The Numbers

A Run at the Latest Data from ABC's Poobah of Polling, Gary Langer

Gary Langer is director of polling at ABC News, where he's covered the beat of public opinion for nearly 20 years - conducting and analyzing ABC News polls, evaluating data from other sources and setting the news division's standards for poll reporting. Langer is a two-time Emmy award winner, both for ABC's reporting of public opinion polls in Iraq.

ARCHIVES

FAVORITES

July 2009
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  

« Previous | Main | Next »

State of Play: Obama

August 05, 2008 1:19 PM

A poll late last week noted no immediate change in views of Barack Obama’s foreign policy skills as a result of his trip abroad. That was reassuring, because it fits with the best construct of how public opinion works.

We too often expect knee-jerk reactions to events of the day; rarely, in fact, do we see them. With few exceptions public opinion proceeds, instead, by a process known as considered judgment: People obtain information as it develops, evaluate it, let it accumulate to the point that it warrants reconsideration of existing attitudes, and at that point re-evaluate and either maintain or change their views.

Attitudes, this means, are far less flighty or reactive to individual events than is commonly assumed; for the most part they are, actually, rational. Obama's trip, like everything else he's doing – and ditto for John McCain – are therefore about building a case, not about changing daily numbers (which, at this stage, are fundamentally silly).

Rather than watch for coughs and hiccups in the data, we can reach a better understanding of Obama’s side of the contest by drawing together key threads we’ve collected over time. A summary follows; I’ll together pull a similar summary on McCain soon.

As we suggested in one of our poll analyses earlier this summer, the chief puzzler of Obama’s candidacy is why, given his broad advantage on a range of domestic issues and the Republicans’ various weaknesses, he isn’t doing better against McCain than he is. The main answer is his relative inexperience - and it’s a major challenge.

Here’s one telling result: Forty-six percent of Americans said Obama does not have the kind of experience it takes to serve effectively as president. (Fifty percent said he does). That is an awful lot of people to lose on a question of basic qualifications for office.

Relatedly, 46 percent characterized Obama as a “risky” choice for president (although nearly as many, 42 percent, said the same about McCain.) And note the interaction: Among people who say Obama’s not experienced enough, three-quarters see him as a risky choice.

Concerns about Obama’s experience are reflected particularly in ratings of his readiness to handle foreign affairs, to serve as commander-in-chief and to deal with the war in Iraq. Just 48 percent see him as a good commander-in-chief, vs. 72 percent for McCain. McCain leads Obama by 63-26 percent as having “better knowledge of world affairs” and by 71-18 percent as having “the better experience to be president.”

Experience is important; even with very broad and deep dissatisfaction with the country’s current situation (the economy, the war, the president’s leadership), Americans divide essentially evenly on which is more important, “strength and experience” (46 percent) or “a new direction and new ideas” (47 percent).

The “new direction/new ideas” theme is part of Obama’s appeal to younger adults. But older voters are less receptive to the idea – and it’s older voters who more reliably turn out. Obama has more than a 2-1 lead over McCain among under 30s. But that drops sharply among older Americans – and that’s why the race is closer once you narrow it to likely voters. A campaign whose chance of victory is based on young voters is a hazardous one; ask John Kerry.

An associated challenge for Obama is the fact that “change,” the theme of his campaign, can be a double-edge sword. Some other attributes – e.g. experience – are flatly positive. “Change,” by contrast, can be for the good or for the bad. Just 47 percent of Americans say Obama has done enough to explain what he means by “change.” And again this goes especially soft among older adults. Fifty-six percent of seniors think he hasn’t done enough to define “change,” and it’s about as high among those 50 and up.

Obama has many other things going for him – significantly, but not only, his advantage on most domestic issues, dissatisfaction with the current administration and a resulting advantage in Democratic Party allegiance. He does better on most personal attributes as well. Seventy-nine percent of Americans see him as an optimist, vs. 54 percent for McCain. Fifty-six percent say he shares their values, vs. 47 percent for McCain. He leads McCain on bringing needed change, on having the better personality and temperament, on having a clearer vision and on empathy for “the problems of people like you.” While 49 percent see him as a flip-flopper, McCain does essentially no better on this measure.

We haven't seen Obama’s race as a major factor; see our analysis from June 22, but in short, while some whites are less apt to vote for him because of his race, others are more apt to vote for him for that reason, and the net is that Obama’s support among whites (also among Hispanics) is typical for a Democratic presidential nominee.

In other much-discussed areas, we also don’t see much impact in mistaken suggestions that Obama's a Muslim, or in views of his wife. We regard his shortfall among working-class whites as somewhat overstressed. (As we've noted, his support from this group, as with whites overall, is about the same as usual for a Democratic presidential candidate, and it’s among upscale whites, rather than their working-class counterparts, that he may have more opportunity.) And on his vice presidential pick, well, of 17 individual items we tested last month for their importance to vote, the candidates' choice of running mates ranked - you guessed it - dead last.

August 5, 2008 | Permalink | User Comments (12)

User Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

I like this article very much. Everybody candidate should be vetted fairly.

Besides foreign policy, I didn't Obama good at anything else, economy? No. Gun policy? No. Debate? No.

One thing he is good at is, how to calculate the number of delegates.

It's like some student in school very good at obtaining high scores in exams. They can analyze the exam style, how not to lose points in every small questions. So, is this student really capable of solving real problem? If he is given a research project, can he do deep investigation and find solution?

Posted by: golfgirlusa | Aug 5, 2008 1:45:10 PM

Obama - change you can count on. Time after time after time!

Posted by: Aston | Aug 5, 2008 1:48:17 PM

Today's Zogby poll: "Obama loses support among his strongest demographic groups."

Even his base is beginning to realize he's a bag of hot air who will promise anything to snag a vote. No character, no substance, no meaningful experience. Just hollow hype!


Posted by: Truman | Aug 5, 2008 2:03:33 PM

i really dont see how mccain is more knowledgeable about foreign affairs with his numerous gaffes about the world and foreign policies

as for economy obama far outweighs mccain, even mccain admits he has no idea about the economy... and his lack of policies can attest to this...

gun policy... uh... what?

and i cant wait for the debates, because if you think obama is a bad debater, mccain is going to BLOW YOUR MIND

lol

Posted by: bhrandon | Aug 5, 2008 2:06:45 PM

John McCain's best days are behind him.

What is McCain's real health problems is it good or bad?

Posted by: Lookup | Aug 5, 2008 2:21:10 PM


Meanwhile, Obama refuses a debate where questions are asked by real people about real issues. What a coward!


Posted by: Truman | Aug 5, 2008 2:29:30 PM

Obama said in 2004 that he wouldn't run for president because he wouldn't have the experience and wouldn't be ready for the job.

Obama - for once we believe you.

Posted by: Jo | Aug 5, 2008 2:29:35 PM

All of these polls about Senator Obama having little experience and not ready for commander and chief and to lead is just complete nonsense.Senator can lead this country no matter what the polls or anyone says. Just because John McCain was a soldier doesn't mean he can lead a nation either. Senator Obama in my judgement has a better sense of the issues and will lead this country back to the respect and trust this country needs when he becomes President.

Posted by: Aziz Jackson | Aug 5, 2008 2:50:46 PM

All the media seems to be a one trick pony about why Obama is not further ahrad when even the republics privately will say that he is losing 5 - 7 % because of his race. Why is the war hero, senator of 26 years, and maverick not arther ahead?

Obama will when despite the odds - we wont let him lose or the Dems to the party the WIllie Horton ads who cleary are playing the suttle race card. Give us a break - All closed eyes aint sleep........

Posted by: f4skyhawk | Aug 10, 2008 2:02:26 PM

It took BHO over 72 hours to come around to McCain's position on Georgia. BHO is coming around to McCain's position on offshore drilling. BHO is copying McCain's positions on one topic after another.

When it comes to race, why does BHO state it sure would be great, it sure would be historic to elect the first BLACK president? Why does BHO keep repeating the Repubs are going to attack me because I don't LOOK like other presidents before me? Why do 90+ percent of black voters go for BHO when most don't have a clue or care what his policies are? Could it be because of his race? Isn't BHO playing the race card every chance he gets?

Posted by: Davei n lv | Aug 14, 2008 12:49:44 PM

The real risk for America is McBush, he will continue four years of failled WBush-Cheney policies and will further isolate America in the world and accelerate its economic decline. America needs new direction, not a 26 years of experience in the senate without any success story, any initiative any real changes and no new ideas. God save America from McBush.

Posted by: BKMC | Aug 15, 2008 9:48:36 AM

Well, now that Steven Strang has left a vacancy for a religious endorsement, on the stage at Barack's coronation ceremony, maybe Barack should come and recruit the religious leaders who have always supported him ... and, who Barack has always supported. Pastor Jeremiah Wright ... Father Phleiger ... and the rest of the radicals. But, we know Barack won't do that, because even though that represents who Barack truly is ... it wouldn't help Barack deceive us ... and get him elected. In November, vote for Senator John McCain, a man who truly loves America, with over 40 years of service and sacrafice ... not Obama, an inexperienced, incompetent, empty suit, who is being agressively packaged, promoted, and sold to the American people.

Posted by: Gina | Aug 22, 2008 12:24:20 PM

Post a comment