The Numbers
A Run at the Latest Data from ABC's Poobah of Polling, Gary Langer
Gary Langer is director of polling at ABC News, where he's covered the beat of public opinion for nearly 20 years - conducting and analyzing ABC News polls, evaluating data from other sources and setting the news division's standards for poll reporting. Langer has won two Emmy awards for ABC's reporting of public opinion polls in Iraq, and The Numbers blog was honored this year as winner of the 2008 Iowa Gallup Award for Excellent Journalism Using Polls.
ARCHIVES
SUBJECT INDEX
RECENT POSTS
- In Afghanistan Decision, Risks Abound
- Views on the Terror Trials
- Sarah Palin: Rogue for President?
- Chasing Feathers
- Tomorrow's Elections: An Obama Referendum?
- Schwarzenegger's Nastygram: One in 10 Billion?
- Executive Pay? Cut Away
- Pols, Polls and Pushback
- On Nuclear Iran, Diplomacy and Sanctions are Preferred to Hostilities
- Polling, Politics and Nobels
MONTHLY ARCHIVES
« Previous | Main | Next »
Guns and the Court
June 26, 2008 8:57 AM
Most Americans long have supported handgun ownership, and a big majority believes the Constitution allows citizens – not just militias – to possess firearms.
That sentence might be slightly at odds with other things you’ve heard about public attitudes about gun control – specifically, that most Americans favor stricter gun control laws. This, too, is true. What matters is the nature of the gun control that’s proposed.
All this, of course, is pertinent to today’s Supreme Court ruling rejecting the Washington D.C. gun law, which banned handguns and required that other guns be kept unloaded and either fitted with trigger locks or dismantled.
First, a frame of reference: Per our most recent ABC/Post poll, 42 percent of Americans have a gun in the household, a number that’s been stable in recent years. Twenty-five percent have a handgun at home, 23 percent a shotgun, 27 percent a rifle. (Many of course have multiples of these.) So while most Americans don’t have a gun – lots do.
Now, basic attitudes. Specific to the D.C. case, The Washington Post asked this in March, using an old ABC/Post question: "The Second Amendment to the United States Constitution reads as follows: 'A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.' In your opinion does this guarantee only the right of the states to maintain militias, or also the right of individuals to own guns?"
Result:
The Second Amendment…
Guarantees individual rights to own guns 72%
Only guarantees state rights to form militias 20%
This view has been consistent: Gallup got the same result in a similar question in February, and it’s the same as when we first asked it in 2002.
The Post also had asked whether people support a law "that bans private handgun ownership and requires that rifles and shotguns... be unloaded or have a trigger lock." It found 59 percent support. However, we know from other polls that when these have been measured separately, mandatory trigger locks have been very popular, while banning handguns has not.
Consider an ABC News poll on the subject last year: Six in 10 favored "stricter gun control laws." But just 38 percent favored banning the sale of handguns, and 42 percent favored a ban on carrying concealed weapons. By contrast, 67 percent favored banning assault weapons and 55 percent favored banning semi-automatic handguns. In previous ABC/Post polling, support has been broader still for mandatory registration and licensing for handgun owners, background checks and trigger locks. And after the Virginia Tech shootings, eight in 10 backed a national registry meant to keep guns out of the hands of the mentally ill.
Views of the Second Amendment are one factor informing attitudes on gun control; there are others. One is some skepticism about whether legislation would do the job; while six in 10 support stricter gun laws in general, fewer, 49 percent, think such laws in fact would reduce gun violence. Instead better enforcement is preferred to new legislation, by 52 to 29 percent.
And perhaps most fundamentally, far more people blame gun violence on the influences of upbringing and culture than on access to firearms. In our 2007 poll, 40 percent blamed "the influence of popular culture" as the main cause of gun violence, and 35 percent pointed to "the way parents raise their children." Just 18 percent pinned it primarily on the availability of guns.
Politics
In terms of the politics of the issue, majority agreement that the Second Amendment guarantees individual rights to gun ownership crosses the political spectrum: 83 percent of Republicans, 76 percent of independents and 67 percent of Democrats in the WaPo data. But attitudes on some other gun control issues are more highly partisan. Support for "stricter gun control" in general ranges from 77 percent of Democrats to 58 percent of independents and down to 46 percent of Republicans.
Nonetheless majorities of Democrats and independents alike oppose banning handguns (53 and 54 percent, respectively); this jumps to 73 percent among Republicans.
Democrats are much more likely than others to think stricter gun control would reduce violent crime - 67 percent say so, vs. 47 percent of independents and 33 percent of Republicans. But even Democrats only divide on whether new laws, or better enforcement of existing laws, would do more to achieve that goal. Independents, and more so Republicans, are more apt to favor better enforcement of current laws.
Relatively few in any of these groups cite the availability of guns as the chief cause of gun violence - just under a quarter of Democrats and independents alike, and 6 percent of Republicans.
A final result shows that gun control is more apt to be a voting issue for people who oppose it. Among Americans who support gun control, 66 percent say they could vote for a candidate who disagrees with them on the issue. Among those who oppose gun control, fewer, 49 percent, say the same.
June 26, 2008 in Social Issues | Permalink | User Comments (28)
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
of course,upbringing and environmental factors greatly influence the alarming homicide rate in this country.But so does the access to handguns.
Posted by: peter king | Jun 28, 2008 12:46:30 AM
The Brits seem to forget why they were never allowed to own guns. Mostly had to do with controlling the serfs & the ancient system of property ownership & the monarchy. Love the system of gov't. Think it might be useful in the USA. But,as we are now, I don't want to be deprived of my right to protect myself from criminals or from an out of control gov't. Take away the guns, & it is much easier to create a Zimbabwe style dictatorship. Individual ownership does impose 2nd thoughts on all those bad guys.
Posted by: sande | Jun 28, 2008 12:59:47 AM
One man can control a hundred people with a gun, but if just ten of those one hundred people had a gun... well you get the picture.
Posted by: Danny | Jun 28, 2008 3:18:54 AM
Just another thought: you can take away guns from the good guys, but the bad guys would still find a way to possess them (black market, smuggling, etc) pretty much making us good guys sitting ducks!
Posted by: Danny | Jun 28, 2008 3:27:44 AM
Lawrence: remember remember the 5th of november the gun powder treason and plot, I see there no reason the gun power treason should ever be forgot. Ring any bells?? People shouldnt be afraid of there government, governments should be afraid of there people. Guy Fox said it and by the way I disagree with you on the assault wepons thing I think there are some people that shouldnt own them or any other gun for that matter as they are more likely to shoot themselves than anything but I do own an MP5SD6 and I train on it 3 times a week more if I can get away with it and I feel pretty safe in my home knowing I can use it. I am ofcourse a member of the military and am very careful and very well trained though I do keep up with such things on my own point is its a freedom gun ownership and with every freedom must come responsibility you want to own a gun great you must qualify with it learn deadly force rules keep it secure and above all have commen sence.
Posted by: Mike Jenkins | Jun 28, 2008 6:12:03 PM
Hi ,
Thanks for posting new updates on the - Gun Control Laws .
I 've also read the comments , and i am agree with the - Jim , comments .
Thanks.
With best wishes ,
Lorra .
Posted by: Lorra | Jul 17, 2008 4:11:18 PM
And just where do these anti gun people think the militias come from? Armed citizens, that's where. A state would have a hard time grouping up a militia if the free citizens didn't have guns in the first place.
The liberal party has never yet stated the exact reason they want to disarm the citizens and convert them to subjects.
Any gun could be labeled an "assault weapon". This is a liberal invented term to sound ominous and frightful to the general non gun owning public.
Posted by: William Creel | Apr 30, 2009 11:30:20 AM
"the federal government already requires an instant background check to purchase any long gun. at a gun shop, gun show, or a private sale between friends."
This is not true as pertaining to private individual sales. Maybe a few states are that backwards, but I can buy from a stranger, a neighbor or a relative and it's legal. There are those individuals that take their guns to a gun show to sale. How could one ask for more prospective buyers than a crowd at a gun show!
Posted by: William Creel | Apr 30, 2009 1:25:49 PM
Post a comment
