The World Newser is World News' daily blog. Here, you'll find our staff's thoughts on the day's news and the way we build our broadcast. Plus, we'll share reports from our team of correspondents in the field, as well as producers behind-the-scenes.
RECENT POSTS
- Clem's Chronicles: Jobs/Afghanistan/Health Care Reform/Deficit
- Child Safety: Crib Recall and Other Recently Recalled Kids Products
- You Buying Less This Holiday?
- President Lou Dobbs?
- The Democrats Need LBJ
- Another Vampire Blockbuster? Why?
- Documenting the Planet's Demise -- One Striking Photograph at a Time
- President Obama Answers Questions From Anti-Castro Blogger
- Jim Sciutto: A Tiny Town Salutes Its Fallen
- 10 Reasons the Belgians Hate the British
- Is Swine Flu Ebbing?
- Susan Boyle's First Album Makes Amazon CD Sales History
WORLD NEWSER CATEGORIES
MONTHLY ARCHIVES
« Previous | Main | Next »
Rumsfeld defends Iraq
August 28, 2006 4:09 PM
Pentagon producer Luis Martinez blogs:
When Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld speaks to the convention of Veterans of Foreign Wars tonight he will mount a spirited defense of the War in Iraq as a frontline in the War on Terror. Rumsfeld's comments will echo Vice President Cheney's comments to the same veterans group earlier today. (At left, Rumsfeld in Alaska on Saturday.)
In excerpts from his remarks tonight, Secretary Rumsfeld is critical of what he calls “the lack of perspective” involved in the current domestic debate over the progress War on Terror. A perspective not lost on veterans who've sacrificed so much in "freedom's defense."
He argues the ongoing debate could give "the enemy the false impression that Americans cannot stomach a tough fight. We must work hard to keep a "Blame America First" mentality from undermining our efforts in another long war against a determined enemy."
Rumsfeld will highlight the difficulties of the War on Terror where the US faces “an enemy unlike any we have known. An enemy that has no country to defend, has signed no treaties, and does not honor the conventions or laws of war. As we have seen recently, our enemy is seeking to strike again on a massive scale.”
Rumsfeld's comments indicate a frustration with Islamic terrorists and fighters who constantly lie “and portray our cause as a war on Islam when in fact the overwhelming majority of victims of their terrorism have been thousands and thousands of innocent Muslims -- men, women, and children.” (At right, Rumsfeld inspects interceptor missiles in Alaska on Sunday.)
He adds: “As our forces strive to protect civilians, the enemy uses civilians as shields. As our troops strive to obey the laws of warfare, the enemy uses those laws against us. As our troops are held to a standard of near perfection, the enemy is held to no standard at all. And while some argue for tossing in the towel, the enemy is waiting and hoping for us to do just that.”
Rumsfeld notes that while there’s debate within the United States on whether or not Iraq is a battlefront in the War on Terror, there's no hesitation about Iraq’s status from America's enemies. “The extremists openly call Iraq the 'epicenter' in the War on Terror. And they mean it. Yet even today so many seem to want to argue otherwise.”
He concludes: “The great story of America is instead one of grit, of determination and victory. And that story is still unfolding. Americans didn't cross oceans and settle a wilderness and build history's greatest democracy, only to run away from murderers and extremists who try to kill everyone they cannot convert and try to tear down what they could never build.”
August 28, 2006 | Permalink | Share | User Comments (100)
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
Wadda load of hooey!
We started that war in Iraq, not terrorists. The "insurgents" he so adamantly defines are just the very citizens of a nation we have nearly decimated. Calling Iraq the front on the war on terror is a total misrepresentation of America's goals in dominating mid-east oil. Our policies need to change if we are going to be in good relations with developing nations and those we have exploited for their resources over the past 100 years.
Posted by: JAG | Aug 28, 2006 6:03:06 PM
So Rummy runs in front of a bunch of cheering over-the-hill warhawks to spew pre-BushWar propaganda. Sorry Rummy, your can of beans has expired and the American public smells your plate of crud for what it is. Death by lies.
Posted by: Lrobby99 | Aug 28, 2006 6:04:37 PM
The reason why America's opponents see Iraq as the "epicentre" is that they know that America can't win.
America has never understood "asymetric" warfare.
And while America lose the rest of the world cheers.
America is losing because America deserves to lose.
Posted by: steveh | Aug 28, 2006 6:10:26 PM
Luis, thanks for the cut and paste from the Pentagon.
"..he will mount a spirited defense of the War in Iraq as a frontline in the War on Terror."
Spirited? How do you know? Do you have a time machine? Thanks for the reporting.
Posted by: Redstater | Aug 28, 2006 6:19:21 PM
Well, Rumsfeld should listen to what he is saying, paraphrased "...this is like no other enemy the US has ever faced, no country to defend, no treaties..." Hmmmm, let's see... sounds to me like common criminals these terrorists. And what is the best way to fight criminals (listen Rummy, Bush, Cheney it is not to invade another country that had nothing to do with the attack of 9/11)THAT'S RIGHT - With good police work like our friends in GB did a couple weeks ago (and Bush & Co. took credit for) Now, before the October surprise to scare the nation republican again, bombing Iran will not capture Osama either. The question in most American's minds (mostly the one's who lost loved one's in Iraq)Why is Osama still breathing??????????????
Posted by: John Mooseles | Aug 28, 2006 6:24:01 PM
This guy needs professional help, he is a lost cause.
Posted by: Elliot Donovan | Aug 28, 2006 6:24:20 PM
We invaded a country that didn't threaten or attack us, overthrew their leader, destroyed their national infrastructure and now the rival factions are vying for power...simple as that.
The Iraq's are fighting against other Iraq's to control the destiny of that country. The vast majority of battles are not against al Qaeda, but against Iraq' Shia/Sunni's. Our brave military personnel are caught in the middle of this vacuum of power and we as a country, stand to gain nothing by remaining in this conflict.
We need to immediately redeploy our military in a responsible way to the perimeter and get them out of harms way. Let the Iraqi's sort out their own future.
Posted by: GOFD | Aug 28, 2006 6:24:40 PM
Words as pathetic as the man speaking them.
Posted by: Vance Hickin | Aug 28, 2006 6:24:48 PM
The extent to which Secretary Rumsfeld is prepared to lie, obfuscate, propagandize, and attack truth tellers is infinite. This man is not a true American, in the American spirit of honesty, integrity, and indeed democracy.
Posted by: Brian | Aug 28, 2006 6:31:20 PM
As one of the least popular and least credible people in America, I'm sure that Donald Rumsfeld's rantings will not amount to much.
It's too late for Rumsfeld. He's betrayed our troops, and he's betrayed all Americans. He should have been fired 2 years ago.
Rumsfeld is part of the problem, not part of the solution.
Posted by: baghdadjoe | Aug 28, 2006 6:32:46 PM
Oh, we can stomach ANY tough fight that we're challenged to (Afghanistan), we just can't stomach a pointless fight that we got lied into. (Iraq).
We're weaker for it, we know it, and Rumsfeld is partly to blame.
Throw
da
bum
out.
Posted by: mdhatter | Aug 28, 2006 6:38:46 PM
Don,
Just remind me what are we doing in Iraq?
Posted by: John | Aug 28, 2006 6:43:33 PM
If we are fighting in Iraq as the frontline in the war on terror, when are we going to focus our efforts ond get the number one terrorist, osama bin Laden? The rhetoric from this administration continues to baffle me. Why is no one in the media asking why we are not focused on OBL? Get him, forget Iraq!
Posted by: Oldrunner | Aug 28, 2006 6:49:02 PM
This ought to be good. The more Runseld says "stay the course" the louder the calls for his resignation will be. One wonders how much more of this can Bush handle. From what we hear, Bush has already put out feelers looking for a new Secretary of Defense.
Posted by: turtle | Aug 28, 2006 6:54:34 PM
What's the over/under on when they take Rummy off to the loony bin?
Posted by: grytpype | Aug 28, 2006 6:58:19 PM
Islamic terrorists and fighters constantly lie? Oh, good golly and Henny Penny! Do me a favor, Rummy. While you're up there delivering your speil, make an example of these liars. In fact, make an example of ALL such liars. Get up there and say, "Anyone who lies to those they claim to be protecting is a traitor. Those who lie to you aren't on your side. They are betraying you for their own interests."
Why not? It'd certainly be true...for a change. And the quote may come in handy at your trial.
Posted by: G.I. | Aug 28, 2006 7:01:29 PM
Nice camo jacket, Rummy; you sad, little poseur.
Posted by: devilbush | Aug 28, 2006 7:07:07 PM
The senescent Secretary of Defense should be put out to pasture, not unleashed on the American populace.
Never before have deskbound civilians so dominated the armed forces and never before have so many mistakes been made and so much tragic waste occured in such a short span of time.
The American people don't need a "new perspective"; they need new leadership and they need it now.
What Rumsfeld should be facing is not a canned audience but but a war crimes trial.
Illegal wars of aggression, war crimes, gulags and military occupation has netted us zero terrorist leaders and zero convictions of operatives. What it has created is a dangerously debilitated US military.
Terrorism is on the increase and will continue to do so as long as people like Rumsfeld, Bush and Cheney deal unjustly with weak, resource rich nations.
Carol DW
Posted by: Carol Davidek-Waller | Aug 28, 2006 7:14:36 PM
Um...Americans didn't cross oceans, Europeans did.
Posted by: Phil | Aug 28, 2006 7:27:49 PM
He concludes: “The great story of America is instead one of grit, of determination and victory. And that story is still unfolding. Americans didn't cross oceans and settle a wilderness and build history's greatest democracy, only to run away from murderers and extremists who try to kill everyone they cannot convert and try to tear down what they could never build.”
-------------
The man is deranged. Crazy as a loon. Still peddling his propaganda and lies. "Wilderness"? America? There were 500 nations here when the Europeans arrived. Hardly a "wilderness". More lies. Historically inaccurate ones. Lies. The man is deranged and full of lies.
Posted by: Woody | Aug 28, 2006 7:46:14 PM
Post a comment

