The Numbers

A Run at the Latest Data from ABC's Poobah of Polling, Gary Langer

Gary Langer is director of polling at ABC News, where he's covered the beat of public opinion for nearly 20 years - conducting and analyzing ABC News polls, evaluating data from other sources and setting the news division's standards for poll reporting. Langer is a two-time Emmy award winner, both for ABC's reporting of public opinion polls in Iraq.

FAVORITES

December 2008
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31      

« Previous | Main | Next »

So Who the Heck's Ahead?

December 30, 2007 11:37 AM

Romney's ahead. Huckabee's ahead. Romney… Huckabee… Clinton, no, it's Edwards. Wait – Obama. No, it's…

This is where fascination with the horse race, particularly in a low-turnout caucus, will get you: tied up in knots. We want a single number and simple characterization. It doesn’t exist. What we have are different polls done different ways, many of them overanalyzed to make something out of very little, in fluid and close races.

Six Iowa polls of very varying quality have been completed and released in the last four days. One has Romney ahead of Huckabee; two have Huckabee ahead or slightly ahead of Romney. Then there's a Romney +4, a Huckabee +2 and a Huckabee +1, all within sampling error. These polls put Huckabee's support anywhere from 23 to 36 percent; Romney's, in a closer band, 27 to 32 percent.

In the Democratic race, three of these polls have Clinton ahead or slightly ahead; the others show various flavors of dead heats. Clinton's support ranges from 23 to 31 percent, depending on the poll; Obama's, 22 to 30; Edwards', 24 to 29.

Part of all this can be people moving as they make final decisions. But it's at least as likely to reflect the vagaries of pollsters' efforts to identify and interview likely voters, and quantify their preferences, during a holiday week, in such a low-participation contest. It's wise to take into account the quality of the effort (we've checked them all, and internally we advise which of these polls are best done, which so-so and which don't past muster methodologically). But given all the variables, even good (and so-so) ones differ.

Good polls have set the table: We know the leading candidates, and we know the issues, concerns and characteristics that animate the contest. Late-stage polling can be a warning sign of anything transformational. But beyond that, for the sake of your own sanity, try to avoid getting sucked into the horse-race clutter. Given available data, these contests are best simply characterized as close.

(For more, see also my Outlook piece with Jon Cohen in in today's Washington Post.)

December 30, 2007 | Permalink | User Comments (4)

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/433071/24629302

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference So Who the Heck's Ahead?:

User Comments

Perhaps our great nation has finally grown weary of yesterday's meaningless alter of war in which our children's blood continues to be sacrificed today for ego. This will explain in part my previous comment concerning a highly probable future in which a single candidate best represents a future born of necessity rather than conflict.

Can we recall any such hero as less or more than the relative man of dignity?

-Aaron C. Donahue

Posted by: Aaron C. Donahue | Dec 31, 2007 11:52:53 AM

Well the one you've ignored has won more straw polls, raised more money, especially from veterans and in my opinion and many others is the last hope to bring America back from bankruptcy, Ron Paul!
Funny, I don't see an ABC online poll for the candidates? Gee, I guess you can't exclude Ron Paul supporters from those though could you and that wouldn't be fair to the candidates that YOU want to win!

Posted by: Russell Snow | Jan 3, 2008 8:17:28 AM

Democrat- Democrats are women, blind women.
Republicans are Women and Men who are strong.

Posted by: STALKER CLEAR SKY | Jan 9, 2008 4:56:03 PM

A self avowed MARXIST will not get my vote!

Posted by: Rod Woods | Jan 23, 2008 7:09:09 AM

Post a comment