The World Newser
World News' Daily Blog

« Previous | Main | Next »

Brazil's Rainforests: Going Up in Smoke

October 01, 2008 12:16 PM

By SONIA GALLEGO, ABC News

The latest satellite pictures from Brazil’s National Space Research Institute show how deforestation has spiked by over 200 percent in the past year. At various times during the year, statistics have shown that deforestation at first crept up then soared compared to last year.

Rt_brazil_amazon_080929_main

Much of the blame is being laid at the door of progress. It would be fair to argue that, as environmental issues will always take a back seat compared to agriculture and economic development. Faced with the figures, on Monday, the Brazilian environmental ministry has pointed the finger at the Brazilian government itself as being the worst offender for environmental offenses.  Environmentalists have accused the state Institute for Colonization and Agrarian reform (INCRA) of being one of the worst offenders by illegally giving up rainforest terrain to loggers and creating fake deeds to get around the environmental regulations.

These accusations are hardly surprising.  Corruption is notoriously rife in the Amazonian states where the arm of the law appears to stop short of taking control. Even with this year's highly touted Operation Arc of Fire, an operation spearheaded by the Federal Police and the state environmental agency, IBAMA, to clamp down on illegal logging and deforestation, it's clear to see that this latest attempt to resolve environmental issues has been nothing short of a complete failure.

Other matters, such as a global food crisis and the demand for cheaply produced food are also playing a part. Brazil is commonly known as the feeding bowl of the world.  It is one of the world's leading producers of meat, orange juice, coffee, sugar cane -- which is also used to make the biofuel, ethanol -- and soybeans. As food prices soar around the world and demand continues to grow, especially from rapidly growing economies such as China and India, farmers know where the money is going to be made.

The loggers rule the roost in these parts.  Earlier this year, I paid a visit to the Amazonian state of Para, a place where illegal deforestation is endemic. As with all illegal activities, crime was prevalent and whilst travelling around the woodmills I had to be accompanied by local police officers as the loggers in the area were making threats to anyone sniffing around their territory. Even the IBAMA agents were constantly looking over their shoulders as they tried to carry out their work, accumulating illegally-felled tree trunks and fining the woodmill owners.

The whole area had a depressingly dangerous feel to it, and unsurprisingly whilst driving on a dirt track to another sawmill that was being investigated, we got warned off. A local worker, with a machete around his waist came up to our car, waving his hands and telling us to stop. "Turn around" he said to us.  "They're waiting for you just up that road and they''ve got guns." The IBAMA agent didn't look too happy at the prospect. Not wishing to tempt fate, we turned around and returned back to the main road.

Along the way I asked the driver to stop and let me out at one of the illegally-built charcoal ovens to shoot some pictures. We came across a man who told me that he had been forced into working excruciating hours, filling up the hulking great oven domes with wood to make charcoal, day in day out, and was warned that he would be killed if he tried to escape.

Unscrupulous dealings had pretty much infiltrated the way things worked in this area. The IBAMA agents, in lowered hush-hush tones, would tell me stories of the corruption that they had uncovered, the fake land deeds that they had seen which spurred the illegal deforestation. The mayor of the town that we were in was himself a logger and had absolutely no intention of cutting back on logging activities. The political will to really change and reform this was noticeably absent.

So, the question remains: will the Brazilian government be able to take on this environmental crisis? Not, it appears, without extra help. President Luiz Inacio Lula da SIlva has repeatedly said to the international community that Brazil needs incentives to protect one of the world's most important natural resources. Already it is one of the largest producers of CO2 in the world -- despite having signed the Kyoto treaty, Brazil is the forth largest emitter of carbon dioxide, a result of cutting down the CO2 absorbing trees and then burning them, thus releasing more carbon into the atmosphere. Whilst the current Environment Minister, Carlos Minc, is doing his best to make the Brazilian government accountable for its own environmental crimes, the situation remains still very much as pessimistic as the figures demonstrate.

 

October 1, 2008 in World View | Permalink | Share | User Comments (9)

User Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

This is really heart braking. There are just so many people involved in profiting off of destroying a natural environment that there really is no release from the chains of the system.

Even those who are involved I believe don't understand the gravity of the situation. When they cut down trees the air and the trees are not the only things they are destroying. Thousands of varieties of plant life and crawling species will be eradicated from the earth forever. We are also of course destroying a major component of the earth that makes it possible for us to live.

The system that the earth built naturally for a thousand years can't just be re-grown tomorrow even if humans decided to do it.

Interesting too that an article like this doesn't generate much comment, but if you publish an article about "lipstick on a pig" or some other such tripe, everyone in the world has to get in their two cents.

Posted by: Max | Oct 1, 2008 1:40:18 PM

A real story gets reported and no one has anything to say about it. Then you hear people complain about how no one does any real reporting anymore.

I suspect the easy and quick availability of basic survival needs brought about by capitalism will harm humanity by de-evolution.

If that was over your head... please go back to Starbucks and suck your latte.

Posted by: Martin | Oct 1, 2008 1:44:27 PM

Thank you for the story, Sonia and ABC.

Posted by: Max | Oct 1, 2008 1:46:13 PM

well, it kind of stinks really. i always wanted to visit Brazil, but if its going to look like Kansas i guess i will stay home.

Posted by: jeff m | Oct 2, 2008 7:22:37 AM

Sad, very sad! Before you know it, we'll be out of trees and out of oxygen. But at least we'll have gorgeous furniture and houses to remind us of it! Oh, and don't forget the shopping malls and casinos where beautiful rain forests used to stand! What a bright future for our children!

Posted by: Anna K | Oct 2, 2008 7:54:21 AM

So? Why bother being concerned? All the "concern" in the universe won't stop these idiots from cutting down the forest; they just speed up.

I say we just nuke the whole thing like the Red Forest outside Chernobyl. The forest recovered, it's still a hot spot, deadly to humans, but the wild and plantlife thrive. That's the only solution I can think of because humans are way too dumb to just stop.

Posted by: Covin | Oct 2, 2008 9:39:45 AM

新土地改革,苦了广大农民!
谁能站出来为老百姓说句公道话?
土地改革固然是为了更好的发展经济、造福于最广大的人民群众提高我国农业的国际竞争力。可在推行改革政策的同时也苦了最困难的农民,甚至导致农民去要饭!说这话也许有人很多人不赞同,可事实就是这样的。也许你看了以下鄙人的陈述就会明白我国是不可能急于求成的进行土地改革的,没有两三代人的努力奋斗,过早的改革也许会适得其反。
地处中国腹地的河南省,众所周知是一个农业大省,小麦、豆类、谷类年产量稳居全国榜首。同时河南也是全国人口第一大省,总人口超过一个亿,可河南省的面积仅仅是新疆的十几分之一。可耕地面积更是少了,之所以粮食产量高主要是因为河南的土地肥沃很适合种植冬小麦玉米大豆等关系国民生活的基本生存物质。可该省的耕地面积在急剧的萎缩,不合理利用可耕地的情况比比皆是导致大量可耕地资源被荒废多年却得不到合理的利用。
我在这里举个例子:首先声明一下,这只代表本人观点。
地处许昌的鄢陵县,正经历着新中国成立以来令该县农民最为反感的所谓“新土地试点改革”。
鄢陵县是个花卉大县,说是花卉大县不如说是个借花卉滋生众多腐败的大县,说鄢陵县大其实也不大,主要是人口多,想必比有人听说过中原花木交易博览会,鄢陵县就是该会的老巢。追溯鄢陵花卉的根源,是原来几家农民种的花卉靠朋友关系外销,赚了好多钱,慢慢的承包了好多闲置土地,成了规模,这也是上世纪九十年代的事情了,可当时县政府为了所谓政绩,借花卉大作特作。鼓励农民都在该县城西城南鼓励农民大大种花卉和经济林木,还上报申请成立花博园,结果是花卉面积大增,其效益也大跌,农民有的被强制种花卉了可大多是赔本了,没有变富反而更穷了。记得当时一个花博会的文艺演唱会就让鄢陵县财政赤字,想来真好笑!当时县政府不考虑鄢陵县的现实状况,就盲目的想搞出政绩,就没想过政绩的根源是取信于民,只有人民认可你了,你才有了真正意义上的所谓政绩。
一个花博会的文艺演出要花掉全县人民的两千多万人民币,当时全县人民据我民调显示至少有百分之八十的农民都骂县政府说拿着老子的钱瞎折腾。一个花博园就一万多亩地,要知道鄢陵县人口就九十多万,该县有的乡镇有平均人耕地就还不到一亩地,拿该县的马坊乡为例,有的村子人均七八分地,有的也就一亩半地。在城南城西的乡镇稍微多点可也不过人均两亩多地。可就是鼠目寸光的县政府,奢侈的建立了一个享誉中原的花博园。其构想之好,让人不堪回首。十几年过去了,鄢陵花博园,慢慢的有名气了,可其带来的效益却是劳民伤财。鄢陵花博园可谓是当时县政府的杰作,其出名了,可结果也因为贪污被查办了。慢慢的人们也习惯了花博园,县政府换了大概有四届了,每一届县政府都借花博园大做文章,说是为了提高鄢陵县的知名度,倒不如说是窝囊的不行了只能靠花博捞点政绩了。每年的文艺一演出都在政府的组织下进行,政府出钱,钱那里来,想必不说大家也清楚。可靠这能提高全县的生活水平吗!结果是极为负面的让有识之士反感。每年都上报上级说盈利多少,上级一高兴就进行表彰,随之而来的是拨款支持,可实际是巨额的亏损,拨的用于发展花卉的资金都被挪用,就是假账一大堆,官官相护,没有铁血政策是查不出来的。记得本人当年上高中时候就听老师抱怨,县政府总是压老师工资,为什么压,不说大家也明白,县政府穷的只能靠借老师的工资维持运转了。却还翘着尾巴讨好上级说多富有,还奢侈的要每年的花两千多万进行花木交易博览会,可其花销就是用二十年也赚不回来。这么虚伪的县政府,呵呵大家肯定不想要,可毕竟人民还有饭吃、有地种。心里毕竟踏实许多。县政府是拿着全县人民的钱挥霍了,可毕竟没有让咱老百姓没办法活下去。也就不管它县政府怎么腐败了。
旧日的伤疤依然在,可新的情形又出现了,又不知道要多少可怜的农民要遭殃了,在鄢陵县政府的组织下,也许是为了响应国家新土地改革的号召,竟然强制租用两个乡镇的全部耕地,每亩地一年才一千元左右,可实际农民能得到的只有每亩每年六百多一点,两个镇至少三万人,都是农民,今年小麦都不让种了,三万人平均每人两亩地,就是至少又六万亩的耕地要被政府征用了,强制租用农民耕地的理由是要进行试点土地改革,要选两个乡镇作为试点,把所有试点乡镇的可耕地全部种成经济林木。而这些地只被一两个人给全部承包了。不知道国家是否有这样的政策,可这让好几万农民没有了粮食没让好几万农民心里很不踏实的活着,李某(化名)一家就是试点镇的一家,他家又五口人,两个儿子,一个女儿,都在上大学。都已经五十多岁的李某靠着勤劳辛苦智慧承包了二十多亩地,艰难的维持着家里的生活和孩子们的上大学,县政府的这一政策可让李某愁坏了,今年冬小麦都不让种了,靠那一点耕地可怜巴巴的租金,物价这么高不要饭才怪呢。王某(化名)也五十多岁了,家里有四口人,儿子在外面打工一个月才一千二百多块钱,女儿在上大学,人均一亩地的他们家里,粮食每年都吃不完,还要卖掉一部分粮食产量很高,每亩地一年可以收小麦600多公斤。今年也不让种小麦了以后就没地种了,可怎么活呢?!心里只是恨县政府,恨所谓的人民的公仆……哎!例子太多了,好多人都回想起了当时被强制种花卉的情形,旧的伤疤又卷土重来了。这次农民的觉悟提高了到许昌市政府去告状去了,试想现在这个时代农民怎么可能告的赢一个县政府呢,何况才区区几万的农民,对全国广大农民来说只是个毛毛虫而已,说到这里我不禁为这两个试点乡镇的几万农民感到心酸了,县政府的不符合实际的搞“新土地试点改革”已经彻底的与全县人民为敌了,市政府和县政府是一丘之貉,当然就判几万农民的意愿为不合法了,都说中国现在是法制社会,可人治社会的根深蒂固怎么可能在短短的几十年内就能扭转过来呢。在这么一个小而人口超多的小县城搞大面积的耕地改革,而且时机是那么不成熟,那么不合理,不说别的已经失掉民心了。可最终留给农民的是什么呢,也许更多的是对党的不信任度增加了。经济林木,一般要三年以上才有效益,可这三年之内让好几万的老百姓处于水深火热之中,农民却一点分不到经济林木的美羹,只是少数有钱人的收益。县政府真够黑的,给农民土地的租金承诺的是每亩每年一千多点,可实际到农民手里的只有六百多点,物价如此的高,粮价也在上涨,难道让农民的儿女都去打工,不上学,难道都让农民的儿女上大学靠贷款。这么小而拥挤的小县城弄出这样的大名堂来,始作俑者可以枪毙一百次了。也许这几万的农民对各级所谓人民公仆构不成什么威胁,可几十万呢!几百万几千万呢!都这样的不根据实际情况来搞试点,不充分保障农民生存条件的搞新土地改革,社会不乱那是很难做到的。许昌市不给咱两个乡镇的农民做主,只有到省里去评理了,农民到省城的机会很少的,除非有必须要办的事情要办。除了到省城打工的农民工,很少看到农民去省城观光旅游的。要到省里都没法子理论,只有到北京去了,呵呵,不是鄙人夸大其词,确实是事实,几万农民的生存问题,在日益提倡以人为本的中国是不容忽视的。
古语说狗急跳墙,何况人呢,也许这一届的鄢陵县政府可以扬名立万了,他们可以得到上级上的赏识,可彻底的得罪了全县最广大的农民,农民最讲究一方有难八方支援了,我估计这一届县政府也应该会被查办,因为不被查办,全县的农民都会愤怒,那时候世界也会看中国的笑话,他们也学会温柔的说:中国,你们不是以人为本吗,农民都反抗了,你们还靠什么掩饰自己的虚伪呢!他们也许会给当政者以支持帮助农民解决问题,而不是像许昌市政府那样想的,区区几万农民,理你何干,却只会考虑让自己有得力的县级政府让自己也出尽风头。
反观鄢陵县邻居的周口市的扶沟县,当政者为民着想,全县的教育水平质量远远超过曾经比自己强好多的鄢陵县,扶沟县抢抓工业机遇的同时,突出农业的优势地位,事事为老百姓着想,兢兢业业、求真务实、勤政为民,虽没什么大的作为,可全县经济一日千里,人民生活水平在这几年已经飞速前进,全县人民对县政府的好评比比皆是。鄢陵县的政府每一次换届都会让全县农民一次大出血。我也许也是鄢陵的老百姓天性使然吧。一个小县城是这样子,不知道大政方针是不是这样子,如果真是,那还真麻烦了。因为中国地大人多,不可能不根据实际情况就盲目的照搬别的地区的例子去搞另外一个地区的新土地改革,乱土地改革,不仅可能会把中国的农业改夸了,还会彻底失去全中国农民对政府的信任,连农民都不信任政府了,那政府还要你何用!
(注:鄙人写这片文章的目的只是提醒当政者,从政要以人为本,谨记:得民心者得天下的道理,不要只知道理论,不知道实践,不要上午开学习毛泽东思想,三个代表思想理论,下午就想着怎么不顾实际的想捞成绩,结果劳民伤财,栽大跟头。人民敬仰焦裕禄,因为他是实实在在的人民公仆,)哎,中国解决不了这些小却意义重大的农民问题,我们也只能为农民祈祷,祈求西方的上帝能够保佑这两个乡镇的农民能够度过难关,不过要想度过难关最好的方法是这两个乡镇的农民都出去打工,中国的廉价劳动力又多了,肯定会乐坏了外国企业的。哎,恶性循环!真难想象后果。
在甘肃这样贫瘠的黄土地上,农民艰辛的在寸草不生的土地上开垦田地,一亩地一年也就一百多公斤的小麦产量,其它农作物都没法种,就那一百多公斤的粮食还是靠天收,天不下雨,要饿死人。真应该改让鄢陵县政府决策者饿上半个月,河南并没有沙尘暴天气,鄢陵县更没有,河南更不树木树木种经济林木看似好事情,有利于长远的经济发展,可实在是在太不实际了,不会是把一个曾经地地道道的农业大县转变成花卉大县失败以后,又别有创意的转变成林业大县吧。而这转换过程种效益是几个人赚了好多钱,县政府也大捞了一把钱,该换届了自己腰包鼓鼓走了。健壮的劳动力呢?却背井离乡,落户异地,年老的留下为经济林木除除草,打打药,所谓的村庄直到天年。房子屹立,却空空如也无人居住,也许到时候决策者会干脆把农民的住房都给租用了,用来大建工厂,从外地招来工人。农业大县变成工业大县,也许河南农业大省的地位会保不住的,那么中国的粮食问题届时就会成为粮食危机,危机出现了再解决问题,所需费用之大无法想象,享受过高等教育又充满智慧的高层领导们。为何不把危机扼杀在摇篮里呢!
鄙人只是有一说二,不会遮拦,不请见谅,还请理解!

Posted by: china | Oct 6, 2008 2:40:13 AM

新土地改革,苦了广大农民!
谁能站出来为老百姓说句公道话?
土地改革固然是为了更好的发展经济、造福于最广大的人民群众提高我国农业的国际竞争力。可在推行改革政策的同时也苦了最困难的农民,甚至导致农民去要饭!说这话也许有人很多人不赞同,可事实就是这样的。也许你看了以下鄙人的陈述就会明白我国是不可能急于求成的进行土地改革的,没有两三代人的努力奋斗,过早的改革也许会适得其反。
地处中国腹地的河南省,众所周知是一个农业大省,小麦、豆类、谷类年产量稳居全国榜首。同时河南也是全国人口第一大省,总人口超过一个亿,可河南省的面积仅仅是新疆的十几分之一。可耕地面积更是少了,之所以粮食产量高主要是因为河南的土地肥沃很适合种植冬小麦玉米大豆等关系国民生活的基本生存物质。可该省的耕地面积在急剧的萎缩,不合理利用可耕地的情况比比皆是导致大量可耕地资源被荒废多年却得不到合理的利用。
我在这里举个例子:首先声明一下,这只代表本人观点。
地处许昌的鄢陵县,正经历着新中国成立以来令该县农民最为反感的所谓“新土地试点改革”。
鄢陵县是个花卉大县,说是花卉大县不如说是个借花卉滋生众多腐败的大县,说鄢陵县大其实也不大,主要是人口多,想必比有人听说过中原花木交易博览会,鄢陵县就是该会的老巢。追溯鄢陵花卉的根源,是原来几家农民种的花卉靠朋友关系外销,赚了好多钱,慢慢的承包了好多闲置土地,成了规模,这也是上世纪九十年代的事情了,可当时县政府为了所谓政绩,借花卉大作特作。鼓励农民都在该县城西城南鼓励农民大大种花卉和经济林木,还上报申请成立花博园,结果是花卉面积大增,其效益也大跌,农民有的被强制种花卉了可大多是赔本了,没有变富反而更穷了。记得当时一个花博会的文艺演唱会就让鄢陵县财政赤字,想来真好笑!当时县政府不考虑鄢陵县的现实状况,就盲目的想搞出政绩,就没想过政绩的根源是取信于民,只有人民认可你了,你才有了真正意义上的所谓政绩。
一个花博会的文艺演出要花掉全县人民的两千多万人民币,当时全县人民据我民调显示至少有百分之八十的农民都骂县政府说拿着老子的钱瞎折腾。一个花博园就一万多亩地,要知道鄢陵县人口就九十多万,该县有的乡镇有平均人耕地就还不到一亩地,拿该县的马坊乡为例,有的村子人均七八分地,有的也就一亩半地。在城南城西的乡镇稍微多点可也不过人均两亩多地。可就是鼠目寸光的县政府,奢侈的建立了一个享誉中原的花博园。其构想之好,让人不堪回首。十几年过去了,鄢陵花博园,慢慢的有名气了,可其带来的效益却是劳民伤财。鄢陵花博园可谓是当时县政府的杰作,其出名了,可结果也因为贪污被查办了。慢慢的人们也习惯了花博园,县政府换了大概有四届了,每一届县政府都借花博园大做文章,说是为了提高鄢陵县的知名度,倒不如说是窝囊的不行了只能靠花博捞点政绩了。每年的文艺一演出都在政府的组织下进行,政府出钱,钱那里来,想必不说大家也清楚。可靠这能提高全县的生活水平吗!结果是极为负面的让有识之士反感。每年都上报上级说盈利多少,上级一高兴就进行表彰,随之而来的是拨款支持,可实际是巨额的亏损,拨的用于发展花卉的资金都被挪用,就是假账一大堆,官官相护,没有铁血政策是查不出来的。记得本人当年上高中时候就听老师抱怨,县政府总是压老师工资,为什么压,不说大家也明白,县政府穷的只能靠借老师的工资维持运转了。却还翘着尾巴讨好上级说多富有,还奢侈的要每年的花两千多万进行花木交易博览会,可其花销就是用二十年也赚不回来。这么虚伪的县政府,呵呵大家肯定不想要,可毕竟人民还有饭吃、有地种。心里毕竟踏实许多。县政府是拿着全县人民的钱挥霍了,可毕竟没有让咱老百姓没办法活下去。也就不管它县政府怎么腐败了。
旧日的伤疤依然在,可新的情形又出现了,又不知道要多少可怜的农民要遭殃了,在鄢陵县政府的组织下,也许是为了响应国家新土地改革的号召,竟然强制租用两个乡镇的全部耕地,每亩地一年才一千元左右,可实际农民能得到的只有每亩每年六百多一点,两个镇至少三万人,都是农民,今年小麦都不让种了,三万人平均每人两亩地,就是至少又六万亩的耕地要被政府征用了,强制租用农民耕地的理由是要进行试点土地改革,要选两个乡镇作为试点,把所有试点乡镇的可耕地全部种成经济林木。而这些地只被一两个人给全部承包了。不知道国家是否有这样的政策,可这让好几万农民没有了粮食没让好几万农民心里很不踏实的活着,李某(化名)一家就是试点镇的一家,他家又五口人,两个儿子,一个女儿,都在上大学。都已经五十多岁的李某靠着勤劳辛苦智慧承包了二十多亩地,艰难的维持着家里的生活和孩子们的上大学,县政府的这一政策可让李某愁坏了,今年冬小麦都不让种了,靠那一点耕地可怜巴巴的租金,物价这么高不要饭才怪呢。王某(化名)也五十多岁了,家里有四口人,儿子在外面打工一个月才一千二百多块钱,女儿在上大学,人均一亩地的他们家里,粮食每年都吃不完,还要卖掉一部分粮食产量很高,每亩地一年可以收小麦600多公斤。今年也不让种小麦了以后就没地种了,可怎么活呢?!心里只是恨县政府,恨所谓的人民的公仆……哎!例子太多了,好多人都回想起了当时被强制种花卉的情形,旧的伤疤又卷土重来了。这次农民的觉悟提高了到许昌市政府去告状去了,试想现在这个时代农民怎么可能告的赢一个县政府呢,何况才区区几万的农民,对全国广大农民来说只是个毛毛虫而已,说到这里我不禁为这两个试点乡镇的几万农民感到心酸了,县政府的不符合实际的搞“新土地试点改革”已经彻底的与全县人民为敌了,市政府和县政府是一丘之貉,当然就判几万农民的意愿为不合法了,都说中国现在是法制社会,可人治社会的根深蒂固怎么可能在短短的几十年内就能扭转过来呢。在这么一个小而人口超多的小县城搞大面积的耕地改革,而且时机是那么不成熟,那么不合理,不说别的已经失掉民心了。可最终留给农民的是什么呢,也许更多的是对党的不信任度增加了。经济林木,一般要三年以上才有效益,可这三年之内让好几万的老百姓处于水深火热之中,农民却一点分不到经济林木的美羹,只是少数有钱人的收益。县政府真够黑的,给农民土地的租金承诺的是每亩每年一千多点,可实际到农民手里的只有六百多点,物价如此的高,粮价也在上涨,难道让农民的儿女都去打工,不上学,难道都让农民的儿女上大学靠贷款。这么小而拥挤的小县城弄出这样的大名堂来,始作俑者可以枪毙一百次了。也许这几万的农民对各级所谓人民公仆构不成什么威胁,可几十万呢!几百万几千万呢!都这样的不根据实际情况来搞试点,不充分保障农民生存条件的搞新土地改革,社会不乱那是很难做到的。许昌市不给咱两个乡镇的农民做主,只有到省里去评理了,农民到省城的机会很少的,除非有必须要办的事情要办。除了到省城打工的农民工,很少看到农民去省城观光旅游的。要到省里都没法子理论,只有到北京去了,呵呵,不是鄙人夸大其词,确实是事实,几万农民的生存问题,在日益提倡以人为本的中国是不容忽视的。
古语说狗急跳墙,何况人呢,也许这一届的鄢陵县政府可以扬名立万了,他们可以得到上级上的赏识,可彻底的得罪了全县最广大的农民,农民最讲究一方有难八方支援了,我估计这一届县政府也应该会被查办,因为不被查办,全县的农民都会愤怒,那时候世界也会看中国的笑话,他们也学会温柔的说:中国,你们不是以人为本吗,农民都反抗了,你们还靠什么掩饰自己的虚伪呢!他们也许会给当政者以支持帮助农民解决问题,而不是像许昌市政府那样想的,区区几万农民,理你何干,却只会考虑让自己有得力的县级政府让自己也出尽风头。
反观鄢陵县邻居的周口市的扶沟县,当政者为民着想,全县的教育水平质量远远超过曾经比自己强好多的鄢陵县,扶沟县抢抓工业机遇的同时,突出农业的优势地位,事事为老百姓着想,兢兢业业、求真务实、勤政为民,虽没什么大的作为,可全县经济一日千里,人民生活水平在这几年已经飞速前进,全县人民对县政府的好评比比皆是。鄢陵县的政府每一次换届都会让全县农民一次大出血。我也许也是鄢陵的老百姓天性使然吧。一个小县城是这样子,不知道大政方针是不是这样子,如果真是,那还真麻烦了。因为中国地大人多,不可能不根据实际情况就盲目的照搬别的地区的例子去搞另外一个地区的新土地改革,乱土地改革,不仅可能会把中国的农业改夸了,还会彻底失去全中国农民对政府的信任,连农民都不信任政府了,那政府还要你何用!
(注:鄙人写这片文章的目的只是提醒当政者,从政要以人为本,谨记:得民心者得天下的道理,不要只知道理论,不知道实践,不要上午开学习毛泽东思想,三个代表思想理论,下午就想着怎么不顾实际的想捞成绩,结果劳民伤财,栽大跟头。人民敬仰焦裕禄,因为他是实实在在的人民公仆,)哎,中国解决不了这些小却意义重大的农民问题,我们也只能为农民祈祷,祈求西方的上帝能够保佑这两个乡镇的农民能够度过难关,不过要想度过难关最好的方法是这两个乡镇的农民都出去打工,中国的廉价劳动力又多了,肯定会乐坏了外国企业的。哎,恶性循环!真难想象后果。
在甘肃这样贫瘠的黄土地上,农民艰辛的在寸草不生的土地上开垦田地,一亩地一年也就一百多公斤的小麦产量,其它农作物都没法种,就那一百多公斤的粮食还是靠天收,天不下雨,要饿死人。真应该改让鄢陵县政府决策者饿上半个月,河南并没有沙尘暴天气,鄢陵县更没有,河南更不树木树木种经济林木看似好事情,有利于长远的经济发展,可实在是在太不实际了,不会是把一个曾经地地道道的农业大县转变成花卉大县失败以后,又别有创意的转变成林业大县吧。而这转换过程种效益是几个人赚了好多钱,县政府也大捞了一把钱,该换届了自己腰包鼓鼓走了。健壮的劳动力呢?却背井离乡,落户异地,年老的留下为经济林木除除草,打打药,所谓的村庄直到天年。房子屹立,却空空如也无人居住,也许到时候决策者会干脆把农民的住房都给租用了,用来大建工厂,从外地招来工人。农业大县变成工业大县,也许河南农业大省的地位会保不住的,那么中国的粮食问题届时就会成为粮食危机,危机出现了再解决问题,所需费用之大无法想象,享受过高等教育又充满智慧的高层领导们。为何不把危机扼杀在摇篮里呢!
鄙人只是有一说二,不会遮拦,不请见谅,还请理解!

Posted by: china | Oct 6, 2008 2:40:17 AM

I Work here in Brazil, and am from the US, I was talking to a Brazilian abuout the Rain Forest. They blame the greedy Americans for the problem, saying we are the one's that are buying all the milled wood from the trees.
This is just one more place in the world were we are the bad guy's.

Posted by: US Resident | Oct 6, 2008 6:26:40 PM

Post a comment