The World Newser is World News' daily blog. Here, you'll find our staff's thoughts on the day's news and the way we build our broadcast. Plus, we'll share reports from our team of correspondents in the field, as well as producers behind-the-scenes.
RECENT POSTS
- Clem's Chronicles: Jobs/Afghanistan/Health Care Reform/Deficit
- Child Safety: Crib Recall and Other Recently Recalled Kids Products
- You Buying Less This Holiday?
- President Lou Dobbs?
- The Democrats Need LBJ
- Another Vampire Blockbuster? Why?
- Documenting the Planet's Demise -- One Striking Photograph at a Time
- President Obama Answers Questions From Anti-Castro Blogger
- Jim Sciutto: A Tiny Town Salutes Its Fallen
- 10 Reasons the Belgians Hate the British
- Is Swine Flu Ebbing?
- Susan Boyle's First Album Makes Amazon CD Sales History
WORLD NEWSER CATEGORIES
MONTHLY ARCHIVES
« Previous | Main | Next »
Charlie's Blog
August 29, 2008 4:02 PM
Two weeks ago my son-in-law and daughter came to visit my wife and me when we were taking a long weekend. He has worked in politics much of his life –- Democratic politics. Within an hour or so of his arrival the discussion inevitably got around to whom we thought might be the Vice-Presidential nominees.
"Friends of mine are thinking there's a real chance it will be Sarah Palin," he said. It took me a minute to remember who he was talking about, and then I remembered the newly elected Governor of Alaska. Her race had been "one of the ones to watch" on election night 2006.
"Palin?" I said with some incredulity.
I was saying the same thing this morning. "Palin?"
The lesson may be: always trust your son-in-law.
I have to admit I am totally surprised by the choice. It is a long-shot pick by John McCain -– a "Hail Sarah" pass as one Obama campaign official put it to George Stephanopoulos. Will the country buy someone as Vice President who has less than two years in a Governorship? Who just a few years ago was mayor of a small Alaskan town of 9,000 souls?
She is a real maverick in Alaska politics –- she accused two fellow Republicans of corruption and when no one would listen she quit a prestigious post on the Oil and Gas Conservation Commission. Eventually the two accused were thrown out of office, enhancing her reputation in Alaskan politics to no end, and eventually leading to her being elected Governor. So she's obviously no nonsense. She's on the right side of all causes that are important to conservatives, and she actually favors more drilling for oil and gas on Alaskan property than does McCain. But will Hillary supporters vote McCain because there's a woman on his ticket? Will other voters accept the idea of a 44-year-old Vice President with so little experience?
You can argue Obama has only four years in a major political job and he hasn't really been in Washington for the last two of those years since he's been out campaigning.
This election just gets more and more interesting.
Everyone on the planet, it seems, has delivered their verdict on the Obama speech. So I won't take much time to add one more opinion. When I first read the speech about half an hour before air, I didn't think it was terrific. Good. Solid. But not great, and not soaring in its rhetoric. The delivery, however, made it so much better than it read, and the significance of coming on the 45th anniversary of the King "I Have a Dream" speech made it all the more significant.
John Kerry was criticized for not "going after" George Bush enough in the 2004 convention. Barack Obama certainly could not be criticized for the same thing. The speech was a direct challenge to John McCain.
The wonderful part of the evening for me was the two hours or so preceding the speech. Many of the 80,000 in attendance got to the stadium hours early. They had to, in order to be assured of getting through security, which seemed to take forever. So there they all were. The campaign provided great music inside the stadium and everyone was dancing in the aisles. Literally. Those of us on the ABC platform were doing the same. Well, just a little. It was kind of a party before the serious business of the evening, and to see that many people in that good a mood was infectious.
As much as we were all there for the speech, I kind of hated to see the music stilled, everyone sit down, and the party atmosphere come to a close.
After the speech we flew back to New York, arriving here at three in the morning. We came back quickly so as to be ready to do "special reports" on the McCain choice of his Vice Presidential nominee and to broadcast the rally in Dayton that would feature the first joint appearance of McCain and Palin.
Now it's off to St. Paul over the weekend.
August 29, 2008 in Charlie Gibson, Vote 2008 | Permalink | Share | User Comments (56)
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
Charlie,
I was surprised too but then I remember not long ago she was on "Vogue" magazine.
Obama is nominated for President but Palin is only for VP.
We can't put their experiences for comparison on this case, I guess.
What do you think?
BTW,,,your son in-law is very good on prediction.
Posted by: catleya | Aug 29, 2008 4:28:51 PM
Palin actually has more of a legislative record and more real hands on experience than Obama. She is very clear about where she stands on issues that are important to her and actually follows through on her beliefs. It's interesting that the media and the Obama campaign are making an issue out of her experience given that Tim Kaine was seriously considered for Obama's VP and his experience is not much more than Palin's. Double standard?
Posted by: mpCT | Aug 29, 2008 4:41:34 PM
I am a former Hillary supporter who feels disenfranchised, and will not be voting in this election. The selection of Palin does not make me re-think this decision, as I am firmly opposed to drilling in ANWAR, support abortion rights, and am a PETA member, to boot. That said, there is no one McCain could have selected who would have shared my views. And, I do admire Palin's strong record on ethics. I think, like Hillary, that Palin is a fighter (something that can't be said about Obama). All in all, I think it was a bold and gutsy move. Would that Obama would have asked Hillary to join him. And,I'm glad to read your blog, Charlie.
Posted by: Cardsgal | Aug 29, 2008 4:45:12 PM
Charlie, I love you, and so happy you are blogging here now. Nice change of pace.
Last night was a historic time for all of us and it was a thrill to see. Now it's time for some real politics. It will be very interesting to see the VP debates. How tough will Joe be on this beauty queen? For us political junkies, this is the equivalent of stoner food to the stoners. What a crazy mixture, but it should be quite thrilling for the taste buds.
Posted by: Debra | Aug 29, 2008 4:47:03 PM
Two questions:
1. Is Sarah Palin the best woman, much less the best person, to replace John McCain as president should that be necesary?
2. Did John McCain put the well being of the nation, or his political ambition, first when he made this spur-of-the-moment decision?
Posted by: John's conscience | Aug 29, 2008 4:48:31 PM
of all the republicans in the world, is she really that qualified to be a VP? People talk about inexperience, but Palin has just been the governor of Alaska and little else. But then again, no matter who wins, he or she will certainly be representing the non-contiguous states
Posted by: elle | Aug 29, 2008 4:54:29 PM
Oh happy day. McCain/Palin 08.
Posted by: Kitty | Aug 29, 2008 4:56:51 PM
McCAIN/PALIN '08
THE TICKET ROCKS.........
Posted by: NICHOLAS | Aug 29, 2008 5:01:40 PM
Does either Obama or Biden have any governing experience? Wonder about their management styles. What kind of teams will they select?
Palin may be the only one of the bunch who has any real experience, though it be slight. She may be the only one who has rooted out any corruption personally.
When I was young and in the army, it was popular for us to sit on the front steps of the barracks and brag about how we would act in certain emergencies. Philosophy is no good here.
You find out only when it's time to act. Studying management skills isn't experience.
We have no clue about the teams these people will put together, how they will have the office of President function.
Doesn't seem to me a job for OJT. I'm very concerned.
Posted by: Larry | Aug 29, 2008 5:06:35 PM
I am amazed how Hillary supporters can either vote for McCain or not vote at all. Why? The issues that Hillary holds near and dear sufffer big time with a McCain victory. Obama said it beautifully in his speech last night. Its not about any one or two politicians its about the future of the country. Are some Hillary supporters ok with leaving that future up to some one else? After all that hard work?
Posted by: IndJ | Aug 29, 2008 5:13:10 PM
mpCT: "Palin actually has more of a legislative record "
Palin has never been a legislator and certainly has nothing like the 4000+ votes on public record for Senator Obama. Our opinions can certainly differ, but you're making up facts out of nowhere with that statement.
Posted by: jhw539 | Aug 29, 2008 5:27:44 PM
Larry: "Does either Obama or Biden have any governing experience? Wonder about their management styles."
The Obama campaign has raised and spent over a quarter of a billion dollars so far, with Obama the CEO setting the direction and having the final say on strategy, hiring, and budgeting. And he has held that management position for as long as Palin has been governor of Alaska.
Suggesting Biden has no "governing experience" is laughable.
Posted by: jhw539 | Aug 29, 2008 5:32:36 PM
As a woman, I feel very strongly about a woman's right to choose. Although it would be terrific if we finally had a woman as president or vice-president, I just can't bring myself to vote for someone who I know will do his/her best to overturn Roe v Wade. I just can't. McCain has promised, if elected, to appoint conservative justices to the Supreme Court who will do just that, as well as strip gays' civil rights. So, I say no way, no how, no McCain/Palin.
Posted by: counting crows | Aug 29, 2008 5:35:21 PM
Recall that Palin is under a state ethics investigation in Alaska. I think it will take some time before we know whether people see her political career as being on moral high ground or not. I'm not saying she hasn't done good and important things. Just that few people know her yet and the campaign narrative has yet to be fully painted.
Posted by: Josh Braun | Aug 29, 2008 5:40:11 PM
As for experience and accomplishments--when it comes to Obama vs Palin--how about basketball as a metaphor here? Barack Obama shoots hoops for fun--Sarah Palin led her high school basketball team to a state championship. Is it possible that says something about the differences between the two of them?
Posted by: Hoops Away | Aug 29, 2008 5:59:10 PM
Hail Sarah pass indeed and is there any doubt that McCain picked her to further his political career? He cannot relate to us "little people" -- when will you all get that!!
I was thrilled by Obama's speech last night. I felt he spelled out his platform clearly. It sounds to me like big business is going to pay their own way for a change!!! Whadda concept!
Thanks for the coverage ABC crew. I will TRY to watch the Rep Convention. I have to hear it for myself so those spinners out there can't confuse me as much.
It scares me to death that ANYBODY thinks giving McCain any chance at all of getting elected is good for the country.
Have a good night - good weekend. Looking forward to the news shows.
Posted by: george | Aug 29, 2008 6:08:49 PM
Hey, George, my man--
Apparently you didn't see the excellent ABC News coverage of all that big business lobbyist money flowing in Denver to grease the palms of all those upstanding Democrats: "Follow the Money." Didn't you happen to see the ABC News producer get hauled off by the police for trying to cover that story. You're a tad naive, my friend, if you think the Democrats have any cleaner hands than the Republicans. Why not join us Independents and do some thinking for yourself for once?
Posted by: Lobby Watch | Aug 29, 2008 6:16:41 PM
As for Obama last night. Wow.
I'm a 23 yr. old young Black man, journalism student, Christian, politically active citizen, all that good stuff.
Last night I was so incredibly proud. I felt pride from the moment the pre-speech video started until the fireworks ended, and then a just little longer.
I hate to risk sounding cliche, but I'm cool with that. I watched Barack walk out on stage and was instantly choked up, and then into crying, really ugly crying too. I am so proud of him, optimistic for him, and for us as a country. It made me think of the new possibilities he represented, on so many different levels.
Needless to say a few blown noses and dried eyes later, I left my living room feeling a renewed sense of 'Yes, We Can...' and maybe so can 'I.'
j.
Posted by: Jarrett | Aug 29, 2008 6:29:05 PM
oh and by the way... the blogging is the bomb, 'as the kids are saying,' as you'd say.
It gives me a chance to see someone, that I admire and study as a little bit more of an actaul person.
It's awesome.
j.
Posted by: Jarrett | Aug 29, 2008 6:33:17 PM
Charlie Gibson, you rock! George S. ain't bad either--but you ARE the rock! I love how you make sure you and your team cover all sides of an issue--the DNC is just the most recent example. I'm looking forward to your coverage of the RNC now too. You run the REAL "No spin" zone--not that FOX guy. And I love your blog. I print out every page of it and save them in a special 'Charlie' folder. Keep up the fantastic work. You're a newsman to make America proud!
Posted by: fan357 | Aug 29, 2008 6:43:30 PM
Post a comment

