Womenomics
ABC News' Claire Shipman and the BBC's Katty Kay on women, work and what it really means to "have it all."
Claire Shipman is Good Morning America's Senior National Correspondent. She covers everything from politics to international affairs to family issues.
Katty Kay covers American politics and society for the BBC. She can be seen in the US on BBC America.
Claire and Katty have a new book called Womenomics. For more information visit the web site www.womenomics.com
RECENT POSTS
- Can women save the economy?
- "Katty, tell us they think Palin's crazy!"
- Palin not kid-friendly
- Palin potshots
- Wall Street Journal Womenomics///and Leave Dads Alone!
- Women Rising in Iran
- Answers to more of the flextime-womenomics emails!
- Alpha-males are out! More proof.
- Feeling the Vibe
- Claire on This Week with George Stephanopoulos
MONTHLY ARCHIVES
« Previous | Main | Next »
Out of Africa
September 17, 2008 1:33 PM
More of my international roundup and some stunning news from Africa. Here's a quick quiz. If you had to guess which of the following countries had more women in elected office which would it be:
Peru, France, USA, Rwanda, Germany or Belarus?
It's Rwanda, of course. A country torn apart by civil war just over a decade ago and where the average annual income is just $1600 tops the world list in number of female representatives.
What's more amazing according to this story from the BBC, Rwanda has just become the first country in the world where women Members of Parliament outnumber men!
By the way, according to the Inter-Parliamentary Union, the United States comes in at a lowly number 69 in the ranking of countries with female elected officials - that's just below Uzbekistan and just above Turkmenistan. Not the best of company.
Katty
September 17, 2008 | Permalink | User Comments (4)
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
Well, if we were number 2, we'd be right behind Rwanda. That's not "the best of company" either. I don't see the point the article is trying to make. Maybe there isn't one.
Posted by: Dave | Sep 17, 2008 2:01:42 PM
Or maybe the point is, "Don't elect women to public office or we'll end up like Rwanda!" That's a joke, folks. haha.
Posted by: Dave | Sep 17, 2008 2:04:35 PM
Ha, ha. Funny joke :(
I would think, from a global and historical perspective, women's voices are and always have severely under-represented. First, from a biological perspective, women have a far greater investment in reproduction due to the length of time of gestation. Men simply deposit half the seed and can walk away where as women cannot. Second, as the primary "keepers of the home", cooking, cleaning, raising children, raising food, often working to earn minuscule wages, women often have a greater understanding of the family needs. According to the Rwanada Parlamentary law, one third of Parlament must be represented by women as it is believed women will not allow the mass killings of the past to happen. Does that make Rwanda "bad company"?
Posted by: Debra | Sep 18, 2008 8:51:14 AM
When will I see the day when any of these GD reporters weather they be foriegn or domestic stand up and say something positive about the United States. Does any body really give a s_ _t about Rwanda except maybe Hussein? I just hope that the women of the US are paying attention to all the female bashing going on since Palin entered the fray. Think about it on election day when you cast your vote.
Posted by: bombem | Oct 2, 2008 9:01:10 AM
Post a comment
