they look like the supermarket checkout line. All types of unmarried women fall into the category; nearly half of single women are divorced or widowed. Their median age is 48.

Nor are single women a swing group. Within the Democratic Party, Hillary Clinton’s support for the nomination is essentially identical among married and unmarried women alike, 55 and 51 percent, respectively. (Clinton also leads for the nomination among Democratic men in the latest national ABC/Post poll, albeit by less of a margin.)

In a general election contest, single women continue to hold the role of core Democrats. In a match-up against Rudy Giuliani, single women favor Clinton by a 2-1 margin, 65-30 percent. That’s similar to what it was for John Kerry in 2004, Al Gore in 2000 and Bill Clinton in 1996 and 1992. A swing voter group is one whose majority allegiance shifts from party to party in presidential elections. Single women clearly don’t fit the bill.

Abc_chart_01_071112_3 

Abc_chart_02_071112_2 

A glance at political affiliation underscores that reality. Unmarried women are far more likely than other Americans to identify themselves with the Democratic Party: Two-thirds are Democrats or lean Democratic, dwarfing the party’s advantage in comparable groups. A get-out-the-vote campaign focused on unmarried women necessarily would disproportionately benefit the Democrat in a general election contest. Indeed the activist group “Women’s Voices, Women Vote” identifies unmarried women as “the greatest untapped resources for increasing political support for progressive causes in America.”

Abc_chart_03_071112                            

While unmarried women disproportionately are Democrats, what “progressive” means, or how it applies, is tougher to tell. As a group they are no likelier than other women (or than unmarried men) to support gay civil unions, legal abortion or a legal-status program for illegal immigrants.

In one difference, unmarried women are the only comparable group in which a majority (53 percent) sees “larger government with more services” as preferable to “smaller government with fewer services.” Income and race may be factors; unmarried women, like unmarried men, include more racial minorities and have lower average household incomes, two groups that also tend to prefer a more active government.

We can, by the way, trim this population down to a closer Carrie Bradshaw lookalike – not single or unmarried women, but “never-married” women. It's a yet more solidly Democratic group – no different in primary preferences, but in a general election match-up Clinton's lead over Giuliani advances to 3-1 among never-married women. On other issues never-marrieds look much the same as all unmarried women, with a few differences related to age, notably on gay civil unions and legal status for illegal aliens.

Ultimately, it’s married women who are the more critical political group. They’re much more likely to be true swing voters. George W. Bush won married women by 55-44 percent in 2004, a key element of his re-election victory. (While they were commonly called “security moms” the presence or absence of kids didn’t actually seem to figure into the equation.) Married women split evenly between Gore and Bush in 2000. Clinton won them in 1996, and ran evenly with them against George H.W. Bush in 1992. This is a group whose preference shifts.

In our latest poll, while Clinton sailed away with unmarried women, married women divided between her and Giuliani by a much closer 50-47 percent. It’s where those married women end up – not their single, Cosmopolitan-sipping counterparts – that’s likelier to play a crucial role in 2008.

November 12, 2007 | Permalink | User Comments (3)

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/433071/23272110

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Swinging Singles?:

User Comments

Gary,
The analysis is quite apt. But I think there is something missing here: race.

Single women are diverse but nevertheless disproportionately African American. I wonder how support for the candidates might differ had you first looked only at whites, and then only at blacks. My guess is that among whites, you'll find that the "unmarried gap" is very much reduced not only for the Hillary/Rudy horse race but for 00 and 04 exit polls too. (For a detailed look at the same phenomenon in the 70s and 80s, you can see my paper in the 1991 volume of Public Opinion Quarterly).

Posted by: Eric Plutzer | Nov 12, 2007 1:34:32 PM

Eric Plutzer response to the ABC New analysis of unmarried women raises an interesting question, but also one that can be easily answered. While it is true that the greater racial diversity of unmarried women amplifies their propensity to vote Democratic, but it is also true that marital status transcends other demographic dynamics. According to network exit surveys, white unmarried women supported Kerry 55 – 44 percent over George Bush in 2004 and supported Democrats in the 2006 election by a 16-point margin. We see similar margins looking at other demographic groups, including groups that otherwise trend Republican, such as rural or southern voters.

Moreover, ABC news analysis suggesting that married women may be a more important “swing” target for the parties to fight over also misses an essential point. Demographically, unmarried women are a fast growing population. From 1960 to 2006, the percentage of the voting age population that was unmarried grew from 27 to 45 percent. Between the 2002 and 2006 elections, the growth rate of unmarried Americans was double that of married Americans.

a longer article we wrote about the unmarried cohort. In it, we describe unmarried women as the “Democratic evangelicals.” This appellation reflects both their relative loyalty—they provide similar margin for Democrats as evangelicals provide for Republicans—and their size. As a proportion of the electorate, and potential electorate, unmarried women outnumber every other Democratic base group, including people of color.

Hope you find it interesting.


David
Senior Associate

Posted by: David Walker | Nov 13, 2007 3:28:06 PM

Gary, David,

I am sure there are many factors at play here. However you might consider an alternative view; that there is something deeper going on here that goes beyond the conventional mainstream statistical and demographic approach to cultural and social trends.

Cultural Creatives, a term coined by demographer Paul Ray seeks to explain an emerging demographic trend in thinking that was further fully exposed to the American mainstream in the 60s via the counter-cultural movement.

Ray claims that this is the fastest growing group in the USA and it is reflective of the desire to transcend labeling and grouping people based on superficial measures of difference such as sexuality, race, gender, income, etc.

The key is that a large group of women see this movement which is based on various progressive movements (environmentalism, feminism, new age spirituality, civil rights, etc) as key to real change in our society and their transcending of the male dominated social structure that still controls our mainstream society although more subtly than in the past.

Ray says there are three main demographics in our society:

1. Traditionalists who tend to be labeled as Social and Christian Conservatives.

2. Modernists who are very driven by conventional notions of progress such as economic growth and reflect mainstream secular cultural values as put forward by the media and the dominant institutions of society.

3. Cultural Creatives who tend to seek alternative perspectives on what is going on in the world. In particular they have serious concerns about the sustainability of the existing American Dream which tends to focus on material measures of success.

The growth in green business and socially conscious living is tied to this movement. Cultural Creatives seem to be more conscious about their position in society as a grouping than any of the other groups. They take pride in their ability to take a critical non-conventional view to politics and society. They also believe that this approach is vital to the continuation of American and even global democracy which they believe is under severe stress at this time due to the reliance that liberal democratic societies have on an extremely unsustainable socioeconomic model. Finally, Cultural Creatives have a very holistic way of seeing the problems of contemporary society - as well as the potential solutions.

Yet If I did a search of this blog, I doubt if I would find one word about it. I think these omissions may help explain why the mainstream media has not been able to provide the public with insightful information about what is really going on in the world. As with the war in Iraq, it is often too late when the mainstream realizes the facts that are needed for people to make informed decisions.

Cultural Creatives are very skeptical about how the mainstream operates as well as the quality of its content. They believe that the corporate control of the mainstream media, leads to a very incomplete and homogenized view of the world on the part of mainstream Americans.

Specifically here is the case that women are disproportionately represented and are taking leadership positions among Cultural Creatives. Given the evidence you presented above, this may be a possible factor causing unmarried young women to lean towards the Democrats.

Why?

1. Marriage makes people more conservative and the age factor. Traditionally it’s been a key factor in determining people's views.

2. Women are the largest historically exploited group with 50% of the potential group - much larger than blacks, Hispanics or homosexuals and they tend to be more distrustful of the established social structures than men who historically have dominated the establishment.

3. Marriage tends to be a factor that drives the shift towards more practical considerations such as raising a child, buying a house and considering conventional social mores. Thus married women are more susceptible to pressures to think more conservatively about the world. This is especially the case when such considerations improve their social status in the community and among their familial, professional and social networks.

Jeff

Posted by: Jeff Buderer | Nov 20, 2007 7:13:09 AM

Post a comment