The World Newser

World News' Daily Blog

« Previous | Main | Next »

Charlie's Blog

August 28, 2008 1:29 PM

Abc_gibson_080825_blog I'm going to post a bit early today because I have an interview with Michelle Obama in an hour and a half and need to prepare.  My inclination is to talk to her about what she would do as first lady.  She's worked all her adult life.  So how will she channel those energies should her husband be President?  How much does he consult her on decisions?  Did she participate in the selection of Biden?  If so, why didn't he give greater consideration to Hillary?  I may not get anywhere with that last question.  We'll see.

I read last night's response postings.  Just a couple of general comments.  First, the young producer arrested yesterday on the public sidewalk of Denver has been released on $500 bail.  We got a kick out of the fact he swiped his corporate credit card to put up the five hundred.  The charge of trespassing against him still stands.  But the video of the incident shot by our crew clearly shows him standing on a public sidewalk with many other people on the same sidewalk.  We hope the charges will be dropped.

It actually reminds me of the 1984 Democratic convention in San Francisco.  I had finished my work for the convention and was sitting in the ABC tent with my feet up ready to watch Walter Mondale's acceptance speech when an assignment editor came in and told me there would be one more demonstration outside the San Francisco police headquarters and he wanted me to go cover it.  So off I went.

There were maybe a hundred protesters in front of the police station.  I've honestly forgotten their cause or what they were protesting when all of a sudden a police line appeared and started moving toward the protesters.  A police officer told me to get away from the group of protesters and move a block behind the police line.  I told him I wouldn't go unless he made the CBS and NBC crews (the cables weren't around then) do the same.  I wasn't going to be at a competitive disadvantage to them, and I didn't intend to miss the story, and I had a right to stand on that street.  He asked me again.  I gave the same answer. I thought I was being polite but before I knew what was happening, I was flat on the ground with my nose in the dirt and the police were trying to take my two-way radio.  For some reason I decided having that radio was the most important thing in the world.

Well, let me tell you when there are three police officers standing on your back, and another one trying to wrestle your radio away from you, it is not easy to hold on.  They got the radio (it somehow didn't occur to me that my camera crew would let the office know what was happening and therefore I really didn't need the radio), and before I knew it my hands were cuffed behind my back.

I was taken inside the station, plopped on to a wooden bench, and the handcuffs were attached to a metal ring on the wall.  And there I sat for an hour or so.

Finally an officer came in and said, "Are you Gibson from ABC?"  "Yes sir."  "You're free to go now."  It turns out ABC had told Senator Diane Feinstein of the situation and she made a call and I was released.  When I came out Barry Serafin, who was then a reporter for ABC, was there with a tape crew.  Roone Arledge wanted to make a federal case of the situation on the air.  I thought it best if we let the whole thing drop.  More often than not people will side with the police even if the police may have overreacted.  Roone disagreed with me, and you don't want to have your boss disagreeing with you, but he understood.

The CBS crew the next day gave me a video tape cassette they had made of the incident.  No fun seeing yourself flat on the ground being handcuffed.  The NBC crew gave me a button that said, "I fought the law and the law won!"  I got a great laugh out of that and I still have it somewhere.

However, yesterday, I thought the police were clearly out of line.  As I said, I hope and believe the charges against Asa Eslocker will be dropped.

As for those questioning whether we'll cover the activities of lobbyists at the Republican convention as aggressively as we've covered them here.  The answer is simple –- you bet we will.  And we will have as many hours of coverage of the Republican convention as we've had of the Democrats.  One hour each night –- Monday through Thursday.

Also on the subject of balancing commentary and analysis versus sticking with the podium at this convention – I think we've been about right in our proportion of both.  The only mistake I think was in not going to the podium for Governor Schweitzer of Montana when he made his speech on Tuesday night.  We had the script of the speech and it was pretty standard fare.  He went WAY off script with a much more animated and fiery speech than we'd anticipated.  He's a colorful character.  I should have known he'd be better in person than on paper.  I wish we'd taken it.  As the kids say, "My bad."

I'm curious as to reaction of readers of this blog to one of the decisions we made.  At conventions past, when the parties ran their films introducing the principal speakers at the convention, we would either talk to our correspondents while the film was on or we'd produce our own film that was more objective in its approach and took a more "reportorial" tone.  This time we decided to run the films made by the Democrats and we'll run the films made by the Republicans at their convention as well.  Diane Sawyer and I both are sort of fans of this genre of film and as long as we run the films from both parties, we thought it would be instructive for the audience to see them as long as we labeled them "party videos," made the point that they were in no way objective, and said we'd run the Republican films as well as the Democrats.  Right?  Wrong?  I'm curious as to what you think.

Now to the convention -– Bill Clinton's speech was very important, I thought, to the Obama people.  Hillary Clinton's ads for weeks had questioned Barack Obama's qualifications to be Commander in Chief.  Bill Clinton, who held the job for eight years, said emphatically that Obama was so qualified.  Very important for the Obama campaign.  Which is not to say the McCain campaign won't raise the same questions -– but Clinton's imprimatur on Obama was very important in that regard.  If Bill Clinton harbors any angers toward the Obama people, it wasn't evident last night.

Then there was the Biden speech.  Those of us who have covered Washington know Biden.  He's one of the figures on Capitol Hill who loves the exchanges with the press –- isn't paranoid about us –- and thus is well liked by the press corps.  A lot like John McCain actually.  Biden gave a Biden speech –- no other way to say it.  But he doesn't much like the teleprompter and thus wandered away from his prepared text at times.  But it was a good speech.  And the appearance by Barack Obama after it ended reinforced the theme that this party has moved on now from the Bill Clinton days.  It's Obama's party for now.  And it will be most interesting to see how he assumes that mantle tonight.

August 28, 2008 in Charlie Gibson | Permalink | Share | User Comments (92)

User Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

the films should stay in...lol. Especially the level some of these films are being made at...the production value is better (no offense) than another run of conversation that seems often too repetitive.

in fact if I was abc online I would get copies to run collectively on your site..."next to" free content with a pretty high production value.

Posted by: dl | Aug 28, 2008 1:46:49 PM

Charley,
I agree with you & Diane about the party videos--I have faith that if you go with your gut feelings, you will get it right!! I am enjoying your blogs and hope you keep it up. I am interested also in whether Michelle contributed to Hillary's 'non-consideration', but I, too, doubt that you will get an answer.

Posted by: virginia | Aug 28, 2008 1:49:15 PM

more podium. Less commentary. show both conventions and let people decide for themselves. Don't need the media to spin me. Just show me. I can spin myself

Posted by: mark | Aug 28, 2008 1:51:06 PM

My question is why did the three major networks elect to only televise an hour each day at the convention. There was so much missed from yesterday such as the great film made by Steven Speilburg. What a tribute to our men and women in our armed forces. Then there was John Kerry's speech which should have been heard. Last, but not least was President Clinton's address - amazing. I must say, I would much rather listen to you, Diane and George anyday than the CNN crew but CNN is where I received the best coverage. As a person trying to make up their minds on who to vote for, I needed to hear and see more than the networks were offering. Next week, CNN will be the choice again. Too bad, so sad......

Posted by: Stege | Aug 28, 2008 1:56:30 PM

Stege, I totally agree. I live in the boonies and don't have cable, but luckily PBS sees fit to run it all. Who knew that Obama's sister would be so eloquent? Who knew that John Kerry had such a fire in him? The Spielberg film was captivating. These are moments I would have missed had I only watched the networks.

Posted by: obamamama | Aug 28, 2008 2:06:03 PM

Enjoying your blogs, sorry we have to enter this world. Why are things that are TRUE and on our e-mails not being told by the media? Obama has said things in his speechs and written in his books that are opposite of what he is trying to make us believe now. I am not a McCain fan either -- to much Bush. Don't know how I am going to vote this year and I am 65 years young!

Posted by: Pat | Aug 28, 2008 2:06:30 PM

Thanks for the blog. As far as your interview with Michelle Obama, it would be interesting to learn if her daughter was prompted to ask her dad what city he was in during the live chat the other night. You may recall he mistakenly said St. Louis after a long day. If Sasha caught it on her own and wanted to help him correct his error...we have another smart Obama to look forward to hearing more from!
Leave the video's in.

Posted by: Richard | Aug 28, 2008 2:16:40 PM

Organized Crime? Forget the birth certificate complications, the Rev. Wright relationship, the Ayers relationship, the many comments that gave American's a second blink---you know, the bitter Americans clinging to their bibles...and so forth. What is with the ACORN relationship and voter fraud?
Cuyahoga County officials have accused ACORN, the GOTV organization employed by Barack Obama’s campaign, of voter registration fraud — again. This might be a bigger story if examined.

Posted by: Mike | Aug 28, 2008 2:18:51 PM

Ask Michelle about the couple's longtime relationship with Ayers and Dohrn.

Obama is all for free speech -- unless he disagrees with what is being said. Think China.


Posted by: Beck | Aug 28, 2008 2:34:37 PM

I want to know why ABC is not covering (as far as I can see) the Obama campaign's effort to stifle free speech, via exhirting its followers to disrupt Stnaley Kurtz's appearance on Chicago's WGN radio last night. And the Obama campaign was invited to participate! It refused, and the campaign headquarters are probably a quarter of a mile from the radio station.

Kind of hypocritical, wouldn't you agree?


Posted by: beth | Aug 28, 2008 2:45:47 PM

Why don't you ask her about her earlier contriversal statements and stump speeches, and why she had to re-image herself to the American people? I think you guys are giving her a pass. All of a sudden she states different things without a challenge. You guys need to be better and I hope you don't think the American people are stupid...we notice those things. Please be objective

Posted by: Mark | Aug 28, 2008 2:46:13 PM

I've enjoyed watching the conventions on my local PBS station... little commercials, no interruptions, and lots of coverage (from the podium to the party videos).

ABC NEWS is doing a great job... Charlie, keep the party videos playing -- and keep up the good work ;-)

Posted by: viewer | Aug 28, 2008 2:47:17 PM

Ask Michelle about her position with the Chicago hospital -- was she really involved in "patient dumping"? Did her salary triple because her husband obtained an earmark of $1 Million for the hospital?

Posted by: Kerrie | Aug 28, 2008 2:50:10 PM

I, too, am watching PBS coverage. It seems a shame to me that the networks will not spare a few extra hours to cover all of the conventions. We have had over 4,000 of our young men and women die in Iraq as a result of this administration’s decisions. Isn’t the choice of leadership of our country for the next four years more important than reruns and (even worse)reality shows?

Posted by: Lauren | Aug 28, 2008 2:50:49 PM

Mr Gibson,

The police knew what they were doing going after your ABC producer & crew and the real story is who told them to get tough. It had to be someone with "juice" and someone who could act with a degree of impunity. IMO you & ABC should be a little more 'outraged' and not say you hope the 'charges will be dropped." What charges? It's ABC who should be 'charging' the police with misconduct. In short, I don't get it. Unless you just do not want to upset your relations with 'the pols' and that puts you guys somewhere in between what the lobbyists are doing....
Charles, get tough!

Posted by: kyoto27 | Aug 28, 2008 2:51:26 PM

I think the videos are ok, as long as you stated that they're biased. Another question, why do you have so many liberal commentators...Diane is much tougher on Rebublicans in all her interviews (see her wrong challenge to The Minnesota Gov last night, but frequently lets Dems slide on improper statements) Stepp is a former Dem from the Clinton Whitehouse, Robyn is all liberal, always tougher on Rebuplicans?

Posted by: Mark | Aug 28, 2008 2:52:49 PM

How about asking Michelle to elaborate on each of the following statements she has made in campaign appearances:

”America in 2008 is a downright mean country."

“We are a nation of cynics, sloths and complacents.”

“Barack Obama will require you to work….. Barack will never allow you to go back to your lives as usual.”

“Our souls are broken.”

”It's easier to hold on to your own stereotypes and misconceptions, it makes you feel justified in your own ignorance...that's America."

"There is no doubt in my mind that as a member of the black community, I am obligated to this community and will utilize all of my present and future resources to benefit the black community first and foremost.”

The loud-mouthed, malcontent Michelle Obama certainly would make one wonderful and inspiring first lady.

My God.

But never is the millionaire Michelle so eloquent than when she is complaining about her Princeton and Harvard student loans and the cost of ballet lessons for her girls.


Posted by: Jackie | Aug 28, 2008 2:54:38 PM

With everything I am learning about Obama coupled with the fact that none of it is being factually disputed scares me. I think if Obama is elected it will be the biggest mistake we will have made in the political history of the United States. Who in their right mind that is running for president would put a show on like Obama is going to do in Denver. He must really think he is the Messiah.

Posted by: Larry | Aug 28, 2008 3:03:47 PM

I say play the videos. They are usually very well done and good content. I doubt anyone intelligent enough to be watching a political convention wouldn't realize they were propaganda. I like them and they give the major players of both parties a chance to make their case unfiltered. That's the purpose of the convention in the modern era. Let them shine.

As for the arrogant Denver cops... They were completely out of line. I hope the city gets sued and the cigar-toting bully gets a new line of work. It gives the honest Denver cops a bad reputation.

I'd pay to see the video of Charlie getting slammed, haha. My friends from Lynchburg would love it.

Good blog, Charlie.

Posted by: Dan McDermott | Aug 28, 2008 3:16:30 PM

Thanks for your blog today, Charlie. I am glad that you addressed the situation with the ABC News producer, who was arrested, and you are obviously trying to let cooler heads prevail (an uncommon approach these days); however, I think you and the execs at ABC should be more outraged! What if this happened to a regular guy? According to your Web site reports, the officer threatened to strike your producer? A police officer smoking a cigar while arresting someone on a sidewalk, and another pushing your producer into a street, with traffic, then accusing him of obstructing traffic? This is an outrage in my view, and does not compare to the situation that you recounted from your earlier experience as a reporter. I really hope that you change your mind and that ABC aggressively challenges the police officers involved here, and their superiors.

By the way, I watch you every night, as I watched Peter Jennings every night--you and your colleagues represent the best, most objective news organization on television. However, I dislike having to watch so much CNN coverage of the events you have decided not to cover. Moreover, I tire of Anderson Cooper's comments to Wolf Blitzer ever night about how the networks have "paltry one-hour coverage" and a podcast (and he says this mockingly each night). This is an important election, and you guys should be covering much more of these events, Republican and Democratic. The regular nightly programming is a bit weak right now anyway; so why not spend more time covering these major events?

As far as the commentary, I think you do have the right balance, and I appreciate the insights and analysis from you and George, given your experience. I wish you had more commentary from Cokie, George Will, and Sam Donaldson. The breadth and depth of their experience is far superior to that of CNN. I am disappointed that you have not included them much in your limited coverage.

Nevertheless, you do a great job; I just wish you had more coverage!

Posted by: Charles | Aug 28, 2008 3:27:38 PM

Post a comment