The World Newser
World News' Daily Blog

« Previous | Main | Next »

Charlie's Blog

September 04, 2008 3:49 PM

Abc_gibson_080904_blog_2 One of the unanticipated downsides to writing a daily blog is the guilt that sets in when things get too busy to write. Such was the case Tuesday and yesterday. Tuesday we spent hustling from New Orleans to Minneapolis. I ask for no sympathy -- ABC chartered a plane for the "Good Morning America" and "World News" personnel that had to get to the convention. But by the time we got to the St. Paul convention site, I was so far behind in preparations for the program that there was no time to blog.

Then yesterday we had the only interview with John McCain during the convention. The only interview he will do while he is here in the twin cities.

The interview took some thought. And I fretted about it for hours. The major development in his campaign obviously is his surprise choice of Sarah Palin. It took some time in thinking about it, but I finally decided not to even bring up the issues with her family,for they are issues of family and should remain so. Once you know about her daughter's pregnancy, once you know about her husband's political interest in the Alaskan Independence Party, once you know about special nature of their latest child, I think that's enough.

The relevant questions about Governor Palin, the questions that go to her suitability to serve as vice president, all relate to her experience, or lack thereof, and her policy positions as a mayor and governor in Alaska. Once I decided to restrict the Palin questions to those areas, the interview kind of formed itself.

The Republicans are making an issue of the media's investigation into her background, and it is a time-honored tactic to go after the press. Both political parties have done it at times. Many individuals have used that strategy as well. But I don't think the stories about Governor Palin stem from any kind of malice. Nor are they improper. To the contrary. She's a great story. A PTA housewife, hockey mom who gets involved in politics and winds up in just a few years governor of her state, and who is extraordinarily popular in that state.

Who is she? What is she? And does she have the experience and capability to be vice president, much less president? Those are valid questions.

One of our staff made the point, and it's a good one, that we'd be asking the same questions of Barack Obama if he had chosen Tim Kaine, the Governor of Virginia, as his vice-presidential nominee. Kaine is also in his first term, just like Governor Palin, and has very little international experience, just like Palin.

So the questions for McCain, as they would have been for Obama had he picked Kaine, revolve around whether he could look the country straight in the eye and say "this person has the experience and has the capability to be Commander in Chief."

If you saw the interview you can judge McCain's responses for yourself. He gave a spirited defense of his choice, and the interview was most interesting to me -- especially since it was the only one he will give at this convention.

By the way, we're going to use a bit more of the interview tonight. I asked him if he could actually enjoy this moment, internalize it, appreciate it, even revel in it a bit. For what a contrast it presents from five and a half years in a POW camp, and how few people ever get to be nominated for the Presidency of the United States by a major political party. His answer was very genuine I thought. We'll use it to close "World News" tonight.

Now the question on everyone's mind -- the question everyone is asking -- "What did you think of the Palin speech?" You can't go anywhere in this town without hearing that. Thirty seven million people watched her speech. 37 million! That is very close to the number who watched the Obama acceptance speech.

I can't imagine the pressure she must have felt. There were twice the number of people in the hall as lived in the town she mayored for six years (if I am allowed to make up a verb). And there were those millions of people watching on television forming their first impressions. And we all know the importance of first impressions.

The speech obviously played very well in the hall. But how it played to the television audience is the most important.

I thought her delivery was just right for almost all of the speech. It surprised me a bit that they would allow a new figure on the national scene to be so specific and so direct in her criticisms of Barack Obama. I wondered if some people didn't think to themselves, "who are you to be criticizing so directly? We don't know you yet. You have to earn that right."

However, my presumption is that the speech played very well, that the reaction across the country was very positive, and that she allayed many of the concerns about whether she was up to the job. We honor the idea in this country of citizen politicians. We have no ruling elite. We have no privileged class with a monopoly on leadership. So people were looking at her last night thinking to themselves, "Can a new governor whose office is more than 3,000 miles from Washington, go to that city and govern wisely and effectively?" I will be fascinated to see how people answer that question.

We're doing some polling today about how the speech played, and what were reactions to it and to her. We should have the results tomorrow,first on "Good Morning America" and then on "World News."

Overall, I thought it was a very successful night for Governor Palin. Very successful. The difficult hurdles are to come I think. The first interviews she'll face on issues. The first time she's closely questioned on positions she's taken in her state. And then, of course, the debate with Joe Biden, who is much more experienced on the national stage, and who knows a great deal about foreign policy. But the first test was passed admirably.

I was with some strong Obama supporters last night. Both of them expressed considerable concern about Sarah Palin -- that she could be a real force for John McCain.

Now tonight will be John McCain's night.

His speech will be a long one. More than fifty minutes when anticipated applause is factored in. That's what we hear from the campaign.

Tonight's ten o'clock ET hour will start with a Republican film made about McCain, and then his speech. Republicans are worried about the Redskins-Giants football game that they are HOPING will be over by ten. They don't care who wins, they just don't want overtime.

There had been some talk the speech would be delayed until the game is over. But that's not the case. They go at ten with the film and speech no matter whether the game is over or not.

McCain will deliver it from teleprompter –- he'll read the whole thing. That is not his favored means of speechmaking, but that's what he'll do. He has spoken at many Republican conventions in the past so it's not a new experience.

I wonder if he'll get a larger audience than Governor Palin? Who could have anticipated a week ago we'd be asking a question like that?

September 4, 2008 in Charlie Gibson, Vote 2008 | Permalink | Share | User Comments (145)

User Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Has anyone heard McCain say WHOSE taxes he will cut? I don't think he wants us to know that he will cut taxes for the rich and big business, but not for us - the working class.

Posted by: george | Sep 6, 2008 10:12:58 AM

Thank you, Charlie for your perspective on this very critical election. I've been reading and enjoy your blogs since they've started--just wanted to add my two cents--since I watch your newscast every night. You're the best!

Posted by: dee | Sep 6, 2008 1:15:04 PM

Charlie, for years I have loved watching you on TV and now I look forward to following you on your blog as well. As someone who also just started a blog, I understand the questions you raise of whether blogs are worth the time, and I also feel how you feel when I get behind. I think once we get in the blogging groove it will get easier.

I was actually just writing a post about how much I've enjoyed some of your side notes in your convention coverage: first at the DNC on the Hillary night when you joked, "We'll have continuing coverage tomorrow on Good Morning America, which is in about 15 minutes," and second, how fascinated you were with the balloons at the RNC. The shot of you, Diane, and George all with your backs to the camera admiring the balloons was just so classic. It made me happy that the three of you appreciated the balloons just as much as I did. In fact, it was in searching for a photo of it that led to me discover your blog (and soon you'll have a prominent link on my page).

In reading your posts, I love hearing about all the planning that goes into the show. You and your crew face so many obstacles but seem to overcome them all to create a flawless show every time. It really makes me want to work with you!

Finally, I noticed in the photo of you on your second post that you use a PC. Have you ever tried using a Mac? I find them to be way more useful and fun and I'm sure you would too. I think you should have ABC get you a new MacBook Pro.

Posted by: John H. | Sep 7, 2008 3:44:31 AM

"once you know about her husband's political interest in the Alaskan Independence Party... I think that's enough."

Are you kidding me? If Michelle Obama belonged to a political party as recently as 2002 that believed a state should secede from America, we would hear about it nonstop, for days. It would be claimed as proof that she was an "America hater." The media's job is not to give certain family members a pass. No, Mr. Gibson, it's not enough to mention it on a blog.

Posted by: Lily | Sep 7, 2008 1:48:21 PM

Charlie,

It IS very IMPORTANT to know "why" her husband belonged to an organization, for 7 LONG YEARS, that hates America so much they want Alaska to secede from the United States.

When you interview Palin, are you going to ask her why her husband belonged to a hate-America group for 7 years?

Are you going to ask her why she gave the Opening Address to the 2008 AIP Convention?

It isn't every day a govenor of a state gives the opening address for a group that wants to secede from the United States.

Gov. Palin GAVE the 2008 opening address to just that group. Her Opening Address is on You Tube video titled:
"McCain's 'Alaska First' problem"

At the Convention the AIP leader said, "we don't say we're Americans we say we're Alaskans - when we talk about America kids in classrooms put their thumbs DOWN when we talk about Alaska our kids put their thumbs UP"

Charlie, Palin's affiliations and her HUSBANDS affilitiation are absolutely relevent and should be investigated as thoroughly as Obama's affiliations have been.

Posted by: cp | Sep 7, 2008 2:26:45 PM

Charlie,

Now that you trashed Obama at the Democratic debates, landed an interview with John McCain, reportedly respect the ideologue (and that's being very kind) Brit Hume, and being a apologist to the right in your interview with Arianna Huffington, let's see if you have the guts to ask Sarah Palin the tough questions without fearing to 'offend' the fanatical right.

1. Did you or did you not support the Bridge to Nowhere in your campaign for governor?
[Read newspaper headlines calling her on the flip flop. Show short video clips of her expressing support for the bridge. Show her photo with Bridge to Nowhere shirt.]
Follow-up question: If you did support the Bridge to Nowhere, do you believe you were dishonest when you claimed that you said ‘thanks but no thanks on that Bridge to Nowhere’ during your first campaign appearance with John McCain in Dayton, Ohio and in your acceptance speech at the RNC?
2. The McCain campaign is touting you as an ardent opponent of Congressional earmarks and Washington lobbyists. Is it true that you hired a Washington lobbying firm to secure over $27 million in Congressional earmarks for your hometown of Wasilla, Alaska? Is it true that as Governor of Alaska, you have requested over 31 earmarks worth $197.8 million in next year’s federal budget?
3. The Alaskan Independence Party favors Alaska’s secession from the United States. [Read quote from AIP website: "I'm an Alaskan, not an American. I've got no use for America or her damned institutions."] There are reports that you had ties to this party in the past and that you are sympathetic to it. [Play video of AIP vice-chair claiming she was a member. Play video of her addressing the 2008 convention.] You have denied being a member of this party and the party is now confirming it does not have any records showing that you were. At the same time, your husband Todd was a registered member of this party and there are suggestions that you sympathize with the party and have even attended its conventions. For how many years was your husband Todd a member of the Alaskan Independence Party? What kind of ties have you had to the Alaskan Independence Party? Have you ever attended an AIP convention?
4. You have been accused of using your influence as governor to fire a state trooper, your ex-brother-in-law. When the public safety commissioner Walt Monegan allegedly refused to cave in to your repeated demands, you fired him. You have publicly denied exerting any pressure on Monegan. There is now evidence of at least two dozen contacts between your office and Monegan. Your sister went through a nasty divorce. I have no doubt you had your reasons to be angry at your ex-brother-in-law and many people may be able to relate to your experience. But let’s be clear: the issue is not whether the trooper should have been fired. The issue is whether you abused your power to fire the public safety commissioner. The question is simple: Did you fire Public Safety Commissioner Walt Monegan because he refused to fire your former brother-in-law?
5. Your teenage daughter Bristol is pregnant out of wedlock. Do you still favor abstinence-only education in public schools?
Follow-up questions: Do you believe it is acceptable for unwed, teenage girls to have children out of wedlock? Do you blame yourself for your daughter’s situation?
6. Let’s say John McCain is elected President but becomes incapacitated during his first term and you assume the office of the president. Given the opportunity, would you appoint conservative judges to the Supreme Court who would overturn Roe v. Wade, that is take away a woman’s right to choose to have an abortion ?
7. Your education is rather unique. You attended at least five different colleges in six years. You attended North Idaho College, a two-year community college, before transferring to the University of Idaho where you received your B.S. in Journalism. You did not go on to earn an advanced degree such as an M.A. or a doctorate. Why did you transfer so many times from one college to another? Are you proud of your academic record?
8. The War in Iraq is one of the most pressing issues of our time.What is your position on the war? Do you believe the troops should come home? John McCain is quoted as saying that our troops should stay in Iraq to help the Iraqi government, if necessary for another 100 years. Do you agree with John McCain’s assessment of the War in Iraq?
9. The McCain campaign has praised your role as Commander-in-Chief of the Alaska National Guard. What kind of command decisions have you made as Commander-in-Chief of the Alaska National Guard?
10. The National Enquirer is reporting you have had an affair with a business associate of your husband. Is there any truth to allegations that you have had an extramarital affair?

The write of these questions stated:

I’m afraid there’s a good chance Palin will not have to answer many of these questions. If there are any interviews, the McCain campaign will probably want to decide in advance which questions can be asked. Also, it’s very likely that they will pick a weak or sympathetic interviewer. For all we know, it could be Sean Hannity.

I hope these comments do not apply to you. If you are not prepared to ask the tough questions, with appropriate follow-up, I suggest that you disqualify yourself for the interview!! We don't need a water boy or water girl for the McCain campaign; our freedom matters. Please don't be an immoral, gutless wonder!!!! Do the honorable thing and decline the interview, if you are not willing to take the honorable path.

Posted by: Dr. Monk | Sep 7, 2008 2:39:33 PM

dear charlie,


as a working woman who has not decided how to cast my vote, I would like answers to some of these questions. seems to me the internet is offering a wealth of info that suggests Palin is not a reformer but a fraud.

Posted by: stephanie | Sep 7, 2008 3:12:33 PM

News just broke that you will be interviewing Palin on Thursday. Are you going to be able to ask totough questions and report the whole story. Please check this out:

http://mediamatters.org/items/200809040021?f=h_latest

Posted by: Gail Taylor | Sep 7, 2008 4:31:53 PM

Now that you've scored the coveted interview with Palin, please keep your duties as a member of the press in mind. We don't need soft-focus walks showcasing the beauty of Alaska, we don't need any background on her family unless you are also going to ask about her and her husband's involvement in the AIP, we don't need background on Bristol's pregnancy unless you are going to ask about how this relates to her opposition to choice and advocacy of abstinence only education.
What we do need is specific answers to legitimate questions concerning her background as mayor and governor and how her speeches have been at odds with the facts back home - earmarks, Wasilla debt, repeated lies about the bridge to nowhere, etc.
And please anticipate the initial dodge that she (and many politicians) provide to the first question asked on a subject and be prepared with a follow-up. In a nutshell, please be prepared to do your job and get answer to questions that voters need - let People magazine have the puff pieces, you get the answer to issues.

Posted by: Louis | Sep 7, 2008 4:46:01 PM

Charlie,

We don't have much time to get to know Palin. Please get to the key points in your interview with her. I for one do not want to make a big mistake due to the clock running out !

Posted by: Mike | Sep 7, 2008 4:51:22 PM

I would hope that your questions of Sarah Palin will be just as in-depth as the questions that you and your colleague George Stephanopolis asked of Barack Obama at the debate ABC hosted.

Posted by: mistress_scorpio | Sep 7, 2008 5:06:46 PM

Charlie,
Really? Palin's husband's affiliation with an organization that sought to SECEDE from the United States is irrelevant but flag pins (brought up in the debate you moderated with Barack Obama) are not? Please explain that logic.
I'm sad. I really used to respect you.
Danielle
New York

Posted by: DanielleF | Sep 7, 2008 5:14:56 PM

“It took some time in thinking about it, but I finally decided not to even bring up the issues with her family, for they are issues of family and should remain so."

Baloney

Once Palin paraded those children in front of the klieg lights, subjected them to google frenzy and shopped them to the tabloids, it ceased to become a "family issue."

“Once you know about...her husband’s political interest in the Alaskan Independence Party...I think that’s enough."

More baloney.

Does media hypocrisy know no limits? Digging into the "first dude's" fantasies of seceding from the United States of America is something that every single American deserves to know. Charlie, if your country comes first you owe it to all of us to ask such pertinent questions. In fact, all Americans, left and right, should be up in arms right now, demanding that you do it.

There is pandering. And there is shameful pandering.

Posted by: haapi | Sep 7, 2008 5:20:31 PM

Wait. What kind of quid pro quo did you agree to? Did you let her write the questions, too? How is it not valid to ask Sarah Palin about her husband's political affiliations when she addressed that party's convention? It's not relevant to ask her about her family but it is relevant for the news to report on Cindy McCain's numerous houses?

How can you not ask about a woman's family when she herself used her family as a prop during her VP acceptance, and shamelessly used her son's military service and her baby's medical condition in the text of her speech? Please don't be bullied by the people you are meant to report on. It's shameful.
David L
Cleveland

Posted by: David L | Sep 7, 2008 5:21:44 PM

By the way--it sounds like the "maverick" and the "barracuda" are chicken. I'd say that the emperor has no clothes but in this case it's both the emperor and (his) court who are chicken...

Posted by: haapi | Sep 7, 2008 5:48:13 PM

Charlie,

With your upcoming interview of Palin, this is your big chance to hold a tough, no-holding-back interview. Don't blow it! The American people have many crucial questions they would like to ask Palin, who could become PRESIDENT.

Posted by: Michael J | Sep 7, 2008 6:14:05 PM

Top 10 Questions For Sarah Palin

1. What was your actual role in the Bridge to Nowhere?

2. Why did you say at you r acceptance speech that the Alaska's jet was put on Ebay, inferring that it was sold there, when it was not?

3. You say that you are opposed to earmarks, but yet under your leadership, Alaska has accepted hundreds of millions in earmark funds. Can you explain this dichotomy?

4. What foreign policy decisions, if any, have you made?

5. Why is it that you have never traveled outside of the country until last year?

6. What role will God play in your political decision making? Do you, as reported, pray to God against the Democrats?

7. Why is the McCain campaign interfering with the current "TrooperGate" investigation? Do you think that you broke the law by your actions in the original incident? Is the campaign worried that this problem will blow up in its face?

8. Like your church advocates, do you believe that Gays can pray and become straight?

9. John McCain says that the economy is not a strong suit for him. What economic experience do you bring to the table? What kind of economic shape did you leave the city of Wasilla in when you left as mayor?

10 Why should the American public trust that McCain and Palin will be genuine forces for change, when John McCain has approved 90 percent of Geore Bush's policies? And, how would you accomplish change, given the Congress will likely be Democratic controlled.

Posted by: Joseph Michaels | Sep 7, 2008 6:24:43 PM

"who are you to be criticizing so directly? We don't know you yet. You have to earn that right."

hmmm, i don't remember anyone asking this from Obama. someone with no executive experience and hardly a Senator stated preaching us how the world should be.

I have yet to see a journalist, gutsy enough, to ask Obama about his own book and things that he admits in that book? Not one journalist has asked him, how did he become a Christian. Clearly he was raised in a Muslim family until 10 years old. Or has anyone asked Mr. Obama about this article in New York Times, from last year (3/16/07)?

Media has to be fair to both side, they are not the "king makers" of America and they sure are coming close to be.

Posted by: Frieda | Sep 7, 2008 6:26:39 PM

I hope you won't wait 52 minutes before getting into policy issues with Gov. Palin, Mr. Gibson, and you did at the April Democratic debate.

Posted by: Richard | Sep 7, 2008 6:34:02 PM

Hi Charlie!

Be sure to see Frank Rich's piece in the Sept. 7 NY Times. He raises several points and questions that seem critical for people to know about Sarah Palin.

Below I pasted one paragraph from the article. Mainly, I am concerned about John McCain's judgment in picking her. It really feels like he has put political maneuvering way ahead of the public interest. Do Americans really feel that ANYONE who managed people is qualified to be president? Does years of thinking about national and international issues, and acting on behalf of the public really mean NOTHING? (Her personal life is only relevant in that the policies she supports--no sex or birth control/HIV protection education except abstinence, leads to the epidemic of unwanted pregnancies and has been shown not to be effective. And the environment is shuddering from her views that global warming is not related to human activity. Even if the polar ice caps weren't melting does really want to promote pollution with those views?) It all makes me sad.

Here is an excerpt from the Rich article:

. . . She didn’t say “no thanks” to the “Bridge to Nowhere” until after Congress had already abandoned it but given Alaska a blank check for $223 million in taxpayers’ money anyway. Far from rejecting federal pork, she hired lobbyists to secure her town a disproportionate share of earmarks ($1,000 per resident in 2002, 20 times the per capita average in other states). Though McCain claimed “she has had national security as one of her primary responsibilities,” she has never issued a single command as head of the Alaska National Guard. As for her “executive experience” as mayor, she told her hometown paper in Wasilla, Alaska, in 1996, the year of her election: “It’s not rocket science. It’s $6 million and 53 employees.” Her much-advertised crusade against officials abusing their office is now compromised by a bipartisan ethics investigation into charges that she did the same. How long before we learn she never shot a moose?

Good luck!

Posted by: Jeffrey | Sep 7, 2008 7:04:36 PM

Post a comment